Abstract
A complex system’s identity and viability are directly related and affected by its context. It is important to identify, monitor, and manage (or mitigate risk) of system contextual elements. This chapter defines complex system context with respect to Complex System Governance (CSG) and provides a methodology to define relevant contextual elements for the practitioner to use for risk mitigation and governance. Leveraging the systems of systems engineering (SoSE) methodology as described in Keating and Adams, Overview of the systems of systems engineering methodology [2], and Crownover’s complex system contextual framework (CSCF) [6] this article will help the practitioner identify and evaluate relative importance of contextual elements to maintain the viability and identity of a complex system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Event and data regarding the Coca-Cola case were extracted from www.History.com (Klein 2020).
- 2.
Principles and description are quoted from Whitney, et al.’s System Theory as a Foundation for Governance of Complex System journal article [12].
- 3.
Perspective overview taken from [2].
- 4.
If the world views of stakeholders are so different that a satisficing statement cannot be written, a type four error has occurred. A type four error is engaging in a problem solution with incompatible or divergent “philosophical” perspectives. These efforts do not often end well unless the opposing philosophical perspectives are addressed satisfactorily.
- 5.
Descriptions in this table are quoted from Adams and Meyers “Perspective 1 of the SoSE methodology: framing the system under study”. [3]
References
Adams KM (2011) Systems principals: foundation for the SoSE methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):120–155
Adams KM, Keating CB (2011) Overview of the systems of systems engineering methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):112–119
Adams KM, Meyers TJ (2011) Perspective 1 of the SoSE methodology: framing the system under study. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):163–192
Adams KM, Hester PT (2012) Errors in systems approaches. Int J Syst Syst Eng 3(3/4):233–242
Clemson B (1984) Cybernetics: a new management tool. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Phillidelphia, pp 199–257
Crownover WM (2005) Complex system contextual framework (CSCF) a grounded-theory construction for the articulation of system context in addressing complex systems problems. Old Dominion University Submitted Dissertation. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
Hinton A (2014) Understanding context environment, language, and information architecture. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol
Keating CB (2015) Complex system governance: confronting ‘System Drift.’ Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
Katina PF, Keating CB (2016) Complex system governance development: a first generation methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 43–74
McCullough M (2004) Digital ground: architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
Whitney K, Bradley JM, Baugh DE, Chesterman CW Jr (2015) Systems theory as a foundation for governance of complex systems. Int J Syst Syst Eng 6(1/2):15–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schoenberg, M. (2022). Context in Complex Systems Governance. In: Keating, C.B., Katina, P.F., Chesterman Jr., C.W., Pyne, J.C. (eds) Complex System Governance. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93852-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93852-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93851-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93852-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)