Skip to main content

Analytical Solutions of Water Hammer in Metal Pipes. Part II—Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fatigue and Fracture of Materials and Structures

Abstract

The newly derived analytical solutions of water hammer for dynamic flow velocity and wall shear stress, as well as the previously known albeit corrected pressure solutions, have been studied in detail. Their correctness was verified with the help of comparative tests with the results obtained with the use of a numerical solution in which a model of frequency-dependent hydraulic friction was implemented. The dynamic pressure courses were compared with the results of the experimental tests. The performed comparisons showed that the analytical models based on Brown's asymptotic extension of frequency-dependent friction function are very compatible with experimental studies for small values of water hammer number Wh. Due to the fact that the majority of unsteady water flows occur for small values of Wh < 0.1, it can be concluded that the new solutions can be safely used in engineering practice (excluding wall shear stress solution), i.e., when calculating unsteady water hammer wave dependent flows occurring in water supply systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grattan-Guinness I, Engelsman S (1982) The manuscripts of Paul Charpi. Hist Math 9(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fische H, Kaul H (2014) Mathematik für Physiker Band 2. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gray CAM (1953) The analysis of the dissipation of energy in water hammer. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 119:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gray CAM (1954) Analysis of water hammer by characteristics. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 119:1176–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ezekial FD, Paynter HM (1957) Computer representation of engineering systems involving fluid transients. Trans ASME 79:1840–1850

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lister M (1960) The numerical solution of hyperbolic partial differential equations by the method of characteristics. In: Ralston A, Wiley HS (eds) Mathematical methods for digital computers, edited by. John Wiley &Sons, New York, Chap. 15, pp 165–179

    Google Scholar 

  7. Streeter VL, Lai C (1962) Water hammer analysis including fluid friction. J Hydr Div Am Soc Civ Eng, May, pp 79–112

    Google Scholar 

  8. Streeter VL (1962) Water hammer analysis with nonlinear frictional resistance, hydraulics and fluid mechanics. Proceedings of the first Australasian conference held at the university of Western Australia, 6–13 Dec, pp 431–452

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zielke W (1966) Frequency-dependent friction in transient pipe flow. Doctoral Thesis, University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zielke W (1968) Frequency-dependent friction in transient pipe flow. ASME J Basic Eng 90:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trikha AK (1975) An efficient method for simulating frequency-dependent friction in transient liquid flow. J Fluids Eng ASME 97(1):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kagawa T, Lee I, Kitagawa A, Takenaka T (1983) High speed and accurate computing me-thod of frequency-dependent friction in laminar pipe flow for characteristics method (in Japanese). Trans Japan Soc Mech Eng Part A 49(447):2638–2644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schohl GA (1993) Improved approximate method for simulating frequency—dependent friction in transient laminar flow. J Fluids Eng ASME 115:420–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vítkovský J, Stephens M, Bergant A, Lambert M, Simpson A (2004) Efficient and accurate calculation of Zielke and Vardy-Brown unsteady friction in pipe transients. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on pressure surges. Chester, UK, 24–26 March, pp 405–419

    Google Scholar 

  15. Urbanowicz K (2018) Fast and accurate modelling of frictional transient pipe flow. Z Angew Math Mech 98(5):802–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarzycki Z (1994) A hydraulic resistance of unsteady fluid flow in pipes. Published by Technical University of Szczecin, 516, Szczecin (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zarzycki Z (2000) On weighting function for wall shear stress during unsteady turbulent flow. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on pressure surges. BHR Group, Hague, Holland, 39, pp 529–534

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vardy AE, Hwang KL, Brown JMB (1993) A weighting function model of transient turbulent pipe friction. J Hydraul Res 31(4):533–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vardy AE, Brown JMB (2003) Transient turbulent friction in smooth pipe flows. J Sound Vib 259(5):1011–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vardy AE, Brown JMB (2010) Evaluation of unsteady wall shear stress by Zielke’s method. J Hydraul Eng 136:453–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Urbanowicz K, Bergant A, Stosiak M, Lubecki M (2022) Analytical solutions of water hammer in metal pipes. Part II—brief theoretical study. Grzegorz Lesiuk et al. (Eds): Fatigue and Fracture of Materials and Structures, vol. 24, 978-3-030-97821-1, 522626_1_En, (Chapter 7). Springer

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chaudhry MH (2014) Applied hydraulic transients. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Tijsseling AS, Bergant A (2007) Meshless computation of water hammer, Scientific Bulletin of the “Politehnica” University of Timişoara. Transactions on Mechanics 52(66):65–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wylie EB, Streeter VL (1993) Fluid transients in systems. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  25. Urbanowicz K (2017) Analytical expressions for effective weighting functions used during simulations of water hammer. J Theor Appl Mech 55(3):1029–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. García García FJ (2017) Transient discharge of a pressurised incompressible fluid through a pipe and analytical solution for unsteady turbulent pipe flow, Ph.D. thesis. Higher Polytechnic College-University of a Coruña

    Google Scholar 

  27. García García FJ, Alvariño PF (2019) On an analytic solution for general unsteady/transient turbulent pipe flow and starting turbulent flow. Eur J Mech B Fluids 74:200–210

    Google Scholar 

  28. Urbanowicz K, Firkowski M, Bergant A (2018) Comparing analytical solutions for unsteady laminar pipe flow. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference pressure surges. Bordeaux, pp 283–303

    Google Scholar 

  29. Urbanowicz K, Jing H, Bergant A, Stosiak M, Lubecki M (2021) Progress in analytical modeling of water hammer. Proc Fluids Eng Div Summer Meeting FEDSM 2021(August):10–12

    Google Scholar 

  30. Urbanowicz K (2017) Computational compliance criteria in water hammer modelling. E3S Web of Conferences, 19, 03021

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bergant A, Simpson AR, Vítkovský J (2001) Developments in unsteady pipe flow friction modelling. J Hydraul Res 39(3):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Adamkowski A, Lewandowski M (2006) Experimental examination of unsteady friction models for transient pipe flow simulation. J Fluids Eng 128:1351–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Anton Bergant gratefully acknowledges the support of the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) conducted through the project L2-1825 and the program P2-0126.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamil Urbanowicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Urbanowicz, K., Bergant, A., Stosiak, M., Towarnicki, K. (2022). Analytical Solutions of Water Hammer in Metal Pipes. Part II—Comparative Study. In: Lesiuk, G., Duda, S., Correia, J.A.F.O., De Jesus, A.M.P. (eds) Fatigue and Fracture of Materials and Structures. Structural Integrity, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97822-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97822-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97821-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97822-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics