Skip to main content

Santa’s Little Helper and Star of Instagram, Elf on the Shelf: Gendered Labour, Normalising Surveillance and Digitising a Childhood Phenomenon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 23))

Abstract

The Elf on the Shelf (EotS) has become—as well as being a best-selling book and toy of the same name—a cultural phenomenon. As a Christmas tradition, the EotS only dates back to 2005, but has quickly gained hold in homes across the world. For the marketers of EotS, it’s also a huge money-spinner, earning millions worldwide. Originally self-published as a book by a retired teacher in 2005, the EotS book now sells with an EotS toy who sits on the shelf and, according to its story, reports back to Santa any ‘naughty or nice’ behaviour of the resident children. The EotS resides in many homes and schools pre-Christmas, giving parents and teachers leverage in the lead up to Christmas. EotS can also be viewed as a more sinister societal surveillance tool, normalising the panopticon and making parents complicit with the concept of omnipresent spying. While ‘magical’ rather than technological, EotS could nevertheless be seen as normalising and promoting a parentally-endorsed surveillance (and consumer) culture. Simultaneously, the EotS also has become both a chore and a source of fun for parents of Santa believers globally, as parents (mostly mothers) each night change the Elf’s location and position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abidin, C. (2015). Micromicrocelebrity: Branding babies on the internet. M/C Journal, 18(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media+ Society, 2(2), 2056305116641342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abidin, C. (2017). # familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media+ Society, 3(2), 2056305117707191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, C. (2019a). How influencer ‘mumpreneur’ bloggers and ‘everyday’ mums frame presenting their children online. Media International Australia, 170(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, C. (2019b). Social media influencers, post-feminism and neoliberalism: How mum bloggers’ ‘playbour’ is reshaping public relations. Public Relations Inquiry, 8(2), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, C. (2019c). Pre-schooler as brand extension: A tale of Pixie’s bows and birthdays. In L. Green, D. Holloway, K. Stevenson, & K. Jaunzems (Eds.), Digitising early childhood (p. 58). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranyai, R. (2015, December 11). Elf on the Shelf trend mirrors loss of privacy. The Sudbury Star. Retrieved from https://www.thesudburystar.com/2015/12/11/elf-on-the-shelf-trend-mirrors-loss-of-privacy/wcm/5ec030a5-3e89-328d-97bc-a472fa5b82ec

  • Batinga, G. L., Pinto, M. d. R., & Resende, S. P. (2017). Christmas, consumption and materialism: Discourse analysis of children’s Christmas letters. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 19(66), 557–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1989). Materialism and the modern U.S. Christmas. In E. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretive consumer research (pp. 115135). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research. Retrieved from https://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conferenceproceedings.aspx?Id=12180

  • Belk, R. W., & Bryce, W. (1993). Christmas shopping scenes: From modern miracle to postmodern mall. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(3), 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, T., & Bäckman, L. (2013). Marketing and PR in Social Media: How the utilization of Instagram builds and maintains customer relationships. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A625012&dswid=-573

  • Bindley, K. (2018, December 12). The tyranny of the Elf on the Shelf: Where to put him tonight? Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-tyranny-of-the-elf-on-the-shelf-where-to-put-him-tonight-11544634142

  • Blount, J. (2019). Want Instagram followers? Here are 80 tools for growing your brand in 2020. Forbes Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/joresablount/2019/10/05/want-instagram-followers-heres-80-tools-for-growing-your-brand-in-2020/#78e3c69d1bb0

  • Blum-Ross, A., & Livingstone, S. (2017). “Sharenting,” parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular Communication, 15(2), 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewis, J., & Warren, S. (2011). Have yourself a merry little Christmas? Organizing Christmas in women’s magazines past and present. Organization, 18(6), 747–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalklen, C., & Anderson, H. (2017). Mothering on Facebook: Exploring the privacy/openness paradox. Social Media+ Society, 3(2), 2056305117707187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, G. Y., & Lewallen, J. (2018). “Say Instagram, Kids!”: Examining sharenting and children’s digital representations on Instagram. Howard Journal of Communications, 29(2), 140–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. T. (2008). The missing child in consumption theory. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danno, M. (2019). Digital 2019: Australia social media usage is growing. Retrieved from: https://wearesocial.com/au/blog/2019/02/digital-report-australia

  • De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagar, T., & Dann, S. (2016). Classifying the narrated# selfie: Genre typing human-branding activity. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1835–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Arnold, S. J. (1990). More than a labor of love: Gender roles and Christmas gift shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L., & Bell, S. (2013). Women’s magazines as facilitators of Christmas rituals. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(3), 336–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2017). Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(10), 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and children’s data: The Internet of toys and things for children. Media International Australia, 170(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The Internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice, 2(4), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1266124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. (2019). Communication, culture, and governance in Asia: “We connect with people through stories”: Gender and affective labor in Momblogging. International Journal of Communication, 13(20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, R. (2019). Elf on the shelf: 2019 will be ‘the biggest year in UK market’ for the brand. ToyNews. Retrieved from https://www.toynews-online.biz/2019/09/17/elf-on-the-shelf-2019-will-be-the-biggest-year-in-uk-market-for-the-brand/

  • Iqani, M., & Schroeder, J. E. (2016). # selfie: Digital self-portraits as commodity form and consumption practice. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(5), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (1998). The children’s culture reader. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leaver, T. (2017). Intimate surveillance: Normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online. Social Media+ Society, 3(2), 2056305117707192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levett, D. (2019). OPINION Instagram removing likes is about money, not mental health, Mumbrella. Retrieved from https://mumbrella.com.au/instagram-removing-likes-is-about-money-not-mental-health-589970

  • Lopez, L. K. (2009). The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: Redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society, 11(5), 729–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lup, K., Trub, L., & Rosenthal, L. (2015). Instagram# instasad?: Exploring associations among Instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(5), 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D., Pedersen, S., & Thomas, G. M. (2016). Parenting and digital media: From the early web to contemporary digital society. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 730–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1 75), 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, A. (2019). Instagram, Facebook crack down on harmful weight loss products and cosmetic procedures, ABC Triple J Hack. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/instagram-weight-loss-posts/11528822

  • Pinjamaa, N., & Cheshire, C. (2016). Blogs in a changing social media environment: Perspectives on the future of blogging in Scandinavia (2016). Research papers. 17. Retrieved from Http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/17

  • Pinto, L., & Nemorin, S. (2014). Who’s the boss? “The elf on the shelf” and the normalization of surveillance. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Retrieved from https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/who%E2%80%99s-boss

  • Ridgway, J. L., & Clayton, R. B. (2016). Instagram unfiltered: Exploring associations of body image satisfaction, Instagram# selfie posting, and negative romantic relationship outcomes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(1), 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft, T. M., & Baym, N. K. (2015). What does the selfie say? Investigating a global phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 9(Feature), 1588–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, A., Varsani, N., & Diedrichs, P. C. (2017). # fitspo or# loveyourself? The impact of fitspiration and self-compassion Instagram images on women’s body image, self-compassion, and mood. Body Image, 22, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiidenberg, K., & Whelan, A. (2017). Sick bunnies and pocket dumps: “Not-selfies” and the genre of self-representation. Popular Communication, 15(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiidenberg, K., & Baym, N. K. (2017). Learn it, buy it, work it: Intensive pregnancy on Instagram. Social Media+ Society, 3(1), 2056305116685108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachhani, S. J., & Pullen, A. (2011). Home is where the heart is? Organizing women’s work and domesticity at Christmas. Organization, 18(6), 807–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Archer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Archer, C., Leaver, T. (2021). Santa’s Little Helper and Star of Instagram, Elf on the Shelf: Gendered Labour, Normalising Surveillance and Digitising a Childhood Phenomenon. In: Holloway, D., Willson, M., Murcia, K., Archer, C., Stocco, F. (eds) Young Children’s Rights in a Digital World. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65916-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics