Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 143))

Abstract

Today specifically four-year bachelor engineering education systems are almost stagnant with memorable, traditional, imitative, repetitive and unquestionable information transmissions without interactive debate and criticism. Engineers try to find solutions either as ready procedures, algorithms, formulations or in modern times through internet facilities and software. Even though it has many traditional aspects, static education system and modern engineering topics did not lose much significance along the development path. In engineering education institutions rather than information and scientific knowledge generation, more practical static and unproductive methods, algorithms and software are in use, which may kill the ambitious willingness for information generation. In this manner, the art side of engineering has become weaker and weaker. Computer programs and software rendered engineering education into a stagnant routine sequence of automatic procedures and automation molds without mental, rational and logical inferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biggs JB, Telfer R (1987) The process of learning. Prentice-Hall, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carnap R (1987) The confirmation of laws and theories. In: Janet A (ed) Scientific knowledge. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Kourany

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2001) The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dimitrov V (2000) Discovering fuzziology. University of Western Sydney, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gödel K (1932) Ein Spezialfall des Entscheidungsproblem der theoretischen Logik. Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums 2:27–28. Reprinted and translated in (Gödel, 1986, 130–235)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (2001) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Conrad CF, Haworth JG, Latucca LR (eds) Qualitative research in higher education: ASHE reader series, 2nd edn. Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston, pp 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hilgard ER (1996) History of educational psychology. In: Berliner DC, Calfee RC (eds) Handbook of educational psychology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jansen G, Peshkin A (1992) Subjectivity in qualitative research. In: Le Compte MD, Millroy WL, Priessle J (eds) The handbook of qualitative research in education. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keynes JM (2004) A treatise on probability. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krathwohl DR (1998) Methods of educational and social science research: an integrated approach. Longman, New York, p 742

    Google Scholar 

  11. Popper KR (1957) The poverty of historicism. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramsey FP (1978) Truth and probability in foundations. In: Mellor DH (ed) Essays in philosophy, logic, mathematics and economics. Routledge and Kegal Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ross T (1995) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Wiley, New York, p 628

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rowntree D (1986) Teaching through self-instruction: a practical handbook for course developers. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwandt TA (2001) Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage Publications, London, p 281

    Google Scholar 

  16. Şen Z (2001) Angström equation parameter estimation by unrestricted method. Sol Energy 71:95–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Şen Z (2010a) Fuzzy logic and system models in water sciences. Turkish Water Foundation, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  18. Şen Z (2010b) Fuzzy logic and hydrological modeling. Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 340

    Google Scholar 

  19. Şen Z (2011) Fuzzy philosophy of science and education. Turkish J Fuzzy Syst 2(2):77–98

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skinner BF (1968) The technology of teaching. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Türkşen B (2006) Ontological and epistemological perspective of fuzzy set theory. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, London, p 514

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zadeh LA (1973) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zekâi Şen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Şen, Z. (2014). Education and Engineering. In: Philosophical, Logical and Scientific Perspectives in Engineering. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 143. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01742-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01742-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01741-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01742-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics