Skip to main content

Cavernous Malformations of the Pineal Region: Overview, Management, and Controversies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pineal Region Lesions

Abstract

Cavernous malformations (CMs) of the brain represent low-flow vascular lesions comprised of dilated sinusoid blood vessels with thin walls, containing blood or clots in various stages of degradation. They are mostly congenital in nature, but acquired CMs have been reported, for instance, after radiotherapy. Frequently, they are discovered incidentally, and a significant number of these lesions can remain clinically silent over a long period of time. Depending on the exact location within the brain, CMs may cause epilepsy, headache, focal neurological deficit, and hemorrhagic stroke. Owing to the proximity of the pineal region to the sylvian aqueduct, a hemorrhagic presentation from a cavernoma in this location may lead to acute obstructive hydrocephalus, loss of consciousness, and, on very rare occasions, even to death. Only a small number of pineal region CMs have been described in the literature. In this chapter, we provide a short overview of pineal region CMs and their surgical management, and discuss the controversies regarding their treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choudhri O, Chen RP, Bulsara K. 21 - cavernous malformations of the brain and spinal cord. 4th ed: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-43140-8.00021-4.

  2. Iliescu BF, Poeata I. Cerebral Cavernomas. In: Popescu I, Ciuce C, editors. Tratat de Chirurgie, Editura Academiei Române, vol. VI. 2nd ed; 2014. p. 5: 402–410. Text in Romanian.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertalanffy H, Burkhardt JK, Kockro RA, Bozinov O, Sarnthein J. Resection of cavernous malformations of the brainstem Cavernous Malformations. Nerv Syst. 2011:143–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003636.016.

  4. Akers A, Al-Shahi Salman R, Awad I, Dahlem K, Flemming K, et al. Synopsis of guidelines for the clinical management of cerebral cavernous malformations: consensus recommendations based on systematic literature review by the angioma alliance scientific advisory board clinical experts panel. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(5):665–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Metellus P, Kharkar S, Kapoor S, Lin D, Rigamonti D. Cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Q. 2008;18(4):223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flemming KD. Clinical Management of Cavernous Malformations. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19:122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelmann R, Batra S, Li A, Camara-Quintana J, Rigamonti D. Epidemiology and natural history of cavernous malformations. In: Rigamonti D, editor. Cavernous malformations of the nervous system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003636.003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein HE, Solomon RA. Epidemiology of Cavernous Malformations. Vol 143. 1st ed: Elsevier B.V.; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63640-9.00023-0.

  9. Kim D, Shim K, Kim T, Chang J, Park Y, Choi J. Pineal cavernous malformations: report of two cases. 2005;46(6):851–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cristini A, Fischer C, Sindou M. Tectal Plate Cavernoma — A Special Entity of Brainstem Cavernomas. Case Report. 2004;3019(03) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00487-7.

  11. Batra S, Crain B, Engelmann R, Rigamonti D. Pathology of cavernous malformations 2011:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taslimi S, Modabbernia A, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG 2nd, Macdonald RL. Natural history of cavernous malformation: systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 studies. Neurology. 2016;86(21):1984–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ene C, Kaul A, Kim L. Natural History of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. Vol 143. 1st ed: Elsevier B.V; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63640-9.00021-7.

  14. Cannizzaro D, Sabatino G, Mancarella C, et al. Management and surgical approaches of brainstem cavernous malformations: our experience and literature review. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14(1):131–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_290_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chenisz JF, Mattozo CA, Yokoi DS, Fudalli F, Luvison L. Surgical treatment of cavernous Angiomas in the pineal gland – case report. Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia. 2018;37:242–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramina R, Mattei TA, de Aguiar PHP, Meneses MS, Ferraz VR, Aires R, et al. Surgical management of brainstem cavernous malformations. 2011;32:1013–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0477-8.

  17. Muzumdar DP, Misra BKBA. Pineal region cavernoma - case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2000;40:372–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Figueiredo A, Maheshwari S, Goel A. Cavernoma in the pineal region. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;17(5):652–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ogura T, Kambe A, Sakamoto M, Shinohara Y, Ogawa T, Kurosaki M. Superficial Siderosis associated with a pineal cavernous malformation. World Neurosurg. 2017;109:230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobayashi S, Kamagata M, Nakamura M, Nakazato Y, Sasaki T. Pineal apoplexy due to massive hemorrhage associated with cavernous Angioma. Surg Neurol. 2001;55:365–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vhora S, Kobayashi S, Okudera H. Pineal cavernous angioma presenting with Parkinsonism. 2001;8:263–6. https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.2000.0895.

  22. Aboul-enein H, Sabry AAE, Farhoud AH. Supracerebellar infratentorial approach with paramedian expansion for posterior third ventricular and pineal region lesions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;139:100–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang J, Kim D, Ph D, et al. Surgical treatment of cavernous malformation of pineal region. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2005;38:238–41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frisardi G, Iani C, Sau G, et al. A relationship between bruxism and orofacial- dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma. Behav Brain Funct. 2013;9(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-9-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang KY, Idowu OR, Lin DDM. In: 1st ed, editor. Radiology and Imaging for Cavernous Malformations. Vol 143: Elsevier B.V.; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63640-9.00024-2.

  26. Gibson CC, Zhu W, Davis CT, Bowman-Kirigin JA, Chan AC, Ling J, et al. Strategy for identifying repurposed drugs for the treatment of cerebral cavernous malformation. Circulation. 2015;131(3):289–99. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bravi L, Rudini N, Cuttano R, Giampietro C, Maddaluno L, Ferrarini L, et al. Sulindac metabolites decrease cerebrovascular malformations in CCM3-knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(27):8421–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501352112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McDonald DA, Shi C, Shenkar R, Liu F, Ginsberg MH, Marchuk DA, et al. Fasudil decreases lesion burden in a murine model of cerebral cavernous malformation disease. Stroke. 2012;43(2):571–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.625467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagy G, Razak A, Rowe JG, Hodgson TJ, Coley SC, Radatz MW, Patel UJ, Kemeny AA. Stereotactic radiosurgery for deep-seated cavernous malformations: a move toward more active, early intervention. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:691–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Monaco EA, Khan AA, Niranjan A, Kano H, Grandhi R, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of symptomatic brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(3):E11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu KD, Chung WY, Wu HM, Shiau CY, Wang LW, Guo WY, Pan DH. Gamma knife surgery for cavernous hemangiomas: an analysis of 125 patients. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(Suppl):81–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hasegawa T, McInerney J, Kondziolka D, Lee JY, Flickinger JC, Lun-sford LD. Long-term results after stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:1190–7. discussion 1197–8

    Google Scholar 

  33. Acerbi F, Corte EL, D'Incerti L, Ferroli P. Are there effective alternatives to surgery for the treatment of symptomatic brainstem cavernous malformation? World Neurosurg. 2015;83(3):313–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bertalanffy H, Gerganov VM. Microsurgical or radiosurgical management of intracranial cavernomas. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;116:103–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1376-9_16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Keezer MR, Maestro R Del. Radiation-Induced Cavernous Hemangiomas : Case Report and Literature Review 2017:303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nimjee SM, Powers CJ, Bulsara KR. Review of the literature on de novo formation of cavernous malformations of the central nervous system after radiation therapy. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;21(1):e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sheen JJ, Lee DH, Lee DH, Song Y, Kwon DH. Long-term outcome of gamma knife radiosurgery for brain Cavernoma: factors associated with subsequent De novo Cavernoma formation. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barker FG 2nd, Amin-Hanjani S, Butler WE, Lyons S, Ojemann RG, Chapman PH, Ogilvy CS. Temporal clustering of hemorrhages from untreated cavernous malformations of the central nervous system. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Choque-velasquez J, Colasanti R, Resendiz-nieves JC, Jahromi BR, Kozyrev DA, Thiarawat P, et al. Supracerebellar infratentorial paramedian approach in Helsinki neurosurgery: cornerstones of a safe and effective route to the pineal region. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chandy MJ, Damaraju SC. Benign tumours of the pineal region: a prospective study from 1983 to 1997. Br J Neurosurg. 1998;12(3):228–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688699845041.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI. Principles of treatment of the pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol. 2003;59(4):250–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00223-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Oliveira J, Cerejo A, Silva PS, Polónia P, Pereira J, Vaz R. The infratentorial supracerebellar approach in surgery of lesions of the pineal region. Surg Neurol. 2013;4:154. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.122504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kodera T, Bozinov O, Sürücü O, Ulrich NH, Burkhardt JK, Bertalanffy H. Neurosurgical venous considerations for tumors of the pineal region resected using the infratentorial supracerebellar approach. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(11):1481–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bertalanffy H. Avoidance of postoperative acute cerebellar swelling after pineal tumor surgery. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158(1):59–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2624-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bertalanffy H, Benes L, Miyazawa T, Alberti O, Siegel AM, Sure U. Cerebral Cavernomas in the Adult. Review of the Literature and Analysis of 72 Surgically Treated Patients. Vol 25.; 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101430100179.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsuji Y, Kar S, Bertalanffy H. Microsurgical Management of Midbrain Cavernous Malformations : Predictors of Outcome and Lesion Classification in 72 Patients. 2019:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz026.

  47. Maselli G, Paulis D, De Ricci A, Galzio RJ. Posterior cranial fossa tumors : Results and prognostic factors in a consecutive series of 14 operated patients by occipital transtentorial approach; 2019. p. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.99911.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Reid WS, Clark WK. Comparison of the infratentorial and transtentorial approaches to the pineal region. Neurosurgery. 1978;3(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-197807000-00001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Matsuo S, Baydin S, Güngör A, Middlebrooks EH, Komune N, Iihara K, et al. Prevention of postoperative visual field defect after the occipital transtentorial approach: anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(1):188–97. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.4.JNS162805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sonabend AM, Bowden S, Bruce JN. Microsurgical resection of pineal region tumors. J Neuro-Oncol. 2016;130(2):351–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2138-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Feletti A, Dimitriadis S, Pavesi G. Cavernous angioma of the cerebral aqueduct. World Neurosurg. 2016;98:876.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gliemroth J, Käsbeck E, Kehler U. Ventriculocisternostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in the treatment of hydrocephalus : A retrospective , long-term observational study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;122:92–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.03.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helmut Bertalanffy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bertalanffy, H., Florian, I.A., Timiș, T.L. (2020). Cavernous Malformations of the Pineal Region: Overview, Management, and Controversies. In: Florian, I.S. (eds) Pineal Region Lesions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50913-2_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics