Skip to main content

Bringing Design Science Research to Service Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Exploring Service Science (IESS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 331))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Service design is a multidisciplinary field dedicated to create new and innovative services. To accomplish this goal, service design resorts to contributions from other disciplines such as service management, marketing, information systems and interaction design. However, service design lacks dedicated methods and models that integrate the contributions from these disciplines. Design science research (DSR) offers a solid methodology to develop such artifacts and is already starting to be used in service research. To show how DSR can support service design, this article presents two new service design methods that have been developed using DSR and examines the process followed for developing them. Building on these methods, the article discusses how DSR can leverage service design characteristics of multidisciplinarity, human-centeredness and creativity, to develop further knowledge contributions for service design. Finally, the challenges posed by using DSR in service design and service research are also discussed, as well as ways to address those challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yu, E., Sangiorgi, D.: Service design as an approach to implement the value cocreation perspective in new service development. J. Serv. Res. 21, 40–58 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holmlid, S., Evenson, S.: Bringing service design to service sciences, management and engineering. In: Hefley, B., Murphy, W. (eds.) Service Science, Management and Engineering Education for the 21st Century. SSRI, pp. 341–345. Springer, Berlin (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76578-5_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, E., Sangiorgi, D.: Service design as an approach to new service development: reflections and futures studies. In: ServDes. 2014. Fourth Service Design and Innovation Conference “Service Futures”, pp. 194–204. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patrício, L., Gustafsson, A., Fisk, R.: Upframing service design and innovation for research impact. J. Serv. Res. 21, 3–16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ostrom, A.L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D.E., Patrício, L., Voss, C.A.: Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. J. Serv. Res. 18, 127–159 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15, 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 470 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: The emergence of design research in information systems in North America. J. Des. Res. 7, 1–16 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hevner, A.: The three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beloglazov, A., Banerjee, D., Hartman, A., Buyya, R.: Improving productivity in design and development of information technology (IT) service delivery simulation models. J. Serv. Res. (JSR) 18, 75–89 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Teixeira, J.G., Patrício, L., Huang, K.-H., Fisk, R.P., Nóbrega, L., Constantine, L.: The MINDS method: integrating management and interaction design perspectives for service design. J. Serv. Res. 20, 240–258 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chartterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patrício, L., Pinho, N., Teixeira, J.G., Fisk, R.P.: Service design for value networks: enabling value cocreation interactions in health care. Serv. Sci. 10, 76–97 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patrício, L., Fisk, R.P., Cunha, J.F.E., Constantine, L.: Multilevel service design: from customer value constellation to service experience blueprint. J. Serv. Res. 14, 180–200 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Truong, K.N., Hayes, G.R., Abowd, G.D.: Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 12–21. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ostrom, A.L., et al.: Moving forward and making a difference: research priorities for the science of service. J. Serv. Res. 13, 4–36 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., Evenson, S.: Crafting a place for interaction design research in HCI. Des. Issues 24, 19–29 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Morelli, N., Tollestrup, C.: New representation techniques for designing in a systemic perspective. In: Nordic Design Research Conference, Stockholm, Sweden (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.L.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Gregory, R.W., Muntermann, J.: Research note—heuristic theorizing: proactively generating design theories. Inf. Syst. Res. 25, 639–653 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8, 5–21 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35, 37–56 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Blomkvist, J., Holmlid, S., Segelström, F.: Service design research: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In: Stickdorn, M., Schneider, J. (eds.) This is Service Design Thinking, pp. 308–315. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J.: Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Des. Stud. 16, 261–274 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des. Issues 17, 49–55 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schon, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J. Manag. Stud. 41, 219–246 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Tuunanen, T., Vaezi, R.: Design science research evaluation. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 398–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Grenha Teixeira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Teixeira, J.G., Patrício, L., Tuunanen, T. (2018). Bringing Design Science Research to Service Design. In: Satzger, G., Patrício, L., Zaki, M., Kühl, N., Hottum, P. (eds) Exploring Service Science. IESS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00712-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00713-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics