Skip to main content

Abstract

Federated training of large deep neural networks can often be restrictive due to the increasing costs of communicating the updates with increasing model sizes. Various model pruning techniques have been designed in centralized settings to reduce inference times. Combining centralized pruning techniques with federated training seems intuitive for reducing communication costs—by pruning the model parameters right before the communication step. Moreover, such a progressive model pruning approach during training can also reduce training times/costs. To this end, we propose FedSparsify, which performs model pruning during federated training. In our experiments in centralized and federated settings on the brain age prediction task (estimating a person’s age from their brain MRI), we demonstrate that models can be pruned up to 95% sparsity without affecting performance even in challenging federated learning environments with highly heterogeneous data distributions. One surprising benefit of model pruning is improved model privacy. We demonstrate that models with high sparsity are less susceptible to membership inference attacks, a type of privacy attack.

D. Stripelis and U. Gupta—Equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/dstripelis/FedSparsify.

  2. 2.

    Communication cost is computed as \(\sum _t^T 2 N_Z^t L \). T represents the total number of federation rounds, \(N_Z^t\) the non-zero model parameters at round t and L the number of participating learners. Factor 2 accounts for the model parameters sent from the controller to the learners and from the learners to the controller within a round.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/neuralmagic/deepsparse.

References

  1. Bibikar, S., Vikalo, H., Wang, Z., Chen, X.: Federated dynamic sparse training: computing less, communicating less, yet learning better (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cole, J.H., Leech, R., Sharp, D.J., Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury. Ann. Neurol. 77(4), 571–581 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dayan, I., et al.: Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with Covid-19. Nat. Med. 27(10), 1735–1743 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezzati, A., et al.: Predictive value of ATN biomarker profiles in estimating disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 17(11), 1855–1867 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farokhi, F., Kaafar, M.A.: Modelling and quantifying membership information leakage in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.10648 (2020)

  6. Frankle, J., Carbin, M.: The lottery ticket hypothesis: finding sparse, trainable neural networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta, U., Lam, P.K., Ver Steeg, G., Thompson, P.M.: Improved brain age estimation with slice-based set networks. In: 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 840–844. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, U., Stripelis, D., Lam, P.K., Thompson, P., Ambite, J.L., Ver Steeg, G.: Membership inference attacks on deep regression models for neuroimaging. In: Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, pp. 228–251. PMLR (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoefler, T., Alistarh, D., Ben-Nun, T., Dryden, N., Peste, A.: Sparsity in deep learning: pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22(241), 1–124 (2021)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Jayaraman, B., Wang, L., Evans, D., Gu, Q.: Revisiting membership inference under realistic assumptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10881 (2020)

  11. Jha, S.K., et al.: An extension of Fano’s inequality for characterizing model susceptibility to membership inference attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.08097 (2020)

  12. Jiang, Y., et al.: Model pruning enables efficient federated learning on edge devices. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jónsson, B.A., et al.: Brain age prediction using deep learning uncovers associated sequence variants. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1–10 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtz, M., et al.: Inducing and exploiting activation sparsity for fast inference on deep neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5533–5543. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lam, P.K., et al.: Accurate brain age prediction using recurrent slice-based networks. In: 16th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis, vol. 11583, p. 1158303. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Talwalkar, A., Smith, V.: Federated learning: challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 37(3), 50–60 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Z., Sun, M., Zhou, T., Huang, G., Darrell, T.: Rethinking the value of network pruning. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1273–1282. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, K.L., et al.: Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat. Neurosci. 19(11), 1523–1536 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasr, M., Shokri, R., Houmansadr, A.: Comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning: passive and active white-box inference attacks against centralized and federated learning. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nasr, M., Shokri, R., Houmansadr, A.: Machine learning with membership privacy using adversarial regularization. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 634–646 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peng, H., Gong, W., Beckmann, C.F., Vedaldi, A., Smith, S.M.: Accurate brain age prediction with lightweight deep neural networks. Med. Image Anal. 68, 101871 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pustozerova, A., Mayer, R.: Information leaks in federated learning. In: Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, vol. 10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rieke, N., et al.: The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digit. Med. 3(1), 1–7 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ro, J.H., et al.: Scaling language model size in cross-device federated learning. In: ACL Workshop on Federated Learning for Natural Language Processing (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sheller, M.J., et al.: Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–12 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stripelis, D., Ambite, J.L., Lam, P., Thompson, P.: Scaling neuroscience research using federated learning. In: 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 1191–1195. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stripelis, D., Gupta, U., Steeg, G.V., Ambite, J.L.: Federated progressive sparsification (purge, merge, tune)+. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12430 (2022)

  29. Stripelis, D., Thompson, P.M., Ambite, J.L.: Semi-synchronous federated learning for energy-efficient training and accelerated convergence in cross-silo settings. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Truex, S., Liu, L., Gursoy, M.E., Yu, L., Wei, W.: Towards demystifying membership inference attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09173 (2018)

  31. Wainberg, M., Merico, D., Delong, A., Frey, B.J.: Deep learning in biomedicine. Nat. Biotechnol. 36(9), 829–838 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Cheng, Y., Kang, Y., Chen, T., Yu, H.: Federated learning. Synthesis Lectures Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 13(3), 1–207 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zari, O., Xu, C., Neglia, G.: Efficient passive membership inference attack in federated learning. In: NeurIPS PriML Workshop (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu, B., Liu, J.Z., Cauley, S.F., Rosen, B.R., Rosen, M.S.: Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning. Nature 555(7697), 487–492 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu, M., Gupta, S.: To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.01878 (2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Stripelis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 188 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stripelis, D., Gupta, U., Dhinagar, N., Steeg, G.V., Thompson, P.M., Ambite, J.L. (2022). Towards Sparsified Federated Neuroimaging Models via Weight Pruning. In: Albarqouni, S., et al. Distributed, Collaborative, and Federated Learning, and Affordable AI and Healthcare for Resource Diverse Global Health. DeCaF FAIR 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13573. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18523-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18523-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18522-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18523-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics