Skip to main content

Foregrounding the Background: Business, Economics, Labor, and Government Policy as Shaping Forces in Early Digital Computing History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring the Early Digital

Part of the book series: History of Computing ((HC))

  • 687 Accesses

Abstract

This paper places the early history of digital computing in the United States, during the period from 1945 to 1960, in the larger historical context of American business, labor, and policy. It considers issues concerning the business sectors that chose to enter into early digital computing, the robustness of the general economy and the importance of defense as an economic driver, the scientific race with the Russians, and gendered issues of technical labor – and how each of these helped to shape the emerging mainframe computer industry.

The decade and a half from the end of the Second World War to the election of John F Kennedy as president in 1960 was one of prosperity and progress for the American economy and its business sector. Although the developing Cold War with the Soviet Union overshadowed many of the developments of that period, its effect was stimulative for the domestic economy. Pent-up consumer demand from the Second World War years, the availability of cheap energy, the application of government-financed wartime innovations to peacetime commercial uses, and liberal programs of foreign economic and military aid all encouraged private investment and created expanding employment opportunities. Increased productivity and the application of new tools for monetary and fiscal management helped keep the economy growing and minimized the potential for inflation and excessive swings of the business cycle. Despite the increased role of government intervention in the economy, American business enjoyed an era of market-directed growth that created an affluent society without parallel in the world (Johnson, “American Business in the Postwar Era,” pp. 101–113 in Bremner and Reichard, op cit, 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Not very far into the writing of this paper, the authors discovered Thomas Haigh’s excellent but infrequently cited paper, “Computing the American Way” (2010). His paper has a purpose similar to this one, and we commend our readers to examine his paper carefully. We have intentionally refocused our paper to take a different tack from the one Haigh takes, but nevertheless there are a few places at which the two papers overlap.

  2. 2.

    Some examples of excellent contextualized computer histories include Campbell-Kelly (1990) on ICL and the British computer industry, Lecuyer (2005) on Silicon Valley , Bassett (2007) on semiconductor history, Edwards (1997) and Akera (2008) on Cold War computing, Heide (2009) on punched -card systems, Rubin and Huber (1986) on the knowledge industry in the United States, and Haigh and Paju (2016) on IBM in Europe. There are many more good examples of literature that could be pointed to here. However, the goal of this paper is to present a brief and readable account without trying to do justice to a full bibliographic analysis. This paper can thus be regarded as more of an essay than a traditional research literature review.

  3. 3.

    The focus of this paper is early computer history. Some audiences would be more interested in the history of information rather than the history of computing, and this topic is also shaped by similar exogenous forces. One approach to this broader topic in the United States is taken by Rubin and Huber (1986), who describe the knowledge industry as including education, research and development, the media of communication, information machines, and information services. A more recent approach to the history of information in the United States is given by Cortada (2016), which traces the use of information in government, business, education, and people’s everyday lives since 1870.

  4. 4.

    There are typically some aberrations in these composite profiles, and the prosopographer simply has to live with these aberrations. For example, NCR, which had built codebreaking equipment during the war, had already learned about electronics and computing when the mainframe computing industry was established. IBM handled its lack of electronics expertise in part by stepping out of its role as a business machine manufacturer after the war and also becoming a defense contractor, utilizing government defense contracts to build up its research labs, research personnel, and electronics expertise. So, in this one respect of familiarity with electronics, NCR and IBM were uncharacteristic of the typical business machines company, which generally had little such expertise. But in many other respects, both IBM and NCR were similar to the other business machine manufacturers.

  5. 5.

    There had been excess profit taxes imposed by the federal government during the war. These were revoked in 1945 but reimposed in 1950 because of the Korean War . For an analysis of corporate tax incentives in the 1950s in the United States, see Thorndike (2011). The authors have not been able to find specific cases in which companies entering the computer industry after the Second World War were given tax incentives, but they may exist. IBM , for example, capped its profits at 1.5% on government business during the war and had no postwar revenue slump for which it might have taken advantage of tax credits. In fact, the company grew rapidly in the postwar years. Clearly, defense contracts to certain of these companies were more important than tax incentives in the postwar era.

References

  • Abbate, Janet. 2012. Recoding Gender: Women’s Changing Participation in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Akera, Atsushi. 2008. Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers, and Computers During the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, Toby A. 2000. Shaping Biology: The National Science Foundation and American Biological Research, 1945-1975. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspray, William. 2016. Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Computing: A Historical and Social Study. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aspray, William and Williams, Bernard O. 1994. “Arming American Scientists: NSF and the Provision of Scientific Computing Facilities for Universities, 1950-1973,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspray, William and Williams, Bernard O. 1993. “Computing in Science and Engineering Education: The Programs of the National Science Foundation,” Electro/93 International, vol. 2 (Communications Technology & General Interest), IEEE and ERA, Conference Record, Edison, NJ, April 27-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspray, William, Williams, Bernard O., and Goldstein, Andrew. 1996. “The Social and Intellectual Shaping of a New Mathematical Discipline: The Role of the National Science Foundation in the Rise of Theoretical Computer Science and Engineering.” In Ronald Calinger, ed. Vita Mathematica: Historical Research and Integration with Teaching. Mathematical Association of America Notes Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, John. 1982. “American Workers, the Labor Movement, and the Cold War, 1945-1960, pp. 115–145 in Bremner and Reichard, op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, Ross. 2007. To the Digital Age: Research Labs, Start-up Companies, and the Rise of MOS Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bix, Amy Sue. 2013. Girls Coming to Tech: A History of American Engineering Education for Women. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, Robert H. and Reichard, Gary W. eds. 1982. Reshaping America: Society and Institutions, 1945-1960. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1982.Campbell-Kelly, Martin. 1990. ICL: A Business and Technical History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayton, Mary Kupiec et al., eds. 1993. “The Postwar Period Through the 1950s.” Encyclopedia of American Social History. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceruzzi, Paul. 1989. Beyond the Limits: Flight Enters the Computer Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ceruzzi, Paul. 2003a. A History of Modern Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clowse, B.B. 1981. Brainpower for the Cold War: The Sputnik Crisis and National Defense Education Act of 1958. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, James W. 1993. The Computer in the United States: From Laboratory to Market, 1930 to 1960. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, James W. 2003. The Digital Hand: How Computers Changed the Work of American Manufacturing, Transportation, and Retail Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, James W. 2005. The Digital Hand: Volume II: How Computers Changes the Work of American Financial, Telecommunications, Media, and Entertainment Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, James W. 2007. The Digital Hand: Volume III: How Computers Changed the Work of American Public Sector Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, James W. 2016. All the Facts: A History of Information in the United States Since 1870. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ceruzzi, Paul E. 2003b. A History of Modern Computing. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, J. Merton. 1963. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation’s Formative Years, 1945-1957. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul. 1997. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensmenger, Nathan L. 2012. The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Emmett. 1989. From Rolling Stones to Cornerstones: Anchoring Land-Grant Education in the Counties through the Smith-Lever Act of 1914, Rural Sociologist 9(4): 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamm, Kenneth. 1988. Creating the Computer: Government, Industry, and High Technology. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, Louis. 1970. “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History,” The Business History Review Vol. 44, No. 3 (Autumn), pp. 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Daniel. 2001. Science, Money, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, Thomas. 2010a. “Computing the American Way: Contextualizing the Early U.S. Computer Industry,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 8–20.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, Thomas. 2010b. “Masculinity and the Machine Man: Gender in the History of Data Processing,” in Gender Codes: Why Women are Leaving Computing ed. Thomas J. Misa, IEEE Computer Society Press: 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, Thomas and Petri Paju. 2016. “IBM Rebuilds Europe: The Curious Case of the Transnational Typewriter,” Enterprise & Society 17:2 (June): pp. 265–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, Thomas, Mark Priestley, and Crispin Rope. 2016. ENIAC in Action: Making and Remaking the Modern Computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D.M. 2010. Forged Consensus: Science, Technology, and Economic policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E.P. 1970. Adventures in Research – A History of Ames Research Center, 1940–1965. Washington, DC: NASA, available at https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19700032163.

  • Heide, Lars. 2009. Punched-card Systems and the Early Information Explosion, 1880-1945. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, Harold. 1986. American Singularity. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Arthur M. 1982. “American Business in the Postwar Era,” pp. 101–113 in Bremner and Reichard, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Kenneth M. 1986. “The Government-Science Complex,” pp. 315–348 In Bremner and Reichard, op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph J. Thorndike, “Tax History: The Fifties: From Peace to War”, March 31, 2011, Tax History Project, http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/readings.nsf/ArtWeb/5096E87F9B0111E6852578A8003CF49E?OpenDocument.

  • Keats-Rohan, K.S.B., ed. 2007. Prosopography Approaches and Applications: A Handbook. Oxford: University of Oxford Linacre College Unit for Prosopographical Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel. 1977. “The National Science Foundation and the Debate Over Postwar Research Policy, 1942-1945: A Political Interpretation of Science – The Endless Frontier,” Isis, vol. 68 (March 1977): pp. 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Dan. 1994. “Layers of Interest, Layers of Influence: Business and the Genesis of the National Science Foundation,” Science, Technology, and Human Values, vol. 19: pp. 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Dan. 1995. Politics of the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecuyer, Christophe. 2005. Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lomask, Milton. 1976. A Minor Miracle: An Informal History of the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, R.F. 1979. “The Politics of World War II Science: Senator Harley M. Kilgore and the Legislative Origins of the National Science Foundation,” West Virginia History, vol. 41 (1): pp. 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Campbell-Kelly, William Aspray, Nathan Ensmenger, Jeffrey Yost. Computer: A History of the Information Machine. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazuzan, George. 1988. The National Science Foundation: A Brief History. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misa, Thomas, ed. 2010. Gender Codes: Why Women are Leaving Computing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misa, Thomas. Forthcoming. “Gender Bias in Computing,” in William Aspray, Historical Studies in Computing, Information, and Society: The Flatiron Lectures. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounier-Kuhn, Pierre. 1999. L’informatique en France de la Seconde Guerre mondiale au Plan Calcul. Science, Industrie, Politique Gouvernementale (Paris: CNAM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Homer A., Tobin L. Smith, and Jennifer B. McCormick. 2008. Beyond Sputnik: U.S. science policy in the twenty-first century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, Arthur L. 2005. Computers and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglin, M.D. 1989. A Legislative History of the Communications Act of 1934. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puaca, Laura Michelatti. 2014. Searching for Scientific Womanpower. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, Emerson W. 1995. Building IBM: Shaping an Industry and its Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, Nathan. 1987. “Vannevar Bush’s New Deal for Research: Or the Triumph of the Old Order,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, vol. 17(2): pp. 299–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Henry. 1962. A Critical Look at the Hatch Act, Harvard Law Review 75(3): 510–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, Margaret. 1995. Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940-1972. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Michael Rogers and Mary Taylor Huber, 1986. The Knowledge Industry in the United States, 1960-1980. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulyan, Susan. 1996. Selling Radio: The Commercialization of American Broadcasting 1920-1934. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Nancy B. 1981. From ENIAC to UNIVAC. Bedford, Mass: Digital Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usselman, Steve. 1993. “IBM and Its Imitators: Organizational Capabilities and the Emergence of the International Computer Industry” Business and Economic History Vol. 22, No. 2 (Fall): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usselman, Steve. 1996. “Fostering a Capacity for Compromise: Business, Government, and the Stages of Innovation in American Computing,” Annals of the History of Computing Vol. 18, No. 2 (Summer 1996): 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, William F. undated. Shifting Attitudes: Women in Computing, 1965-1985. https://www.sigcis.org/files/Vogel.pdf (accessed 5 June 2018).

  • Wang, J. 1995. “Liberals, the Progressive Left, and the Political Economy of Postwar American Science: The National Science Foundation Debate Revisited,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, vol. 26: pp. 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, JoAnne. 2008. Structuring the Information Age: Life Insurance and Technology in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Aspray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aspray, W., Loughnane, C. (2019). Foregrounding the Background: Business, Economics, Labor, and Government Policy as Shaping Forces in Early Digital Computing History. In: Haigh, T. (eds) Exploring the Early Digital. History of Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02152-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02152-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02151-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02152-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics