Abstract
Breaches of cyber-security often arise unintentionally from the human user such as when switching between subtasks or external interruptions, disrupting the flow of work and leading to action slips in the execution of a task procedure [1, 2]. There has been little research into the perceived effects of task interruption and switching on computer-based tasks when such action slips can potentially compromise information security. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on nine university employees who regularly handle sensitive information, designed to identify which features of information-sensitive computer-based tasks are the most susceptible to disruption. Potential sources of human error in were identified with task interruption judged to be more likely than multitasking as a source of error. The interview findings will serve as the basis of experimental investigations into how disruptions in the flow of a task procedure can cause action slips that may compromise the handling of sensitive data. Well-informed empirical work in the area of Cyberpsychology is critical to understanding the processes involved, and to guiding potential solutions rooted in human-machine interface design and human computer interaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altmann, E.M., Trafton, J.G., Hambrick, D.Z.: Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 215–226 (2014)
Li, S.Y.W., Blandford, A., Cairns, P., Young, R.M.: The effect of interruptions on postcompletion and other procedural errors: An account based on the activation-based goal memory model. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 14, 314–328 (2008)
Nobles, C.: Botching human factors in cybersecurity in business organizations. HOLISTICA–J. Bus. Public Adm. 9(3), 71–88 (2018)
Kraemer, S., Carayon, P.: Human errors and violations in computer and information security: the viewpoint of network administrators and security specialists. Appl. Ergon. 38, 143–154 (2007)
Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Liginlal, D., Sim, I. Khansa, L., Fearn, P.: Human error and privacy breaches in healthcare organizations: causes and management strategies. In: AMCIS Proceedings. Paper 406 (2009)
Rogers, R.D., Monsell, S.: Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124, 207–231 (1995)
Pashler, H.: Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1, 44–48 (1992)
Hodgetts, H.M., Jones, D.M.: Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 35, 1120–1132 (2006)
Hodgetts, H.M., Jones, D.M.: Interruption of the tower of London task: support for a goal activation approach. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135, 103–115 (2006)
Monk, C., Trafton, J.G., Boehm-Davis, D.A.: The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 14, 299–313 (2008)
Morgan, P.L., Patrick, J., Waldron, S., King, S., Patrick, T.: Improving memory after interruption: exploiting soft constraints and manipulating information access cost. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 15, 291–306 (2009)
Morgan, P., Patrick, J.: Paying the price works: Increasing goal-state access cost improves problem solving and mitigates the effect of interruption. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 66, 160–178 (2012)
Morgan, P., Patrick, J., Tiley, L.: Improving the effectiveness of an interruption lag by inducing a memory-based strategy. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 142, 87–96 (2013)
Altmann, E.M., Trafton, J.G.: Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cogn. Sci. 26, 39–83 (2002)
Zhang, H., Singh, S., Li, X., Dahbura, A., Xie, M.: Multitasking and monetary incentive in a realistic phishing study. In: Proceedings of British HCI. BCS Learning and Development Ltd, Belfast, UK (2018)
Liu, Q., McLaughlin, A.C., Watson, B., Enck, W., Davis, A.: Multitasking increases stress and insecure behavior on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting, pp. 1110–1114 (2015)
Braun, V., Clark, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the UK National Cyber Security Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Williams, C. et al. (2020). Human Error in Information Security: Exploring the Role of Interruptions and Multitasking in Action Slips. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_80
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_80
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50731-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50732-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)