Skip to main content
  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

In the explanation of economic phenomenon such as action the core concept is entrepreneurship. It acquires the character of the function that every person makes when acting. The field of application of pure entrepreneurship is the totality of reality that surrounds a human being. Anything that arouses the attention of the person can be converted into a suggestive possibility and become an attractive project. The information that is managed in the project has its own series of particular characteristics: information is practical, private, tacit and is transmissible. We will venture a criterion of social coordination in accordance with the possibilities of action: coordination will improve if the process of the creation of individual possibilities of action, that is carried out in the social institutions and culturally transmitted, is extended. In other words, an institutional and cultural framework will be more efficient, the more individual possibilities of action are generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The scheme, which I use for analysing, is based on Huerta de Soto (1992, Chap. 2).

  2. 2.

    On this particular subject Professor Huerta de Soto adds: “this same idea was expounded quite a few years ago, by Gregorio Marañón: he told of a private conversation he had with Bergson, a short time before his death, when the French thinker confessed the following: ‘I am sure that the great discoveries of Cajal were no more than objective verifications of the facts that he had foreseen in his brain, as true realities’” (Huerta de Soto, 1992: note 26, p. 59).

  3. 3.

    By open institution, we understand that institution that is a fundamental part of the open society as defined by Popper (1950).

  4. 4.

    For Mises praxeology deals with human action in a value-free manner. He defended a formal theory of human action. But this position is only possible from his utilitarian position. For a critique of Mises´ utilitarian position see Aranzadi (2006, Chap. 5).

References

  • Aranzadi, J. (2006). Liberalism Against Liberalism. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aranzadi, J. (2011). The Possibilities of the Acting Person Within an Institutional Framework: Goods, Norms and Virtues. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranzadi, J. (2018). Human Action, Economics and Ethics. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity, Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and Knowledge. Economica: New Series, 4, 33–54; reprinted in Individualism and Economic Order (1976a), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, H. H. (1993). The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto, J. (1992). Socialismo, Cálculo Económico y Función Empresarial. Unión Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto, J. (1994). Estudios de Economía Política. Unión Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto, J. (2004). La teoría de la eficiencia dinámica. Procesos de Mercado, 1(1), 11–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1992). The Meaning of Market Process. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (2000). The Driving Force of the market. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, P. (1982). Ethik des Kapitalismus. J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marina, J. A. (1993). Teoría de la Inteligencia Creadora. Editorial Anagrama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. v. (1996). In B. B. Greaves (Ed.), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics (4th revised ed.). Foundation for Economic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1950). The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 vols. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Aranzadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aranzadi, J. (2023). Society as a Creativity Process. In: Howden, D., Bagus, P. (eds) The Emergence of a Tradition: Essays in Honor of Jesús Huerta de Soto, Volume II. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17418-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17418-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17417-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17418-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics