Abstract
Governments focused on nuclear power and uranium after Second World War in the international system. Furthermore, the international system witnessed the danger of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki or the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine. Hiroshima and Nagasaki lived negative affect of the nuclear bombs because of WWII, Ukraine lived Chernobyl atomic power plant accident, after facing these examples, many governments increased their uranium capacity enrichment for nuclear power; in this situation threat for other non-nuclear power countries. Many governments do not want nuclear disarmament in the international system, due to this issue; global peace still can face a nuclear war. Kazakhstan is an example country of nuclear disarmament; in addition, Kazakhstan learned how to integrate uranium in their economic system while following nuclear disarmament path. By this way, Kazakhstan is bringing the uranium bank on the agenda of international relations, and it is an important issue because international community will discuss nuclear non-armament and uranium bank for global peace.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vangeli, A.: Global China and symbolic power: the case of 16 + 1 cooperation. J. Contemp. China 27(113), 674–687 (2018)
Wudan, Y.: The nuclear sins of the Soviet Union live on in Kazakhstan. Nature 568, 22–24 (2019)
Mousavian, S.H., Mousavian, M.M.: Building on the Iran nuclear deal for international peace and security. J. Peace Nuclear Disarmament 1(1), 169–192 (2018)
Tipaldou, S.: Kazakhstan 2.0: Change and Continuity? Political Regimes and Neopatrimonialism in Central Asia, pp. 249–293. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2021)
Richard, R.: Kazakhstan: continuous improvement or stalemate in its relations with China? Strateg. Anal. 37(1), 10–15 (2013)
Bitabarova, A.G.: Unpacking Sino-Central Asian engagement along the New Silk Road: a case study of Kazakhstan. J. Contemp. East Asia Stud. 7(2), 149–173 (2018)
Mouraviev, N.: Renewable energy in Kazakhstan: challenges to policy and governance. Energy Policy 149, 112051 (2021)
Gawecki, M.: New urbanization of the steppe. Astana: a capital called the capital. Studia Historia Economicae 31, 35–56 (2013)
Oxford Analytica.: Kazakhstan will Raise Profile with Uranium Bank, Expert Briefings. Oxford Analytica, Oxford (2015)
Stegnar, P., Wrixon, T.: Semipalatinsk revisited. AEA Bull 40(4), 12–14 (1998)
Friedman, G.: America’s Secret Wars: Inside the Hidden Worldwide Struggle Between the United States and its Enemies, p. 384. Doubleday, New York (2014)
Maitre, E.: Kazakhstan’s nuclear policy: an efficient niche diplomacy? Fondation Pourla Recherche Strategique 10, 1–12 (2018)
Muellner, N., Arnold, N., Gufler, K., Kromp, W., Renneberg, W., Liebert, W.: Nuclear energy—The solution to climate change? Energy Policy 155, 112363 (2021)
Syzdykova, A.: Kazakhstan’s renewable energy potential. Econ. Bus. Res. J. 2(1), 79–88 (2020)
REN21: Renewables Global Status Report. REN21 Secretariat, Paris, p. 335 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Karabulut, A., Mikail, E., Çora, H., Durmuş, S. (2023). The Effect of Uranium’s Economic Integration on Foreign Policy: The Case of Kazakhstan. In: Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M., Artiukh, V. (eds) XV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2022”. INTERAGROMASH 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 574. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_131
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_131
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21431-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21432-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)