Skip to main content

Evaluating Sustainable Vehicle Technologies for Freight Transportation Using Spherical Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions (INFUS 2020)

Abstract

Freight transportation is vital for the economy and everyday life. It brings the goods and services needed for industrial and manufacturing processes, as well as those to be consumed by the population. However, the vehicles (mostly diesel trucks) used are responsible for a disproportionate amount of environmental externalities. Therefore, it is imperative to manage transport demand, and foster the use of cleaner vehicles, fuels and technologies. The most common alternatives include compressed (renewable) natural gas (CNG/RNG), hybrid electric (HE), battery electric (BE) and fuel-cell hydrogen (H2) vehicles. However, the technical and operational characteristics, market readiness, and other factors related to these technologies can be very different. Therefore, the most appropriate option for different uses (e.g., last mile, long-haul distribution) and users’ preferences is not necessarily clear. Consequently, this paper proposes Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) based on Spherical fuzzy sets to evaluate the sustainable vehicle technology alternatives over multiple criteria for freight transportation. Spherical fuzzy sets have been receiving increasing attention because of their ability to better consider uncertainty by defining membership functions on a Spherical surface and covering a larger domain. Specifically, the authors evaluate the alternatives using five criteria: Financial; Business & market-related; Environmental & legal; Maintenance & repair availability; and Safety & vehicle performance factors, and 21 sub-criteria. Moreover, the authors also performed sensitivity analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. California Air Resource Board. Advanced Clean Truck (ACT) Program. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/advanced-clean-truck/about. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  2. Jaller, M., Pineda, L., Ambrose, H.: Evaluating the use of zero-emission vehicles in last mile deliveries. UC Davis Institute of Transport Studies, University of California, Davis, CA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, B.A., Figliozzi, M.A.: A methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric delivery trucks. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 49(1), 8–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahraman, C., Kutlu Gundogdu, F., Onar, S.C., Oztaysi, B.: Hospital location selection using spherical fuzzy TOPSIS. In: 2019 Conference of the International Fuzzy Systems Association and the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT 2019). Atlantis Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.K., Kahraman, C.: A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Comput. 24(6), 4607–4621 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets and systems. Presented at the Symposium on System Theory, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Otay, İ., Jaller, M.: Multi-expert disaster risk management & response capabilities assessment using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 38(1), 835–852 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Otay, I., Jaller, M.: Multi-criteria and multi-expert wind power farm location selection using a Pythagorean fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, pp. 905–914. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pelletier, S., Jabali, O., Laporte, G.: Battery electric vehicles for goods distribution: a survey of vehicle technology, market penetration, incentives and practices. https://www.cirrelt.ca/DocumentsTravail/CIRRELT-2014-43.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2016

  11. Klemick, H., Kopits, E., Wolverton, A., Sargent, K.: Heavy-duty trucking and the energy efficiency paradox: evidence from focus groups and interviews. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77, 154–166 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, M., Wang, Q., Fulton L.: Truck Choice Modeling: Understanding California’s Transition to Zero-Emission Vehicle Trucks Taking into Account Truck Technologies, Costs, and Fleet Decision Behavior (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Rui, W., Thompson, R.G.: Analyzing truck fleets’ acceptance of alternative fuel freight vehicles in China. Renew. Energy 134, 1148–1155 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aydin, S., Kahraman, C.: Vehicle selection for public transportation using an integrated multi criteria decision making approach: a case of Ankara. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 26(5), 2467–2481 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yavuz, M., Oztaysi, B., Onar, S.C., Kahraman, C.: Multi-criteria evaluation of alternative-fuel vehicles via a hierarchical hesitant fuzzy linguistic model. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(5), 2835–2848 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wątróbski, J., Małecki, K., Kijewska, K., Iwan, S., Karczmarczyk, A., Thompson, R.G.: Multi-criteria analysis of electric vans for city logistics. Sustainability 9(8), 1453 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C.: Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36(1), 337–352 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Otay, I., Kahraman, C., Oztaysi, B., Onar, S.C.: Score and accuracy functions for different types of spherical fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of FLINS/ISKE 2020: The 14th International FLINS Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence and the 15th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, Cologne, Germany (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the National Center for Sustainable Transportation and the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California Davis for the funding support for this research. The authors also appreciate the experts surveyed in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Jaller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jaller, M., Otay, I. (2021). Evaluating Sustainable Vehicle Technologies for Freight Transportation Using Spherical Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. In: Kahraman, C., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I., Cebi, S., Tolga, A. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions. INFUS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1197. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics