Skip to main content

Emotions and Technoethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotions in Technology Design: From Experience to Ethics

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

The relationship between emotions and ethics has been debated for centuries. The act of understanding emotions through the framework of ethics involves accepting that emotions are to some extent culturally dependent. By linking emotions in design to larger ethical discussions, it may be accepted that ethics and design are both technological constructions designed to shape a collective worldview. While both are cultural constructions, they are in constant dialogue with one another through social discourse and individualistic cognitive–affective appraisal processes. This chapter presents an account of technoethics that challenges ideas of ethical values embedded within technology, drawing attention to the role of human intentionality as a definitive ethical factor in human–technology relationships. The chapter problematises simplistic views of ethics and emotional technology experience to reveal the ambiguous and dynamic nature of cognitive–emotional–cultural interdependencies in technology experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Facebook’s controversial ‘Sophia’ (see https://www.facebook.com/realsophiarobot/) is one of the social media’s first public campaigns to integrate AI and seek public acceptance. Controversy regarding its development ranges from the role of personal data in its development to accounts of Facebook ‘staging’ Sophia’s intelligence in a Wizard-of-Oz (puppetry) type manner.

  2. 2.

    It could be argued that technology always mediates human interactions, for example, via computer systems, in the context of architecture (classrooms, schools, homes, etc.) or commerce (cafes, restaurants, shopping malls). Yet in this instance, we are referring to the unfiltered, direct means of communication from one individual to another.

  3. 3.

    Nicholas Salas (2013) provides an interesting account of the development of Volkswagen from Hitler to the US market. See https://thevisualcommunicationguy.com/2013/07/03/how-adolf-hitlers-ideal-car-became-an-american-favorite-a-visual-analysis-of-the-volkswagon-beetle/.

  4. 4.

    Hammurabi was the sixth king of the first Babylon dynasty (Prince, 1904). He was a god-fearing yet powerful soldier. He ensured his people’s well-being by developing an infrastructure and societal order via rules and laws. These laws instilled an understanding among his people that they should treat others how they would want to be treated.

  5. 5.

    The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) begins to influence this practice at the design level through interventions such as cookie consent banners. Yet, arguably from an ethical perspective, more can be done in terms of increasing user awareness of what cookies are and why consent is important.

References

  • Association of Internet Researchers (2020) Ethics. Retrieved 15 May 2020, from: https://aoir.org/ethics/

  • Austin JL (1975) How to do things with words, 2nd Rev edn. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer AJ (1936) Chapter VI: critiques of ethics and theology. In: Language, truth and logic. Dover Publications, New York. Retrieved 10 May 2020, from: https://ethicsintroduction.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/6/2/44624607/ayer_emotivism.pdf

  • Bahm AJ (1993) Axiology: the science of values, vol 2. Rodopi, Amsterdam, NL

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes A, Thagard P (1996) Emotional decisions. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society. University of California San Diego, pp 426–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes SB (1996) Internet relationships: the bright and dark sides of cyber-friendship. Telektronikk 92:26–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal JD (1969) The scientific and industrial revolutions. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Black M (1964) The gap between “is” and “should.” Philos Rev 73(2):165–181. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann A (2012) The collision of plausibility with reality: lifting the veil of the ethical neutrality of technology. Educ Technol 52(1):40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslavs GM (2013) Moral emotions, conscience, and cognitive dissonance. Psychol Russ 6(4):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britannica (2020) The gunpowder revolution c1300–1650. Retrieved 15 May 2020, from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/military-technology/The-gunpowder-revolution-c-1300-1650

  • Bunge M (1977) Towards a technoethics. Monist 60(1):96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon A (2018) Beyond artificial Intelligence: from Human consciousness to artificial consciousness. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo KA (2009) Nonhumans in social interaction. Ann Rev Sociol 35:531–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers DJ (1996) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. In: Toward a science of consciousness: the first Tucson discussions and debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan SY (2006) The Confucian notion of Jing (respect). Philos East West, pp 229–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen A, Treviño LK, Humphrey SE (2020) Ethical champions, emotions, framing, and team ethical decision making. J Appl Psychol 105(3):245–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JA (2010) Relations of homology between higher cognitive emotions and basic emotions. Biol Philos 25(1):75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JR, Pant L, Sharp DJ (1992) Cultural and socioeconomic constraints on international codes of ethics: lessons from accounting. J Bus Ethics 11:687–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JR, Pant LW, Sharp DJ (2001) An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. J Bus Ethics 30(4):319–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley M (1995) The myth of the moral neutrality of technology. AI Soc 9(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagleish T, Power MJ (2004) Emotion specific and emotion-non-specific components of PTSD: implications for a taxonomy of related psychopathology. Behav Res Ther 42(9):1069–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1993) Consciousness explained. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry TK, Williams TI (1960) A short history of technology from the earliest times to AD 1900, vol 231, Courier Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillers L (2020) Social and emotional robots: useful artificial intelligence in the absence of consciousness. In: Nordlinger B, Villani C, Rus D (eds) Healthcare and artificial intelligence. Springer, Cham, pp 261–267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dror Y (1957) Values and the law. Antioch Rev 17(4):440–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P (1999) Basic emotions. Handb Cogn Emot 98(16):45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrarello S (2015) Husserl’s ethics and practical intentionality. Bloomsbury Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay JN (1970) Axiological ethics. Macmillan International Higher Education, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp 150–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede D (2017) Plato's ethics: an overview. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Retrieved 5 May 2020, from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/plato-ethics/

  • Frijda NH (1993) The place of appraisal in emotion. Cogn Emot 7(3–4):357–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung YL (1953) A short history of Chinese philosophy. In: Bodde D (Trans.). Macmillan Co, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer HG (2008) Philosophical hermeneutics. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gensler HJ (2013) Ethics and the golden rule. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giles J (2006) Aboriginal remains head for home. Nature 444(7118):411. https://doi.org/10.1038/444411a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (2006) Hegemony, intellectuals and the state. In: Storey J (ed) Cultural theory and popular culture: a reader, 3rd edn. Pearson, Harlow, pp 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SK (2000) The fount of everything just and right? The ten commandments as a source of American law. J Law Relig 14(2):525–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2009) Europe: the faltering project. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J, Cronin C (1993) Justification and application: remarks on discourse ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haikonen PO (2020) On artificial intelligence and consciousness. J Artif Intell Conscious 7(01):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL (1971) Axiology—theory of values. Res 32(1):29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman RS (2011) The structure of value: foundations of scientific axiology. Wipf and Stock Publishers, Eugene

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick HW (2009) A sociotechnical systems model of organizational complexity and design and its relation to employee cognitive complexity. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 53(16). Sage Publications, Los Angeles, pp 1028–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiereth H, Prenninger P (2007) Charging the internal combustion engine. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson B (1983) Economic science and ethical neutrality: the problem of teleology. J Bus Ethics 2(4):237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1751/1998) An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. In: Beauchamp TL (ed) Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1888) Treatise to human nature. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Islamic network groups (2020) First principles of religion: treat others as you would like to be treated (The Golden Rule). Retrieved 15 May 2020, from: https://ing.org/first-principles-religion-the-golden-rule/

  • Ivanhoe PJ (1990) Reweaving the “one thread” of the analects. Philos East W 40(1):17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Shaw TR, Staples DS (2004) Toward contextualized theories of trust: the role of trust in global virtual teams. Inform Syst Res 15(3):250–256. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey C, Dilla W, Weatherholt N (2004) The impact of ethical development and cultural constructs on auditor judgments: a study of auditors in Taiwan. Bus Ethics Q 14(3):553–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1982) Technology as a subject for ethics. Soc Res 891–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph CM (2009) Is emotivism more authentic than cognitivism? Some reflections on contemporary research in moral psychology. In: Emotions, ethics, and authenticity, pp 155–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1788/2004) The critique of practical reason. In: Kingsmill T (Trans.). Dover Publishers, Mineola, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasavin IT (2020) Science and public good: max Weber’s ethical implications. Soc Epistemol 34(2):184–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S, Handelsman M, Gottlieb M, VandeCreek L (2009) Positive ethics: themes and variations. In: Lopez SJ, Snyder CR (eds) The Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman MD, Thomson AD, Guerrini I, Marshall EJ (2009) The Korsakoff syndrome: clinical aspects, psychology and treatment. Alcohol Alcohol 44(2):148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kron A, Pilkiw M, Banaei J, Goldstein A, Anderson AK (2015) Are valence and arousal separable in emotional experience? Emotion 15(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau E, Mouffe C (2014) Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. Verso Trade, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus RS, Smith CA (1988) Knowledge and appraisal in the cognition—emotion relationship. Cogn Emot 2(4):281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux JE, Brown R (2017) A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(10):E2016–E2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman KF, Green RD, Ho CC, Koch CT (2009) Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Comput Hum Behav 25(3):695–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik K (2014) The quest for a moral compass: a global history of ethics. Atlantic Books Ltd., Camden

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus HR, Kitayama S (1994) The cultural construction of self and emotion: Implications for social behavior. In: Kitayama S, Markus HR (eds) Emotion and culture: empirical studies of mutual influence. American Psychological Association, Worcester, MA, pp 89–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/10152-003

  • McGuire M (1977) Mythic rhetoric in Mein Kampf: A structuralist critique. Q J Speech 63(1):1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McNair LD, Paretti MC (2010) Activity theory, speech acts, and the ‘“doctrine of infelicity”’: connecting language and technology in globally networked learning environments. J Bus Tech Commun 24(3):323–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (2020) Technology. Retrieved 5 May 2020, from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technology

  • Mill JS (1863) Chapter 2—What utilitarianism is. Utilitarianism. Retrieved 5 May 2020, from: https://www.utilitarianism.com/mill2.htm

