Skip to main content

Formalized Deduction of Semantics-Consistent and Quantifier-Dyadic Syllogisms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 505))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 769 Accesses

Abstract

The paper solves how to reform Aristotelian syllogisms (ASs) to make it compatible with classic logic, and further formally deduct them in logic programming languages. It asserts that there exist two challenging problems in Aristotelian categorical propositions (ACPs) among ASs. One is inconsistently to regard the particular quantifier as the existential quantifier meanwhile as the partial, another one is lacking a quantifier binding the second term. To overcome the two problems, new forms of categorical propositions (called expanded categorical propositions, ECPs) are introduced without semantic confusion in interpretations of the particular quantifier, and with the remedied second quantifier. Naturally, made up of ECPs, the forms of quantifier-expanded syllogisms (QESs) are constructed. To deduct QESs, a formal system, also a Turing machine, is designed to decide and symbolically generate valid conclusions. Thus, a semantics-consistent and form-intact system of QESs, with deductive rules based on mathematically computing models has been established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Westerstah, D.: Aristotelian syllogisms and generalized quantifiers. Studia Logica XLVII I(4), 577–585 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooke, H.P., Tredennick, H.: Aristotle: Prior Analytics, Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analysis. Loeb Classical Library, Later printing Edition. Harvard University Press. Cambridge (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Preece, W.E., Goetz, P.W.: “Syllogistic”. The new Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 32, 15th edn. Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kneale, W., Kneale, M.: The Development of Logic, 1st edn. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, Oxford (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Euler, L.: Lettres à une Princesse d′Allemagne, l′ Academie Imperiale des Science. St. Petersberg (1768)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gergonne, J.D.: Essai de dialectique rationelle. Annales des mathématiques qures et appliqués 7, 189–228 (1816–1817)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stenning, K., Van Lambalgen, M.: Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science, 1st edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrison, J.: Handbook of Practical Logic and Automated Reasoning/Syllogism, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Y.: Improvements of categorical propositions on consistency and computability. J. Multiple-Valued Logic Soft Comput. 33(4–5), 397–413 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Y.: Expanded Syllogisms and Automated Reasoning, 1st edn. Science and Technology Documentary Publishing House, Beijing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turing, A.: On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungs problem. In: Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 42,pp. 230–231, 263–265 (1936–1937)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chomsky, N.: Syntactic Structures, 2nd edn. De Gruyter, Berlin (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Some results in the paper are cited from the author’s doctoral thesis and post-doctoral academic report; the author is full of gratitude to the respective tuition of Prof. Dachun Liu and Prof. Shushan Cai.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinsheng Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Attached List 1. Valid QESs in positive Premise Figure 1 and Conclusion Figure 1 (In the left, the middle term y is universal; while in the right, it respectively partial, universal and existential. For comparison, 8 repeated ones, marked by # in the right column, are not removed.)
Attached List 2. Valid QESs with negative Premise Figure 1 (N1 to N15 are of negative middle terms; N16 to N30, of positive middle terms The QESs with * have two Conclusion Figures.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Y. (2022). Formalized Deduction of Semantics-Consistent and Quantifier-Dyadic Syllogisms. In: Kahraman, C., Tolga, A.C., Cevik Onar, S., Cebi, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 505. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09176-6_67

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics