Abstract
A growing variety of actors has been producing imaginaries of metropolitan regions corresponding to their interests. The cast has been opened up from planners, academics, and local–regional–national state actors to international actors, think tanks, and management consultancies, leading to a greater variety of sometimes short-lived, competing imaginaries. The chapter aims to interrogate the motivations of the social actors actively involved in constructing the vision(s) over time. We use various examples of the European Union, German national spatial visions, Atlantic Gateway in the UK, the megaregions concept, and an expert competition the metropolitan region of Helsinki. We argue that creating spatial imaginaries is not a primary realm for planners, thus on the one hand less transported by plans or even cartographic representations of a metropolitan region and on the other hand less comprehensive as some of them follow a single purpose such as justifying infrastructure investment.
Put bluntly: it is never the spatial form that acts, but rather social actors who, embedded in particular (multidimensional) spatial forms and make use of particular (multidimensional) forms, act. The relevance of a particular spatial form … can be measured only from the perspective of the engaged actors (Mayer 2008, p. 416).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ache, P. (2011). ‘Creating futures that would otherwise not be’—Reflections on the Greater Helsinki Vision process and the making of metropolitan regions. Progress in Planning, 75(4), 155–192.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2017). Seeing Like a city. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Barnett, C., & Parnell, S. (2016). Ideas, implementation and indicators: Epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda. Environment and Urbanization, 28(1), 87–98.
BBSR [Federal Institute for Building, Urban and Regional Research]. (2012). Raumordnungsbericht [Spatial planning report] 2011. BBSR: Bonn.
BMBau [Federal Ministry for Regional Planning, Building and Urban Development]. (1993). Raumordnungspolitischer Orientierungsrahmen [Spatial planning policy orientation]. Bonn: BMBau.
EMA [European Metropolitan Associations]. (2017). Warsaw declaration. http://www.um.warszawa.pl/ema2017/Warsaw_Declaration_2017_10_20.pdf?20180825211359. Accessed March 13, 2019.
Fedeli, V., Feiertag, P., & Harrison, J. (2020). Invoking new metropolitan imaginaries: What type of metropolitan region for what kind of metropolitan planning and governance? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 173–192). Berlin: Springer.
Grazi, L. (2007). L’Europa e le città: la questione urbana nel processo di integrazione europea, 1957–1999 [Europe and cities: the urban issue in the process of European integration, 1957–1999]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Harrison, J. (2014). Rethinking city-regionalism as the production of new non-state spatial strategies: The case of Peel Holdings Atlantic Gateway Strategy. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2315–2335.
Harrison, J., & Growe, A. (2014a). From places to flows? Planning for the new ‘regional world’ in Germany. European and Urban Regional Studies, 21(1), 21–41.
Harrison, J., & Growe, A. (2014b). When regions collide: In what sense a new ‘regional problem’? Environment and Planning A, 46(10), 2332–2352.
Harrison, J., Fedeli, V., & Feiertag, P. (2020). Imagining the evolving spatiality of metropolitan regions. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 133–152). Berlin: Springer.
Harrison, J., & Hoyler, M. (Eds.). (2015). Megaregions: Globalization’s new urban form?. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hesse, M., & Leick, A. (2013). Growth, innovation, metropolitan regions: Reconstructing the recent modernisation of spatial development guidelines in Germany. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 71(3), 343–359.
IKM [European Metropolitan Region Initiative]. (2003). Strategiepapier – Initiativkreis Europäische Metropolregionen (Strategy paper—European metropolitan region initiative). Berlin: Technische Universität.
IMeG [Metropolitan Border Regions Initiative Group]. (2013). Initiative group of German regions in cross-border functional regions—Final report. Saarbrücken: IMeG.
Kübler, D., & Lefèvre, C. (2018). Megacity governance and the state. Urban Research & Practice, 11(4), 378–395.
Lang, T., & Török, I. (2017). Metropolitan region policies in the European Union: Following national, European or neoliberal agendas? International Planning Studies, 22(1), 1–13.
Lee, N. (2017). Powerhouse of cards? Understanding the ‘Northern Powerhouse’. Regional Studies, 51(3), 478–489.
Magnusson, W. (2011). Politics of urbanism: Seeing like a city. New York: Routledge.
Mayer, M. (2008). To what end do we theorize sociospatial relations? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 414–419.
METREX. (2014). Metropolitan dimension—Position statement. Glasgow: METREX.
RECLUS. (1989). Les Villes Europeénnes: Rapport pour la DATAR. Montpellier: RECLUS.
Regional Plan Association. (2006). America 2050: A prospectus. New York: RPA.
Salet, W., Thornley, A., & Kreukels, A. (Eds.). (2003). Metropolitan governance and spatial planning: Comparative case studies of European City-regions. London: Spon Press.
Scott, A. J. (2001). Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UN-Habitat. (2016a). HABITAT III—New urban agenda (Revised Zero Draft). Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
UN-Habitat. (2016b). HABITAT III—New urban agenda. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
Wachsmuth, D. (2017). Infrastructure alliances: Supply-chain expansion and multi-city growth coalitions. Economic Geography, 93(1), 44–65.
Ward, C., & Swyngedouw, E. (2018). Neoliberation from the ground up: Insurgent capital, regional struggle, and the assetisation of land. Antipode, 50(4), 1077–1097.
Zimmermann, K. (2020). From here to there: Mapping the metropolitan politics of policy mobilities. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feiertag, P., Harrison, J., Fedeli, V. (2020). Constructing Metropolitan Imaginaries: Who Does This and Why? . In: Zimmermann, K., Galland, D., Harrison, J. (eds) Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25631-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25632-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)