Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse the rice production system in the lower Mondego Valley, in Portugal, in order to understand the main concerns of farmers and risk perception. A field survey was conducted and rice production systems as well as marketing systems were analysed. A study on the worries was also made and a correlational attempt was done, considering different types of risk. The results show a production system strongly oriented by agricultural policies and agri-environmental measures. The perceived risks mainly arise from rice production costs, prices and their relative instability which results from the uncertainty about the evolution of worldwide demand and production, and from the effects of global changes. However, the choices made by farmers, who possess sound knowledge of agricultural policies and marketing systems, are not completely correlated with their risk perceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Duong, T., Brewer, T., Luck, J., Zander, K.: A global review of farmers’ perceptions of agricultural risks and risk management strategies. Agriculture 9(1), 10 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crane, L., Gantz, G., Isaacs, S., Jose, D., Sharp, R.: Introduction to Risk Management: Understanding Agricultural Risks. Extension Risk Management Education and Risk Management Agency (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahsan, D., Roth, E.: Farmers’ perceived risks and risk management strategies in an emerging mussel aquaculture industry in Denmark. Mar. Resour. Econ. 25(3), 309–323 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harwood, J., Heifner, R., Coble, K., Perry, J., Somwaru, A.: Managing risk in farming: concepts, research, and analysis. Agricultural Economic Report. No, 774 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Girdžiūtė, L.: Risks in agriculture and opportunities of their integrated evaluation. Procedia –Soc. Behav. Sci. 62, 783–790 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Komarek, A., De Pinto, A., Smith, V.: A review of types of risks in agriculture: what we know and what we need to know. Agric. Syst. 178, 102738 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waage J., Mumford, J.: Agricultural biosecurity. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363(1492), 863–876 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keil, M., Wallace, L., Turk, D., Dixon-Randall, G., Nulden, U.: An investigation of risk perception and risk propensity on the decision to continue a software development project. J. Syst. Softw. 53, 145–157 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sjöberg, L.: World views, political attitudes and risk perception. Risk-Health, Saf. Environ. 9, 137–152 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hardaker, J., Huirne, R., Anderson, J.: Coping with risk in agriculture, Cab International, Wallingford, UK (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OECD: Risks that Matter: Main Findings from the 2018 OECD Risks that Matter Survey (2019). https://www.oecd.org/social/risks-that-matter.htm

  12. Winsen, W., Mey, Y., Ludwig, L., Passel, S., Vancauteren, M., Wauters, E.: Cognitive mapping: a method to elucidate and present farmers’ risk perception. Agric. Syst. 122, 42–52 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dantsis, T., Douma, C., Giourga, C., Loumou, A., Polychronaki, E.: A methodological approach to assess and compare the sustainability level of agricultural plant production systems. Ecol. Ind. 10, 256–263 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vagias, W.: Likert-type scale response anchors, Clemson International Institute for Management. Clemson University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. INE: Farm Structure Survey 2016, INE, I,P (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chartier, O., Cronin, E., Jongeneel, A., van Asseldonk, M., Bergevoet, M., Cordier, J., Bocci, M.: Study on risk management in EU agriculture: Final report. European Commission (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Székely, C., Pálinkás, P.: Agricultural risk management in the european union and in the USA. Studies in Agricultural Economics, No. 109, pp. 55–72 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mishra, A., El-Osta, H.: Risk management through enterprise diversification: a farm-level analysis. American Agricultural Economics Association, 28–31 July 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was conducted within Project MEDWATERICE, PRIMA/0005/2018. This work is financed by national funds through FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project «Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society-CERNAS: UIDB/00681/2020».

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria de Fátima Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Fátima Oliveira, M. et al. (2021). Risks Perceptions on Rice Production: Baixo Mondego, Portugal. In: da Costa Sanches Galvão, J.R., et al. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability (ICoWEFS 2021). ICoWEFS 2021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75315-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics