Skip to main content

Visual Analytics for Supporting Conflict Resolution in Large Railway Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1012 Accesses

Part of the book series: Proceedings of the International Neural Networks Society ((INNS,volume 1))

Abstract

Train operators are responsible for maintaining and following the schedule of large-scale railway transport systems. Disruptions to this schedule imply conflicts that occur when two trains are bound to use the same railway segment. It is upon the train operator to decide which train must go first to resolve the conflict. As the railway transport system is a large and complex network, the decision may have a high impact on the future schedule, further train delay, costs, and other performance indicators. Due to this complexity and the enormous amount of underlying data, machine learning models have proven to be useful. However, the automated models are not accessible to the train operators which results in a low trust in following their predictions. We propose a Visual Analytics solution for a decision support system to support the train operators in making an informed decision while providing access to the complex machine learning models. Different integrated, interactive views allow the train operator to explore the various impacts that a decision may have. Additionally, the user can compare various data-driven models which are structured by an experience-based model. We demonstrate a decision-making process in a use case highlighting how the different views are made use of by the train operator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arnott, D.: Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach. Inf. Syst. J. 16(1), 55–78 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai, Y., Ho, T.K., Mao, B., Ding, Y., Chen, S.: Energy-efficient locomotive operation for chinese mainline railways by fuzzy predictive control. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15(3), 938–948 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dollevoet, T., Corman, F., D’Ariano, A., Huisman, D.: An iterative optimization framework for delay management and train scheduling. Flex. Serv. Manuf. J. 26(4), 490–515 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dotoli, M., Epicoco, N., Falagario, M., Seatzu, C., Turchiano, B.: A decision support system for optimizing operations at intermodal railroad terminals. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 47(3), 487–501 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghofrani, F., He, Q., Goverde, R.M., Liu, X.: Recent applications of big data analytics in railway transportation systems: a survey. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 90, 226–246 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, I.A., Goverde, R.M., van der Meer, D.J.: Online train delay recognition and running time prediction. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1783–1788 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, G.B., Zhu, Q.Y., Siew, C.K.: Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jentner, W., Sevastjanova, R., Stoffel, F., Keim, D.A., Bernard, J., El-Assady, M.: Minions, sheep, and fruits: metaphorical narratives to explain artificial intelligence and build trust. In: Workshop on Visualization for AI Explainability (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J.D., Görg, C., Kohlhammer, J., Melançon, G.: Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In: Information Visualization, pp. 154–175 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46(1), 50–80 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lulli, A., Oneto, L., Canepa, R., Petralli, S., Anguita, D.: Large-scale railway networks train movements: a dynamic, interpretable, and robust hybrid data analytics system. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nowakowski, T.: Analysis of modern trends of logistics technology development. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 11(3), 699–706 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oneto, L., Fumeo, E., Clerico, G., Canepa, R., Papa, F., Dambra, C., Mazzino, N., Anguita, D.: Advanced analytics for train delay prediction systems by including exogenous weather data. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pp. 458–467 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oneto, L., Fumeo, E., Clerico, G., Canepa, R., Papa, F., Dambra, C., Mazzino, N., Anguita, D.: Train delay prediction systems: a big data analytics perspective. Big Data Res. 11, 54–64 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Restel, F.: The Markov reliability and safety model of the railway transportation system. In: Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: “why should I trust you?”: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135–1144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sacha, D., Stoffel, A., Stoffel, F., Kwon, B.C., Ellis, G.P., Keim, D.A.: Knowledge generation model for visual analytics. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 20(12), 1604–1613 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Welling, S.H., Refsgaard, H.H., Brockhoff, P.B., Clemmensen, L.H.: Forest floor visualizations of random forests. arXiv:1605.09196 (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the European Union through the project IN2DREAMS (European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 777596).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udo Schlegel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schlegel, U. et al. (2020). Visual Analytics for Supporting Conflict Resolution in Large Railway Networks. In: Oneto, L., Navarin, N., Sperduti, A., Anguita, D. (eds) Recent Advances in Big Data and Deep Learning. INNSBDDL 2019. Proceedings of the International Neural Networks Society, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16841-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics