Abstract
This chapter critically interrogates the notion of the ‘international’ in the discipline of geography. Drawing on interdisciplinary conceptual debates about internationalisation strategies in higher education, the analysis compares the geographical reach of the four International Geographical Congresses (IGCs) in Paris 1984, Sydney 1988, Cologne 2012, and Beijing 2016. This chapter shows that between the last decade of the Cold War and the greater geopolitical multiverse in the first decade of the twenty-first century, geographical knowledge production and exchange not only diversified and decentralised on a global scale but also experienced a profound shift from a distinct Anglo-American internationalism towards a more complex multicultural internationalism. Consequently, I argue that the international nature of geographical knowledge production and exchange is relational because international conference experiences vary by the geopolitical, socio-economic, cultural, linguistic, and academic positionality of the event and its participants. Policy-relevant conclusions highlight the great value of the IGCs for facilitating international experiences for growing numbers of attendees from the events’ host countries; they stress the important politics of choosing host cities in different world regions and offering flexible conference delivery formats and registration options; and they call for a greater emphasis on the development of intercultural skills to achieve more equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in geography.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Analysing the national reach of two academic conference series in urban and regional planning in Brazil from 2004 to 2013 has shown that the geographies of these biannually organised cyclical centres of circulation decentralised on the national level over time, but that this process varied in regard to the conferences’ material, social, and intellectual dimensions (Momm and Jöns 2020). Materially, the conference locations of the mobile event series focused on state capitals in coastal states and that of the immobile conference series on a medium-sized city in the most southern state. Socially, the workplaces of conference paper authors acquired national reach but clustered in the scientifically most resourceful and productive southeastern and southern regions. Intellectually, geographical knowledges and imaginations communicated in conference presentations showed the widest geographical reach within the country but were shaped by similar east-west and south-north disparities as the authors’ workplaces.
- 2.
The 34th IGC in Istanbul, scheduled as an in-person meeting in August 2020, was first postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic by one year and then held virtually from 16 to 18 August 2021. For details, see Turkey Geographical Society (2021).
- 3.
The data sources used for the analysis list conference participants: Comité International d’Organisation (1985, 204–208), International Geographical Union (1988, 61–94), Butsch (2021) on checked-in participants at the IGC Cologne 2012 (see also Butsch 2015, 136–137 on registered participants before the conference on 15 July 2012), and Geographical Society of China (2016, 4–5).
- 4.
This methodology of a comparison of countries with at least ten participants was applied in reports on the IGC Paris 1984 (Dalmasso 1986, 157) and the IGC Beijing 2016 (Geographical Society of China 2016, 4–5). Different numbers of participants at one and the same IGC may be linked to varying pre- and post-conference registration numbers (Kish 1972, 35). At the IGC 2012 in Cologne, 310 of 2,864 registered conference participants (11%) did not visit the congress (Butsch 2015, 136), but this chapter analyses checked-in candidates. The terminology suggests that the published lists of participants at the IGCs in Paris 1984 and Sydney 1988 and the statistics on participants at the IGC 2016 in Beijing also refer to actual conference attendees (see note 3).
- 5.
The COMECON participants of 1984 worked in Bulgaria, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, the USSR, Vietnam, and Yugoslavia, whereas in 1988, out of these ten COMECON countries, delegates did not participate from Cuba, Romania, and Vietnam.
- 6.
The IGC 2012 in Cologne replaced the Biannual Meeting of German Geographers scheduled for 2011 and thus encouraged a large contingent of domestic geographers to attend.
References
Aalbers MB, Rossi U (2007) A coming community: young geographers coping with multi-tier spaces of academic publishing across Europe. Soc Cult Geogr 8:283–302
Agnew JA (2001) Disputing the nature of the international in political geography. The Hettner-Lecture in human geography. Geogr Z 89:1–16
Aufenvenne P et al (2021) Participation and communication behaviour at academic conferences: an empirical gender study at the German Congress of Geography 2019. Geoforum 126:192–204
Bauder H (2015) The international mobility of academics: a labour market perspective. Int Migr 53:83–96
Bradshaw M, Stenning A (2004) East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union: the post-socialist states. Pearson Education, Harlow
Butsch C (2015) IGC 2012: facts and figures. In: Kraas F et al (eds) IGC Cologne 2012: down to earth: documenting the 32nd International Geographical Congress in Cologne 26–30 August 2012 (=Kölner Geographische Arbeiten 95). Geographisches Institut der Universität zu Köln, Köln, pp 136–159
Butsch C (2021) Number of checked-in participants at the IGC Cologne 2012 by country of registration. Email communication by PD Dr Carsten Butsch, Department of Geography, University of Bonn. Received 28 Sept 2021
Buttimer A (1983) The practice of geography. Longman, London
Collignon B (1996) Congrès et conférences regionales. In: Robic M-C, Briend A-M, Rössler M (eds) Géographes face au monde: l’union géographique internationale et les congrès internationaux de géographie. L’Harmattan, Paris, pp 87–116
Comité International d’Organisation (1985) Congress proceedings: 25th International Geographical Congress Paris 1984. Comité International d’Organisation, Caen
Craggs R (2014) Postcolonial geographies, decolonization, and the performance of geopolitics at Commonwealth conferences. Singap J Trop Geogr 35:39–55
Cresswell T (2013) Geographic thought: a critical introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden
Dalmasso E (1986) Le XXVe congrés international de géographie: Paris—Les Alpes (27–31 août 1984). Ann Géo 528:148–167
Dawson J, Jöns H (2018) Unravelling legacy: a triadic actor-network theory approach to understanding the outcomes of mega events. J Sport Tour 22:43–65
Derudder B, Liu X (2016) How international is the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers? A social network analysis perspective. Environ Plan A Econ Socd 48:309–329
Drummond LBW, Young D (2020) Socialist and post-socialist urbanisms: critical reflections from a global perspective. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Esson J (2020) ‘The why and the white’: racism and curriculum reform in British geography. Area 52:708–715
Ferretti F (2019) Anarchy and geography: Reclus and Kropotkin in the UK. Routledge, New York
Garcia-Ramon M-D (2003) Globalization and international geography: the questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Prog Hum Geogr 27:1–5
Geographical Society of China (2016) The 33rd International Geographical Congress, Beijing, China, 21–25 Aug 2016: “Shaping our harmonious worlds” provided by the local organising committee of the IGU 2016. Geographical Society of China. http://igu-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Report-of-The-33rd-International-Geographical-Congress.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2021
Gold JR, Gold MM (2007) Athens to Athens: the summer Olympics, 1896–2004. In: Gold JR, Gold MM (eds) Olympic cities: city agendas, planning, and the world’s games, 1896–2012. Routledge, London, pp 15–47
Growe A (2019) Developing trust in face-to-face interaction of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS). Reg Stud 53:720–730
Gui Q, Liu C, Du D (2019) Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: a network perspective. Geoforum 105:1–12
Gunter A, Raghuram P (2018) International study in the global south: linking institutional, staff, student, and knowledge mobilities. Glob Soc Educ 16:192–207
Harris CD (2001) English as international language in geography: development and limitations. Geogr Rev 91:675–689
Hodder J, Legg S, Heffernan M (2015) Introduction: historical geographies of internationalism, 1900–1950. Polit Geogr 49:1–6
Hopkins D, Higham J, Tapp S, Duncan T (2016) Academic mobility in the Anthropocene era: a comparative study of university policy at three New Zealand institutions. J Sustain Tour 24:376–397
International Geographical Union (1988) Final report. In: 26th International Geographical Congress Sydney 1988. International Geographical Union, Sydney
International Geographical Union (2021) Statutes. https://igu-online.org/organization/statutes/. Accessed 28 Sept 2021
Jöns H (2015) Talent mobility and the shifting geographies of Latourian knowledge hubs. Popul Space Place 21:372–389
Jöns H (2017) Feminizing the university: the mobilities, careers, and contributions of early female academics in the University of Cambridge, 1926–1955. Prof Geogr 69:670–682
Jöns H, Heffernan M, Meusburger P (2017) Mobilities of knowledge: an introduction. In: Jöns H, Meusburger P, Heffernan M (eds) Mobilities of knowledge. Springer, Cham, pp 1–19
Kish G (1972) The participants. In: IGU Commission on History of Geographical Thought (eds) Geography through a century of international congresses. UNESCO, Paris, pp 35–49
Kitchin R (ed) (2007) Mapping worlds: international perspectives on social and cultural geographies. Routledge, New York
Knight J (2004) Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales. J Stud Int Educ 8:5–31
Knight J (2012) Concepts, rationales, and interpretive frameworks in the internationalization of higher education. In: Deardorff DK, de Wit H, Heyl JD, Adams T (eds) The SAGE handbook of international higher education. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 27–42
Knight J (2014) Three generations of crossborder higher education: new developments, issues and challenges. In: Streitwieser B (ed) Internationalisation of higher education and global mobility. Symposium Books, Oxford, pp 43–58
Lamego M (2020) How international was the International Geographical Congress in Rio de Janeiro 1956? On location and language politics. In: Schelhaas B et al (eds) Decolonising and internationalising geography: essays in the history of contested science. Springer, Cham, pp 113–126
Lang T et al (2015) Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization: perspectives from central and eastern Europe and beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Livingstone DN (1992) The geographical tradition: episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. Blackwell, London
Madge C, Raghuram P, Noxolo P (2015) Conceptualizing international education: from international student to international study. Prog Hum Geogr 39:681–701
Maisonobe M et al (2017) The global geography of scientific visibility: a deconcentration process (1999–2011). Scientometrics 113:479–493
Maskell P, Bathelt H, Malmberg A (2006) Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters. Eur Plan Stud 14:997–1013
Mbah M (2017) Formal education as a facilitator of migration and integration: a case study of Nigerian university graduates. In: Jöns H, Meusburger P, Heffernan M (eds) Mobilities of knowledge. Springer, Cham, pp 247–268
McEwan C (2000) Gender, geography and empire: Victorian women travellers in West Africa. Ashgate, Aldershot
Meadows ME (2020) Perspectives on internationalism in geography. Geogr Pol 93:493–503
Minca C (2018) The cosmopolitan geographer’s dilemma: or, will national geographies survive neo-liberalism? Geogr Z 106:4–15
Mitchell K (2018) Making workers: radical geographies of education. Pluto Press, London
Mittelmeier J et al (2021) Conceptualizing internationalization at a distance: a “third category” of university internationalization. J Stud Int Educ 25:266–282
Momm CF, Jöns H (2020) Decentralized concentration through cyclical events: the geographies of academic conferences in urban and regional development and planning in Brazil, 2004–2013. Geoforum 112:104–117
Paasi A (2005) Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environ Plann Econ Soc 37:769–789
Power D, Jansson J (2008) Cyclical clusters in global circuits: overlapping spaces in furniture trade fairs. Econ Geogr 84:423–448
Robertson SL (2017) Making education markets through global trade agreements. Glob Soc Educ 15:296–308
Robic M-C, Briend A-M, Rössler M (eds) (1996) Géographes face au monde: l’union géographique internationale et les congrès internationaux de géographie. L’Harmattan, Paris
Roche M (2019) New Zealand geography and the International Geographical Union part II: audience to stage, 1956–1974. NZ Geogr 75:51–62
Rye SA (2014) The educational space of global online higher education. Geoforum 51:6–14
Schelhaas B et al (eds) (2020) Decolonising and internationalising geography: essays in the history of contested science. Springer, Cham
Storme T et al (2017) Mobility and professional networks in academia: an exploration of the obligations of presence. Mobilities 12:405–424
Taylor PJ (1999) Modernities: a geohistorical interpretation. Polity Press, Cambridge
Tebbett N, Jöns H, Hoyler M (2021) Openness towards diversity? Cultural homophily in student perceptions of teaching and learning provided by international and home academics. Glob Soc Educ 19:522–544
Turkey Geographical Society (2021) 34th International Geographical Congress. https://www.igc2020.org/. Accessed 28 Sept 2021
Waters JL (2012) Geographies of international education: mobilities and the reproduction of social (dis)advantage. Geogr Compass 6:123–136
Waters JL, Leung M (2017) Trans-knowledge? Geography, mobility, and knowledge in transnational education. In: Jöns H, Meusburger P, Heffernan M (eds) Mobilities of knowledge. Springer, Cham, pp 269–285
Weisser F, Müller-Mahn D (2017) No place for the political: micro-geographies of the Paris climate conference 2015. Antipode 49:802–820
Withers CWJ (2010) Geography and science in Britain, 1831–1939: a study of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Acknowledgements
I gratefully acknowledge the support of Bruno Schelhaas who kindly made available materials from the Archive for Geography at the Leibniz-Institute of Regional Geography in Leipzig when it was inaccessible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sincere thanks are also due to Carsten Butsch, for his exemplary generosity of sharing statistics on the IGC 2012 in Cologne, and to Federico Ferretti, Vladimir Kolosov, and Bruno Schelhaas for their constructive comments on earlier versions of this text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jöns, H. (2022). The ‘International’ in Geography: Concepts, Actors, Challenges. In: Kolosov, V., García-Álvarez, J., Heffernan, M., Schelhaas, B. (eds) A Geographical Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05419-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05419-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05418-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05419-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)