  • Moore GE (1959) Principia ethica, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GE (1991) The elements of ethics. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PN

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraca B (2011) The map of moral significance: a new axiological matrix for environmental ethics. Environ Values 20(3):375–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg SL, Kenrick DT, Schaller M (2011) Human threat management systems: self-protection and disease avoidance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(4):1042–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell AS, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1976) Memory and attention: an introduction to human information processing, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy N (2009) Selling Hitler: propaganda and the Nazi brand. J Public Aff Int J 9(1):55–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oatley K (1992) Best laid schemes: the psychology of the emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony A, Turner TJ (1990) What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychol Rev 97(3):315–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MB, Sznycer D, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2012) Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychol 33(3):395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince JD (1904) The code of Hammurabi. Am J Theol 8(3):601–609. Retrieved 5 May 2020, from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/478479

  • Ramsey FP (2016) Truth and probability. Readings in formal epistemology. Springer, Cham, pp 21–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson MD, Storbeck J, Meier BP, Kirkeby BS (2004) Watch out! That could be dangerous: valence-arousal interactions in evaluative processing. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30(11):1472–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousi R (2013a) From cute to content: user experience from a cognitive semiotic perspective. In: Jyväskylä studies in computing. University of Jyväskylä Press, Jyväskylä, p 171

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousi R (2013b) The experience of no experience: elevator UX and the role of unconscious experience. In: Proceedings of international conference on making sense of converging media. ACM, New York, NY, pp 289–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousi R (2014) Unremarkable experiences: designing the user experience of elevators. Swed Des Res J 11:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousi R, Saariluoma P, Leikas J (2010) Mental contents in user experience. In: Proceedings of MSE2010 V. II 2010 international conference on management and engineering, 17–18 Oct 2010. Wuhan, China, pp 204–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Lindsay PH, Norman DA (1972) A process model for long-term memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W (eds) Organization of memory. Academic Press, Cambridge, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma P (2003) Apperception, content-based psychology and design. In: Lindemann U (ed) Human behaviour in design. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 72–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma P (2020) Hume’s guillotine in designing ethically intelligent technologies. In: Taiar R, Gremeaux-Bader V, Aminian K (eds) International conference on human interaction and emerging technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma P, Leikas J (2020) Designing ethical AI in the shadow of Hume’s guillotine. In: Ahram T, Karwowski W, Vergnano A, Leali F, Taiar R (eds) International conference on intelligent human systems integration. Springer, Cham, pp 594–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma P, Maksimainen J (2012) Intentional disinformation and freedom of expression. Int Rev Soc Sci Humanit 3(2):9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma P, Rousi R (2015) Symbolic interactions: towards a cognitive scientific theory of meaning in human technology interaction. J Adv Humanit 3(3):310–324. Retrieved 10 May 2020, from: file://fileservices.ad.jyu.fi/homes/rerousi/Downloads/SYMBOLIC_ INTERACTIONSTOWARDS_A_COGNITIVE_SCIENTIFI.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter J (1995) In conversation: joint action, shared intentionality and ethics. Theor Psychol 5(1):49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson CL (1944) Ethics and language. Yale University Press, New Haven, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone J, Cooper J (2001) A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance. J Exp Soc Psychol 37(3):228–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark M (2017) Life 3.0: being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf, New York City, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P (2008) Hot thought: mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (2007) Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interact Stud 8(3):501–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull P (2007) British anatomists, phrenologists and the construction of the Aboriginal race, c. 1790–1830. Hist Compass 5(1):26–50

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2020) Some articles from the UN’s universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved 15 May 2020, from: https://news.un.org/en/tags/universal-declaration-human-rights

  • van Roojen M (2018) Moral cognitivism vs. non-cognitivism. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Retrieved 10 May 2020, from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moral-cognitivism

  • von Wright G (1963) The varieties of goodness. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck E (2017) Ethical relativity. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Museum (2017) ’67 Referendum—WA 50 years on: dispelling myths. Retrieved 15 May 2020, from: https://museum.wa.gov.au/referendum-1967/dispelling-myths

  • Winkielman P, Berridge KC (2004) Unconscious emotion. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13(3):120–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff T (2019) That’s close enough: the unfinished history of emotivism in close reading. PMLA 134(1):51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zardiashvili L, Fosch-Villaronga E (2020) Oh, Dignity too?” said the robot: human dignity as the basis for the governance of robotics. Mind Mach 30:121–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09514-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel E (1982) The standardization of time: a sociohistorical perspective. Am J Sociol 88(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pertti Saariluoma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saariluoma, P., Rousi, R. (2020). Emotions and Technoethics. In: Rousi, R., Leikas, J., Saariluoma, P. (eds) Emotions in Technology Design: From Experience to Ethics. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53483-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53483-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53482-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53483-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics