Skip to main content

Gender Salience in Women’s Career-Related Networking: Interviews with Russian Women

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Networks in the Global World V (NetGloW 2020)

Abstract

Networking is closely related to personal social capital and, in turn, career outcomes. Stable reproduction of gender inequality in organizations is largely connected to career-related networking opportunities and constraints both for men and women, and this area remains under-researched. In this study we tested the hypothesis that women perceive female gender as a significant constraint in their career development. Also, we tried to find specific situations in work relationships which make networking difficult for women. The main method was qualitative analysis of 51 semi-structured interviews with working women (mean age 33 years old). The pilot study revealed that women were not willing to support “feministic talks” and could hardly recall any difficult gender-related work relationships. We found a facilitating technique through visualizing their career paths, which resulted in spontaneous flashbacks. 57% of the respondents had experienced reminders about gender from co-workers. The reality of the “gender factor” in their professional networking was encountered by women as an unpleasant discovery accompanied with feelings of powerlessness and shame. Negative or humorous gendered interactions (used mostly by men) serve for psychological distance regulation and instrumental aims, setting gender subordination and power. Situations which make networking difficult include explicit or implicit notifications from colleagues that feminine gender is an obstacle for productive work and implies certain restrictions and requirements, motherhood (expected or actual), and sexual interest from male colleagues. We concluded that women assess gender as a visible and at the same time invisible variable affecting their career. There are a number of situations which make career networking constrained for women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jokinen, T., Brewster, C., Suutari, V.: Career capital during international work experiences: Contrasting self-initiated expatriate experiences and assigned expatriation. Int. J. Hum. Resource Manag. 19(6), 979–998 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartol, K.M., Zhang, X.: Networks and leadership development: Building linkages for capacity acquisition and capital accrual. Hum. Resource Manag. Rev. 17(4), 388–401 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spurk, D., Kauffeld, S., Barthauer, L., Heinemann, N.S.R.: Fostering networking behavior, career planning and optimism, and subjective career success: An intervention study. J. Vocat. Behav. 87, 134–144 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorius, S.F., Firebaugh, G.: Trends in global gender inequality. Soc. Forces 88(5), 1941–1968 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Acker, J.: Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender Soc. 20(4), 441–464 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Britton, D.M.: The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender Soc. 14(3), 418–434 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, N.: A network theory of social capital. Handbook Soc. Capital 50(1), 69 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forret, M.L., Dougherty, T.W.: Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women? J. Organ. Behav. 25(3), 419–437 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurieva, S.D., Mararitsa, L.V., Belova, O.E. Sotsialno-psikhologicheskii fenomen “stekliannogo potolka” v professionalnoi karere zhenshchin [Socio-psychological phenomenon of the “glass ceiling” in the professional career of women]. In: Gurieva, S. D., Shaboltas A. V. (eds.) Psikhologiia XXI veka [Psychology of the XXI century], vol. 1, pp. 178–185. VVM, Saint Petersburg (2018). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tulin, M., Lancee, B., Volker, B.: Personality and social capital. Soc. Psychol. Q. 81(4), 295–318 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman, M.: Women at the top: challenges, choices and change. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumra, S., Vinnicombe, S.: Impressing for success: a gendered analysis of a key social capital accumulation strategy. Gender Work Organ. 17(5), 521–546 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ibarra, H.: Paving an alternative route: gender differences in managerial networks. Soc. Psychol. Q. 60(1), 91–102 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benschop, Y.: The micro-politics of gendering in networking. Gender Work Organ. 16(2), 217–237 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kilduff, M., Tsai, W.: Social Networks and Organizations. Sage, London (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibarra, H.: Homophily and differential returns: sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Q. 37(3), 422–447 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Greguletz, E., Diehl, M.R., Kreutzer, K.: Why women build less effective networks than men: the role of structural exclusion and personal hesitation. Hum. Relat. 72(7), 1234–1261 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Broadbridge, A., Tonge, J.: Barriers to networking for women in a UK professional service. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23(7) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shipilov, A., Labianca, G., Kalynsh, V., Kalynsh, Y.: Career-related network building behaviors, range social capital, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Proceedings, pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Duberley, J., Cohen, L.: Gendering career capital: An investigation of scientific careers. J. Vocat. Behav. 76(2), 187–197 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tharenou, P.: Does mentor support increase women’s career advancement more than men’s? The differential effects of career and psychosocial support. Australian J. Manag. 30(1), 77–109 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Linehan, M., Scullion, H., Walsh, J.S.: Barriers to women’s participation in international management. European Business Review (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Belotti, E.: Qualitative networks: Mixed Methods in Sociological Research. Routledge, Oxon, England/New York, NY (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Hollstein, B.: Qualitative approaches. The Sage handbook of social network analysis, pp. 404–416 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualit. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mararitsa, L.V., Potiavina, V.V.: Socialnyi kapital kak faktor razvitiya kar’ery [Social capital as a factor in career development]. In: Social Psychology in the Educational Space. Proceeding of the 1st International scientific and practical conference (October 16–17, 2013), pp. 278–279. Moscow (2013). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Collins, R.: The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. SuperJob. Research Center. Russian men don’t take maternity leave. https://www.superjob.ru/research/articles/111910/rossijskie-muzhchiny-v-dekret-ne-hodyat. Accessed 29 May 2020. (In Russian)

  30. Bozionelos, N.: Intra-organizational network resources: how they relate to career success and organizational commitment. Person. Rev. 37(3), 249–263 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khasbulatova, O.A.: Tekhnologii sozdaniia mifa o ravnopravii polov: sovetskie praktiki [Technologies for creating the myth of gender equality: Soviet practices]. Woman in Russian Soc. 4, 49–59 (2018). (In Russian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Spoor, J.R., Schmitt, M.T.: “Things are getting better” isn’t always better: Considering women’s progress affects perceptions of and reactions to contemporary gender inequality. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 33(1), 24–36 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Glick, P., Fiske, S.T.: Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychol. Women Q. 35(3), 530–535 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mednick, M., Thomas, V.: Women and achievement. Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories, pp. 625–651 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Steele, C.M., Aronson, J.: Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 797–811 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grabow, H., Kühl, M.: You don’t bend it like Beckham if you’re female and reminded of it: Stereotype threat among female football players. Front. Psychol. 10, 1963 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dunbar, R.I.: The anatomy of friendship. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22(1), 32–51 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Gee, L.K., Jones, J.J., Fariss, C.J., Burke, M., Fowler, J.H.: The paradox of weak ties in 55 Countries. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 133, 362–372 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McPherson, J.M., Smith-Lovin, L.: Women and weak ties: differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations. Am. J. Sociol. 87(4), 883–904 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, J.: Networking in the workplace: implications for women’s career development. New Directions Adult Continuing Educ. 122, 33–42 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would appreciate feedback and comments on the paper from its readers. We are very grateful to our colleagues who helped us with data collection and processing: Katrina Aleksandrova, Olga Gundelach, Elizaveta Osmak, and Uliyana Udavikhina. The authors are also very thankful to all participants in this project for their time and interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Kazantseva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-013-00686 A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kazantseva, T., Mararitsa, L., Gurieva, S. (2021). Gender Salience in Women’s Career-Related Networking: Interviews with Russian Women. In: Antonyuk, A., Basov, N. (eds) Networks in the Global World V. NetGloW 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 181. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64877-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics