Skip to main content

Context in Complex Systems Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex System Governance

Part of the book series: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ((TSRQ,volume 40))

  • 514 Accesses

Abstract

A complex system’s identity and viability are directly related and affected by its context. It is important to identify, monitor, and manage (or mitigate risk) of system contextual elements. This chapter defines complex system context with respect to Complex System Governance (CSG) and provides a methodology to define relevant contextual elements for the practitioner to use for risk mitigation and governance. Leveraging the systems of systems engineering (SoSE) methodology as described in Keating and Adams, Overview of the systems of systems engineering methodology [2], and Crownover’s complex system contextual framework (CSCF) [6] this article will help the practitioner identify and evaluate relative importance of contextual elements to maintain the viability and identity of a complex system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Event and data regarding the Coca-Cola case were extracted from www.History.com (Klein 2020).

  2. 2.

    Principles and description are quoted from Whitney, et al.’s System Theory as a Foundation for Governance of Complex System journal article [12].

  3. 3.

    Perspective overview taken from [2].

  4. 4.

    If the world views of stakeholders are so different that a satisficing statement cannot be written, a type four error has occurred. A type four error is engaging in a problem solution with incompatible or divergent “philosophical” perspectives. These efforts do not often end well unless the opposing philosophical perspectives are addressed satisfactorily.

  5. 5.

    Descriptions in this table are quoted from Adams and Meyers “Perspective 1 of the SoSE methodology: framing the system under study”. [3]

References

  1. Adams KM (2011) Systems principals: foundation for the SoSE methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):120–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams KM, Keating CB (2011) Overview of the systems of systems engineering methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):112–119

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adams KM, Meyers TJ (2011) Perspective 1 of the SoSE methodology: framing the system under study. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):163–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams KM, Hester PT (2012) Errors in systems approaches. Int J Syst Syst Eng 3(3/4):233–242

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clemson B (1984) Cybernetics: a new management tool. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Phillidelphia, pp 199–257

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crownover WM (2005) Complex system contextual framework (CSCF) a grounded-theory construction for the articulation of system context in addressing complex systems problems. Old Dominion University Submitted Dissertation. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hinton A (2014) Understanding context environment, language, and information architecture. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keating CB (2015) Complex system governance: confronting ‘System Drift.’ Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katina PF, Keating CB (2016) Complex system governance development: a first generation methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 43–74

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCullough M (2004) Digital ground: architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whitney K, Bradley JM, Baugh DE, Chesterman CW Jr (2015) Systems theory as a foundation for governance of complex systems. Int J Syst Syst Eng 6(1/2):15–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schoenberg, M. (2022). Context in Complex Systems Governance. In: Keating, C.B., Katina, P.F., Chesterman Jr., C.W., Pyne, J.C. (eds) Complex System Governance. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93852-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93852-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93851-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93852-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics