Skip to main content

Site Selection of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Power Plants with Fuzzy Hybrid Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS 2022)

Abstract

Fossil-based traditional energy sources have significant disadvantages based on environmental, economic and social problems. These disadvantages enable societies to turn to renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydro, tidal, biomass, geothermal) against fossil energy sources. Technological developments and increasing economic benefits allow solar energy systems to become widespread and stand out. Making the right site selection decision is of great importance in the installation of grid-connected photovoltaic power plants, which require high initial costs. In the study, comparison and evaluation of alternative sites are made by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods according to the main and sub-criteria defined by the literature review. The order of importance according to the criteria weights ensures the determination of the priority criteria that should be considered in the selection of the site. Sensitivity analyzes provide information on the effects of criteria in site selection evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kahraman, C., Otay, I.: Solar PV power plant location selection using a Z-fuzzy number based AHP. Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process 10(3), 409–430 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Green, M.A.: How did solar cells get so cheap? Joule 3(3), 631–633 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vasconcelos Sampaio, P.G., et al.: Prospecting technologies for photovoltaic solar energy: overview of its technical‐commercial viability. Int. J. Energy Res. 44(2), 651–668 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al Garni, H.Z., Awasthi, A.: Solar PV power plants site selection: a review. In: Advances in Renewable Energies and Power Technologies, pp. 57–75 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sadat, S.A., Fini, M.V., Hashemi-Dezaki, H., Nazififard, M.: Barrier analysis of solar PV energy development in the context of Iran using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 47, 101549 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sindhu, S.V., Nehra, V., Luthra, S.: Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: case study of India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73, 496–511 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, F., Zhao, X.: Policies and economic efficiency of China’s distributed photovoltaic and energy storage industry. Energy 154, 221–230 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., Gold, S.: Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195, 106–117 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doljak, D., Stanojević, G.: Evaluation of natural conditions for site selection of ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants in Serbia. Energy 127, 291–300 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doorga, J.R., Rughooputh, S.D., Boojhawon, R.: Multi-criteria GIS-based modelling technique for identifying potential solar farm sites: a case study in Mauritius. Renew. Energy 133, 1201–1219 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Choudhary, D., Shankar, R.: An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India. Energy 42(1), 510–521 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh, L.A.: Information and control. Fuzzy Sets 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yeh, C.-T.: Existence of interval, triangular, and trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers under a general condition. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 310, 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aguarón, J., Escobar, M.T., Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., Turón, A.: The triads geometric consistency index in AHP-pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematics 8(6), 926 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kahraman, C., Onar, S.C., Oztaysi, B.: Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8(4), 637–666 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang, F., Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L.: Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4

  18. Chen, C.-T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veysel Çoban .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Çoban, V., Onar, S.Ç. (2022). Site Selection of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Power Plants with Fuzzy Hybrid Method. In: Kahraman, C., Tolga, A.C., Cevik Onar, S., Cebi, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09173-5_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics