Abstract
Feuerstein’s Structural Cognitive Modifiability and Mediated Learning Experience theory (SCM-MLE, Feuerstein, in: Presseisen (ed) Learning and thinking styles: Classroom interaction, National Education Association, 1990; Feuerstein et al., The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device—Theory instruments and techniques, University Park Press, 1979a; Feuerstein et al., in American Journal of Mental Deficiency 83:539–550, 1979; Feuerstein et al., in: Lidz (ed), Dynamic assessment, Guilford, 1987; Feuerstein et al., Don’t accept me as i am, Plenum, 1988; Feuerstein et al., The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind, Oxford University Press, 2002) deals with the interaction between the individual and his/her social and cultural environment and its effects on intellectual development and cognitive modifiability. The basic assumption of the SCM theory is that human cognitive system is characterized by plasticity and modifiability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bowlby, J. (1980). Loss: Sadness & depression: Attachment and loss (Vol. 3) (International psycho-analytical library no. 109). Hogarth Press.
Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 272–305). Cambridge University Press.
Brownstein, B. (2001). Collaboration: The foundation of learning in the future. Education, 122, 240–247.
Case, R. (1978). Intellectual development from birth to adulthood: A neo Piagetian interpretation. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 37–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cai, D., Georgiou, G. K., Wen, M., & Das, J. P. (2016). The role of planning in different mathematical skills. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 234–241.
Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1973). Interactions between mothers and their young children: Characteristics and consequences. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(6–7, Serial No. 153).
Clarke-Stewart, A. (1993). Daycare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes. Allyn & Bacon.
Deutsch, R. M. (2017). Reliability, validity, and educational use of the Cognitive Abilities Profile. PhD thesis, Division of Language and Communication Science, City University, London.
Elliott, J. (1993). Assisted assessment: If it is dynamic why is it so rarely employed? Educational and Child Psychology, 10, 48–58.
Falik, L. H., & Feuerstein, R. (1990). Structural cognitive modifiability: A new cognitive perspective for counseling and psychotherapy. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 2.
Feuerstein, R. (1969). The instrumental enrichment method: An outline of theory and technique. Hadassah-Wizo-Canada Research Institute.
Feuerstein, R. (1990). The theory of structural cognitive modifiability. In B. Presseisen (Ed.), Learning and thinking styles: Classroom interaction (pp. 68–135). National Education Association.
Feuerstein, R., & Feuerstein, S. (1991). Mediated learning experience: A theoretical review. In R. Feuerstein, P. S. Klein, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Mediated learning experience (MLE) (p. 352). London: Freund.
Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The learning propensity assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. ICELP Press.
Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Jensen, M. R. (1986). Learning potential assessment device-manual. Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979a). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device—Theory instruments and techniques. University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1979b). Cognitive modifiability in retarded adolescents: Effects of instrumental enrichment. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 539–550.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller. R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Jensen, M. R., Kaniel, S., & Tzuriel, D. (1987). Prerequisites for assessment of learning potential: The LPAD model. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 35–51). Guilford.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. E. (1988). Don’t accept me as i am. Plenum.
Frisby, C. L., & Braden, J. P. (1992). Feuerstein’s dynamic testing approach: A semantic, logical, and empirical critique. Journal of Special Education, 26, 281–301.
Goldberg, E. (2002). The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind. Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, K. H. (2014). Cognitive enrichment advantage. In L. Green (Ed.), Schools as thinking communities (pp. 141–160). Van Schaik Publishers.
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75–111.
Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P., & Burns, S. (1992). Bright start: Cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge.
Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.
Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.). (1992). Interactive assessment. Springer-Verlag.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. Wiley.
Hunt, J. M. (1961). Intelligence and experience. Ronald.
Isman, E., & Tzuriel, D. (2008). The mediated learning experience (MLE) in a three generational perspective. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 545–560.
Kaniel, S., Tzuriel, D., Feuerstein, R., Ben-Shachar, N., & Eitan, T. (1991). Dynamic assessment, learning, and transfer abilities of Jewish Ethiopian immigrants to Israel. In R. Feuerstein, P. S. Klein & A. Tannenbaum (Eds.) Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) (pp. 179–209). London: Freund.
Klein, P. S. (1988). Stability and change in interaction of Israeli mothers and infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 55–70.
Klein, P. S. (1996). Early intervention, cross-cultural experiences with a mediational approach. Garland.
Klein, P. S., & Alony, S. (1993). Immediate and sustained effects of maternal mediation behaviors in infancy. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 177–193.
Klein, P. S., Weider, S., & Greenspan, S. I. (1987). A theoretical overview and empirical study of mediated learning experience: Prediction of preschool performance from mother-infant interaction patterns. Infant Mental Health Journal, 8, 110–129.
Klein, P. S., Zarur, S., & Feldman, R. (2003). Mediational behaviors of preschoolers teaching their younger siblings. Infant and Child Development, 12, 233–242.
Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Brighton, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1995). Mediated learning tools and psychological tools: Vygotsky’s and Feuerstein’s perspectives in study of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 67–75.
Kronenberg, B. (1990). Feuerstein structural cognitive modifiability (SCM) and Kriegler, S., van Niekerk, H. (1993). IE: A contribution to cultivating a culture of learning? International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 3, 21–26.
Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2, 3436–3448.
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. Guilford.
Lidz, C. S. (2003). Early childhood assessment. Wiley.
Luther, M., & Wyatt, F. (1989). A comparison of Feuerstein’s method of (LPAD) assessment with conventional IQ testing on disadvantaged North York high school students. Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 1, 49–64.
Luria, A. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes. Harper and Row.
Moll, L. C. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Naglieri, J. A. (2015). 100 years of intelligence testing: Moving from traditional IQ to second-generation intelligence tests. In S. Goldstein, D. Princiotta, & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of intelligence: Evolutionary theory, historical perspective, and current concepts (pp. 295–316). Springer.
Rey, A. (1934). D’un proc6d pour evaluer l’educabilite (quelques applications en psychopathologie) [A procedure for assessing educability (applications to psychopathology)]. Archives de Psychologie, 24, 297–337.
Rhodes, L. K., & Bellamy, T. (1999). Choices and consequences in the reform of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 50, 17–26.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
Samuels, M., Tzuriel, D., & Malloy-Miller, T. (1989). Dynamic testing of children with learning difficulties. In R. T. Brown & M. Chazan (Eds.), Learning difficulties and emotional problems (pp. 145–166). Detselig Enterprises.
Santostefano, S. (1978). A biodevelopmental approach to clinical child psychology. Wiley.
Schaffer, H. R., & Emerson, P. E. (1964). The development of social attachments in infancy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29(3), serial number 94.
Shamir, A., & Tzuriel, D. (2004). Children’s mediational teaching style as a function of intervention for cross-age peer-mediation. School Psychology International, 25, 59–78.
Shamir, A., Tzuriel, D., & Guy, R. (2007). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive effects of a peer-mediation intervention. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6, 373–394.
Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Infant-caregiver attachment and patterns of adaptation in preschool: The roots of maladaptation and competence. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia in Child Psychology (Vol. 16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Sroufe, L. A., & Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 48, 1184–1199.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press.
Tzuriel, D. (1989). Inferential cognitive modifiability in young socially disadvantaged and advantaged children. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 1, 65–80.
Tzuriel, D. (1991). Cognitive modifiability mediated learning experience and affective motivational processes: A transactional approach. In R. Feuerstein, P. S. Klein, & A. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) (pp. 95–120). Freund.
Tzuriel, D. (1992a). The development of ego identity at adolescence among Israeli Jews and Arabs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 551–571.
Tzuriel, D. (1992b). The children’s inferential thinking modifiability (CITM) test manual. Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar-Ilan University.
Tzuriel, D. (1992c). The dynamic testing approach: A reply to Frisby and Braden. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 302–324.
Tzuriel, D. (1995). The Cognitive Modifiability Battery (CMB): Assessment and intervention—Manual. Bar-Ilan University.
Tzuriel, D. (1996). Mother-child mediated learning strategies in free-play and structured situations among low-, medium-, and high-SES levels. Child Development and Care, 126, 57–82.
Tzuriel, D. (1997). A novel dynamic assessment approach for young children: Major dimensions and current research. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 83–108.
Tzuriel, D. (1998). Children’s Seriational Thinking Modifiability (CSTM) Test. Instruction Manual. School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
Tzuriel, D. (1999). Parent-child mediated learning transactions as determinants of cognitive modifiability: Recent research and future directions. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 125, 109–156.
Tzuriel, D. (2000a). The Seria-Think instrument: Development of a dynamic test for young children. School Psychology International, 21, 177–194.
Tzuriel, D. (2000b). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 385–435.
Tzuriel, D. (2000c). The cognitive modifiability battery: Assessment and intervention. In C. S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 375–406). Elsevier Science.
Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Tzuriel, D. (2013). Mediated learning experience strategies and cognitive modifiability. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 13, 59–80.
Tzuriel, D. (2014). Mediated learning experience (MLE) and cognitive modifiability: Theoretical aspects and research applications. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 10, 16–49.
Tzuriel, D. (2018). Mother-child mediated learning experience strategies and children’s cognitive modifiability: Theoretical and research perspectives. In V. Trif (Ed.), Educational psychology—Between certitudes and uncertainties. London: IntechOpen.
Tzuriel, D., & Caspi, R. (2017). Intervention for peer-mediation and mother-child interaction: The effects on children’s mediated learning strategies and cognitive modifiability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 302–323.
Tzuriel, D., & Ernst, D. (1990). Cognitive modifiability of young children and mother child mediated learning experience (MLE) interaction in low-, medium, and high SES. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 119–135.
Tzuriel, D., Eshel-Kedmi, G. & Passig, D. (2021). Cognitive modifiability in 3D-IVR and 2D computerized environments: The effects of rotation of information resources and shift of viewing angles. Sustainability, 13, 3520.
Tzuriel, D., & Gerafy, O. (1998). Changes in teachers’ attitudes and mediational teaching as a function of dynamic assessment training. Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Tzuriel, D., & Hanuka-Levy, D. (2014). Siblings’ mediated learning strategies in families with and without children with intellectual disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119, 565–588.
Tzuriel, D., & Hanuka-Levy, D. (2019). Mother-child and siblings’ mediated learning strategies in families with and without children with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 95, 1–12.
Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Zeliger, M., Friedman, A., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Effects of the Bright Start program in kindergarten on use of mediated learning strategies and children’s cognitive modifiability. Child Development and Care, 143, 1–20.
Tzuriel, D., & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 359–380.
Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1985). Analogical thinking modifiability in disadvantaged, regular, special education and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539–552.
Tzuriel, D., & Rokach, G. (2009, July). Sibling’s mediated learning strategies in Jewish families with many versus few children: The relation to home support and religious orientation and their effects on cognitive modifiability. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology (IACEP), University of Osnabrṻck, Germany.
Tzuriel, D., & Samuels, M. T. (2000). Dynamic assessment of learning potential: Inter-rater reliability of deficient cognitive functions, type of mediation, and non-intellective factors. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1, 1–23.
Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer-mediation with young children (PMYC) on children’s cognitive modifiability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 143–165.
Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2010). Mediation strategies and cognitive modifiability in young children as a function of peer-mediation with young children (PMYC) program and training in analogies versus math tasks. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9, 48–72.
Tzuriel, D., & Shomron, V. (2018) The effects of mother—child mediated learning strategies on cognitive modifiability and psychological resilience of children with learning disability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 236–260.
Tzuriel, D., & Weiss, S. (1998). The effects of mothers’ acceptance/rejection attitudes, children's personality, and mothers' mediated learning strategies on cognitive modifiability. Early Development and Parenting, 7, 79–99.
Tzuriel, D., & Weitz, A. (1998). Mother-child mediated learning experience (MLE) strategies and children’s cognitive modifiability among very low birth weight (VLBW) and normally born weight (NBW) children. Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University.
Tzuriel, D., & Weitz, A. (2008). Mother-child mediated learning experience (MLE) strategies and child’s cognitive modifiability among very low birth weight (VLBW) and normally born weight (NBW) children. Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University.
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children’s action. Wiley.
Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Blackwell.
van Geert, P. (1994). Vygotskian dynamics of development. Human Development, 37, 346–365.
Vaught, S. R., & Haywood, H. C. (1990). Interjudge agreement in dynamic assessment: Two instruments from the Learning Potential Assessment Device. The Thinking Teacher, 5(1–6), 11–13.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Harvard University Press.
Wechsler, D. (1989). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence—Revised. The Psychological Corporation.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1992). L.S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 548–557.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tzuriel, D. (2021). The Theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability and Mediated Learning Experience (SCM-MLE). In: Mediated Learning and Cognitive Modifiability. Social Interaction in Learning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75692-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75692-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75691-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75692-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)