Abstract
Telepresence robots (TPRs) are seen as promising tools for maintaining social presence in distance learning conditions, contributing to student persistence and wellbeing by reducing their feeling of isolation and distress. We examined the challenges that the use of telepresence robots in a pair-programming course presents to the teacher and students. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from the teacher and four students about their experience of being mediated via a telepresence robot and having a teacher or student mediated via a telepresence robot. The data were coded and analyzed to map the main challenges. Four general areas of concern were revealed: preconditions for use, justifications for use, robot characteristics, and potential challenges. Using TPRs is justified for students in conditions where their social presence is required (e.g., in discussions, workshops or other educational activities). In this particular case, the use was not recommended for the teacher. TPRs’ educational implementation should be planned meticulously to maximize their positive effect and to reduce potential setbacks. In addition, the TPR's features should match as best as possible to the requirements of the educational activities to be carried out in a specific physical and social environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Demir, Ö., Seferoglu, S.S.: A comparison of solo and pair programming in terms of flow experience, coding quality, and coding achievement. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 58(8), 1448–1466 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120949788
Li, L., Xu, L., He, Y., He, W., Pribesh, S., Watson, S.M., Major, D.A.: Facilitating online learning via zoom breakout room technology: a case of pair programming involving students with learning disabilities. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04812
Hawlitschek, A., Berndt, S., Schulz, S.: Empirical research on pair programming in higher education: a literature review. Comput. Sci. Educ. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2039504
Kuttal, S.K., Ong, B., Kwasny, K., Robe, P.: Trade-offs for substituting a human with an agent in a pair programming context: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, vol. 243, pp. 1–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445659
Satratzemi, M., Stelios, X., Tsompanoudi, D.: Distributed pair programming in higher education: a systematic literature review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221122884
Marinoni, G., Van't Land, H., Jensen, T.: The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report. UNESCO House. Paris, France (2020). https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf
Upton, B.: European universities cancel classes as energy bills soar. The Higher Education (2022). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/european-universities-cancel-classes-energy-bills-soar
Simaremare, M.E.S.: Strategies for an effective distributed pair programming. Jurnal Mantik 5(4), 2531–2535 (2022). http://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/1963. Accessed 3 Jan 2023
Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Kaltenbach, A.: Evaluating tools that support pair programming in a distributed engineering environment. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'10). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, pp. 54–63 (2010)
Leoste, J., Rakic, S., Marcelloni, F., Zuddio, M. F., Marjanovic, U., Oun, T.: E-learning in the times of COVID-19: the main challenges in higher education. In: 19th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), pp. 225–230 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA54173.2021.9726554
Garrison, D.R.: Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. J. Asynchron. Learn. Netw. 11(1), 61–72 (2007)
Gunawardena, C.N.: Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. Int. J. Educ. Telecommun. 1(2/3), 147–166 (1995)
Kreijns, K., Xu, K., Weidlich, J.: Social presence: conceptualization and measurement. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 34, 139–170 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09623-8
Messmer, G., Berkling, K.: Overcoming the gap of social presence in online learning communities at university. In: 2021 World Engineering Education Forum/Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF/GEDC), pp. 563–570 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF/GEDC53299.2021.9657401
Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1978)
Ouellette, T., Ramadan, Y., Muthuraj, M., Pi Noa, D., Yuvaraj, R., Rana, A., Jacobs, R.: The association of stress, collaborative learning, social presence, and social interaction with teaching modality type among medical students. In: ICERI2021 Proceedings, pp. 8121–8126 (2021)
Weibel, M., Nielsen, M.K., Topperzer, M.K., Hammer, N.M., Møller, S.W., Schmiegelow, K., Bækgaard Larsen, H.: Back to school with telepresence robot technology: a qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment. Nurs. Open 7, 988–997 (2020)
Powell, T., Cohen, J., Patterson, P.: Keeping connected with school: implementing telepresence robots to improve the wellbeing of adolescent cancer patients. Front. Psychol. 12, 749957 (2021)
Minsky, M.: Telepresence. OMNI magazine (1980). https://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Telepresence.html
Google Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=telepresence+robot&year_start=2000&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Ctelepresence%20robot%3B%2Cc0. Last Accessed 28 Dec 2022
Mennecke, B.E., Triplett, J.L., Hassall, LM., Conde, Z.J.: Embodied social presence theory. In: 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Honolulu, USA (2010)
Fitter, N.T., Rush, L., Cha, E., Groechel, T.R., Matarić, M.J., Takayama, L.: Closeness is key over long distances: effects of interpersonal closeness on telepresence experience. In: 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 499–507 (2020)
Gallon, L., Abénia, A., Dubergey, F., Negui, M.: Using a telepresence robot in an educational context. In: 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS 2019), 2019, Las Végas, United States (2019)
Schouten, A.P., Portegies, T.C., Withuis, I., Willemsen, L.M., Mazerant-Dubois, K.: Robomorphism: Examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126, 106980 (2022)
Pöial, J.: Challenges of Teaching Programming in StackOverflow Era. In: Auer, M.E., Rüütmann, T. (eds.) Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions. ICL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1328. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68198-2_65
Lei, M., Clemente, I.M., Liu, H., et al.: The acceptance of telepresence robots in higher education. Int J Soc Robot (2022)
Dakof, G.A., Taylor, S.E.: Victims’ perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58(1), 80–89 (1990)
Leoste, J.: Adopting and sustaining technological innovations in teachers’ classroom practices—The case of integrating educational robots into math classes. Ph.D. Thesis, Tallinn University, Estonia (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leoste, J., Pöial, J., Marmor, K., Fenyvesi, K., Häkkinen, P. (2023). Pair-Programming with a Telepresence Robot. In: Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D., Christoforou, E. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 747. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38454-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38454-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38453-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38454-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)