Skip to main content

Value-at-Risk Backtesting Procedures Based on Loss Functions: Simulation Analysis of the Power of Tests

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 5312 Accesses

Abstract

The definition of Value at Risk is quite general. There are many approaches that may lead to various VaR values. Backtesting is a necessary statistical procedure to test VaR models and select the best one. There are a lot of techniques for validating VaR models. Usually risk managers are not concerned about their statistical power. The goal of this paper is to compare statistical power of specific backtest procedures but also to examine the problem of limited data sets (observed in practice). A loss function approach is usually used to rank correct VaR models, but it is also possible to evaluate VaR models by using that approach. This paper presents the idea of loss functions and compares the statistical power of backtests based on a various loss functions with the Kupiec and Berkowitz approach. Simulated data representing asset returns are used here. This paper is a continuation of earlier pieces of research done by the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelidis, T., & Degiannakis, S. (2007). Backtesting VaR models: A two-stage procedure. Journal of Risk Model Validation, 1(2), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, C., & Ihle, G. (1999). How good is your VaR? Using backtesting to assess system performance. Financial Engineering News, August, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (2005). A Review of Backtesting and Backtesting Procedures. Federal Reserve Board, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, M. (2001). New methods in backtesting. Working paper. Financial Engineering Research Center Caesar, Friedensplatz, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, J. (1998). Methods for Evaluating Value-at-Risk Estimates. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research Paper no. 9802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piontek, K. (2010). The analysis of power for some chosen VaR backtesting procedures: Simulation approach. In Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization (pp. 481–490). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Piontek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Piontek, K. (2014). Value-at-Risk Backtesting Procedures Based on Loss Functions: Simulation Analysis of the Power of Tests. In: Spiliopoulou, M., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Janning, R. (eds) Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01595-8_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics