Skip to main content

Design of Open-Source Medical Devices for Improved Usability and Risk Minimization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering Open-Source Medical Devices

Abstract

Safe performance is essential for any medical technology and its assurance a requirement for reaching market and, hence, making societal impacts. Consequently, a wide set of methodologies, techniques and international standards propose strategies for detecting and minimizing design, manufacturing and operational risks and deal with the analysis and assessment of potential use errors and malfunctions during the operation of healthcare technologies. Open-source medical devices (OSMDs) are typically designed in a collaborative way, involving truly international and multicultural development teams and following development life cycles, through which the information is shared, and also manipulated and updated, within large communities of “makers”. Besides, OSMDs are sometimes manufactured and delivered through still unconventional supply chains. As compared with traditional in-house developments, open-source approaches bring new uncertainties to the process and related potential hazards, if systematic methods for promoting usability and minimizing risks are not adequately shared in the open-source community, applied and documented. At the same time, the openness of information throughout the whole development process should, ideally, promote design peer-review and failure detection at earlier stages, if the design principles for OSMDs and their special features are correctly considered.

In consequence, this chapter is prepared with the intention of summarizing the more relevant techniques and standards for usability promotion and risk minimization in biomedical engineering (BME) tasks linked to healthcare technology development. In addition, the final purpose is presenting an innovative and straightforward – user-friendly – methodology for developing intrinsically safe medical technologies, based on internationally accepted techniques and standards, and directly transferable to open-source medical devices. To illustrate the described methods and techniques, several case studies for electromedical devices, invasive devices, standalone software and protecting splints, among others, are presented, which serve to give proof of the flexibility and scalability of this method. Some key aspects linked to applying these methods to projects emerging from open-innovation schemes and delivered as open-source medical devices and technologies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brooke, J. (1996, September). SUS – A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Communities. (1993, July 12). COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices – ANNEX I. Official Journal of the European Communities, 36, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2017, May 5). Regulation 2017/745 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union, 1–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Electrotechnical Commission. (2015). IEC 62366-1:2015 Medical devices – Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices (1st ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Electrotechnical Commission. (2016). IEC TR 62366-2:2016 Medical devices – Part 2: Guidance on the application of usability engineering to medical devices (1st ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2007). ISO 14971:2007 Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices (2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices – Quality management systems – Requirements for regulatory purposes (3rd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B., & Ainsworth, L. (1992). A guide to task analysis: The task analysis working group. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayberry, J. F. (2007). The design and application of effective written instructional material: A review of published work. Postgraduate medical journal, 83(983), 596–598. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2006.053538

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ravizza, A., Díaz Lantada, A., Ballesteros Sánchez, L., Sternini, F., & Bignardi, C. (2019). Techniques for usability risk assessment during medical device design. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies – Volume 1: Biodevices. ISBN 978-989-758-353-7, pp. 207–214. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007483102070214.

  • Sternini, F., et al. (2021). Usability assessment of an intraoperative planning software. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies 483–492 (SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010252904830492.

  • U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2016, February 3). Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Retrieved from internet website (last access in December 2021). https://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/.../ucm259760.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the UBORA “Euro-African Open Biomedical Engineering e-Platform for Innovation through Education” project, funded by the European Union’s “Horizon 2020” research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 731053.

Adrián Martínez Cendrero and Rodrigo Zapata Martínez are acknowledged for their support with personalized design procedures linked to the face splint case study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alice Ravizza or Andrés Díaz Lantada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ravizza, A. et al. (2022). Design of Open-Source Medical Devices for Improved Usability and Risk Minimization. In: Ahluwalia, A., De Maria, C., Díaz Lantada, A. (eds) Engineering Open-Source Medical Devices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79363-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics