Skip to main content

Towards Sustainable Operations Management Integrating Sustainability Management into Operations Management Strategies and Practices

  • Chapter

Abstract

Sustainability is an increasingly relevant issue for a wide range of organizations, and therefore sustainability management strategies and practices are of growing significance. Because many sustainability impacts are strongly influenced by operations management decisions it is critical that the operations management function embraces the requirements of sustainability management. This has implications for decisions and processes associated with all aspects of operations management including strategy, design, planning and control, and improvement. For example, appropriate environmental and social performance objectives, targets and indicators need to be integrated with quality, cost and other more conventional performance measures. The closed loop supply chain perspective must be adopted and the requirements of other stakeholders in addition to the customer must drive operations decisions. The scope of any given “operation” is thereby expanded considerably and the nature of the operations management role altered, with implications both for the professional development of managers and the research needed to support the manager in this changed role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schultz K, Williamson P. Gaining competitive advantage in a carbon-constrained world: strategies for European business. European Management Journal 2005; 23(4):383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Inman RA. Implications of environmental management for operations management. Production Planning and Control 2002; 13(1):47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Porter ME, van der Linde C. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 1995;Sep–Oct 1995:120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soyka PA, Feldman SJ. Capturing the business value of EH&S excellence. Corporate Environmental Strategy 1998; 5(2): 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkins H. Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 2006; 67:241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Orsato RJ. Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green? California Management Review 2006; 48(2): 127.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll AB. Managing ethically with global stakeholders: a present and future challenge. Academy of Management Executive 2004; 18(2):114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson HH. Does it pay to be good? Social responsibility and financial performance. Business Horizons 2003; Nov–Dec 2003:34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Payne DM, Raiborn CA. Sustainable development: the ethics support the economics. Journal of Business Ethics 2001; 32:157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R. Operations management. 4th ed. FT Prentice Hall, New York, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our common future, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson A, Hill MR, Gollan P. The sustainability debate. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 2001; 21(12):1492–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carroll AB. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 1991; July–August: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kok P, et al., A corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework. Journal of Business Ethics 2001; 31:285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Castka P, et al., Integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into ISO management systems — In search of a feasible CSR management system framework. The TQM Magazine 2004; 16(3):216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elkington J. The “triple bottom line” for 21st century business. In: Starkey R, Welford R, editors. The Earthscan reader in business and sustainable development. Earthscan, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dow Jones Indexes. Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. British Telecommunications Plc (BT), Changing world: sustained values. BT, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  19. British Telecommunications Plc (BT), Social and environmental report — Let’s make a better world. BT, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. British Telecommunications Plc (BT), BT: Society and environment. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. BSI, BS 8900: 2006 Guidance for management of sustainable development, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gibson RB. Beyond the pillars: Sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 2006;8(3):259–280.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. SA 8000, Social Accountability International: New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Webb K. The ISO 26000 social responsibility guidance standard-progress so far. ESG UQAM 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Global reporting initiative, sustainability reporting guidelines, version 3.0. Global Reporting Initiative. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. James P. Towards sustainable business? In: Charter M, Tischner U, editors. Sustainable solutions — Developing products and services for the future. Greanleaf: Sheffield, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Veleva V, Ellenbecker M. A proposal for measuring business sustainability. Greener Management International 2000; Autumn:101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lamberton G. Sustainability accounting — A brief history and conceptual framework. Accounting Forum 2005; 29:7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. BSI, BS EN ISO 14040: 2006 Environmental management — life cycle assessment — Principles and framework, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Byung-Chul C, et al., Life cycle assessment of a personal computer and its effective recycling rate. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2006; 11(2):122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Seuring S. Emerging issues in life-cycle management. Greener Management International 2004; 45:Spring: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Westkamper E, Alting L, Arndt G. Life cycle management and assessment: approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers Pt B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2001; 215:599–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Post JE, Preston LE, Sachs S. Managing the extended enterprise: the new stakeholder view. California Management Review 2002; 45(1):6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Payne A, Ballantyne D, Christopher M. A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing 2006; 39(7/8):855–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Laszlo C, Sherman D, Whalen J. Expanding the value horizon: how stakeholder value contributes to competitive advantage. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 2005; winter: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Freeman E, Liedtka JM. Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal 1997; 15(3):286–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. de Man R, Burns TR. Sustainability: supply chains, partner linkages, and new forms of self-regulation. Human Systems Management 2006;5:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Geyer R, Jackson T. Supply loops and their constraints: the industrial ecology of recycling and reuse. California Management Review 2004; 46(2):55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guide VDR, Harrison TP, Van Wassenhove LN. The challenge of closed-loop supply chains. Interfaces 2003; 33(6):3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. van Hoek RI. Case studies of greening the automotive supply chain through technology and operations. International journal of environmental technology and management 2001; 1(1/2):140–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Krikke H, Blanc Ile, van de Velde S. Product Modularity and the design of closed-loop supply chains. California Management Review 2004; 46(2): 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Guide VDR, Van Wassenhove L. Business aspects of closed-loop supply chains — Exploring the issues. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Bosch Institute, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rhodes E. From supply chains to total product systems. In: Rhodes E, Warren JP, Carter R, editors. Supply chains and total product systems: A reader. The Open University and Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Garcia Sanchez I, Wenzel H, Jorgenson MS. Models for defining LCM, monitoring LCM practice and assessing its feasibility. Greener Management International 2004; 45:Spring: 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Desrochers P. Regional development and interindustry recycling linkages: Some historical perspectives. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 2002; 14:49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gupta M, Sharma K. Environmental operations management: an opportunity for improvement. Production and Inventory Management Journal 1996; Third Quarter: 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP. Environmental principles applicable to supply chain design and operation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006; 14:1593–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gupta MC. Environmental management and its impact on the operations function. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 1995; 15(8):34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Elliott B. Operations management: A key player in achieving a sustainable future. Management services 2001; July 2001:14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Van Wassenhove LN. Sustainable Operations Management. Production and Operations Management 2005; 14(4): 482–492.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schmidt I, et al., SEEbalance: Managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco efficency analysis by BASF. Greener Management International 2004; 45:Spring: 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sroufe RP, et al., Environmental management practices — A framework. Greener Management International 2002; 40:Winter: 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lowson RH. Operations Strategy: Genealogy, classification and anatomy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 2002; 22(10):1112–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hayes RH, Upton DM. Operations-based strategy. California Management Review 1998; 40(4):8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gagnon S. Resource-based competition and the new operations strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 1999; 19(2):125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Guide VDR, Teunter RH, Van Wassenhove LN. Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 2003; 5(4):303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mont O. Reducing life-cycle environmental impacts through systems of joint use. Greener Management International 2004; 45:Spring: 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Halme M, Jasch C, Scharp M. Sustainable homeservices? Towards household services that enhance ecological, social and economic sustainability. Ecological Economics 2004; 51:125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Stahel WR. Sustainability and services. In: Charter M, Tischner U, editors. Sustainable solutions — Developing products and services for the future. Greanleaf: Sheffield 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Roy R. Sustainable product-service systems. Futures 2000;32:289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Reiskin ED, White AL. Servicizing the chemical supply chain. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2000; 3(2 and 3):19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Oliva R, Kallenburg R. Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management 2003; 14(2):160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Corbett CJ, Klassen RD. Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 2006; 8(1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Klassen, RD, Angell LC. An international comparison of environmental management in operations: The impact of manufacturing flexibility in the US and Germany. Journal of Operations Management 1998; 16: 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kaplan S, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard — Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 1992; Jan.–Feb: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hervani AA, Helms MM, Sarkis J. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal 2005;12(4): 330–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Neely A, Adams C, Crowe P. The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence 2001;5(2): 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. BSI, BS EN ISO 14031:2000 Environmental management — Environmental performance evaluation — Guidelines, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Angell LC, Klassen RD. Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management 1999; 17:575–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hill MR. Sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions and international operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 2001; 21(12):1503–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. ENDS, Firms link up to monitor suppliers’ CSR risks. ENDS Report, 2006; 379: 23.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Rothenberg S, Pil FK, Maxwell D. Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmental performance. Production and operations management 2001; 10(3): 228–243.

    Google Scholar 

  73. BSI, BS EN ISO 9001:2000 Quality management systems — Requirements, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  74. BSI, BS 8800:2004 Occupational health and safety management systems — Guide, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  75. BSI, BS EN ISO 14001:2004 Environmental Management Systems — Requirements with guidance for use, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  76. DEFRA, The pinnacle of environmental management-an introductory guide to EMAS. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Karapetrovic S, Willborn W. Integration of quality and environmental management systems. The TQM Magazine 1998; 10(3): 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wilkinson G, Dale BG. Integration of quality, environmental and health and safety management systems: an examination of the key issues. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers Pt B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 1999; 213:275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Beer M. Why total quality management programs do not persist: The role of management quality and implications for leading a TQM transformation. Decision Sciences 2003; 34(4):623–641.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  80. Hill S, Wilkinson A. In search of TQM. Employee Relations 1995; 17(3):8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. McElhaney KA, Toffel MW, Hill N. Designing a sustainability management system at BMW Group — The Designworks/USA case study. Greener Management International 2004; 46(summer):103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Levitt T. Marketing success through differentiation-of anything. Harvard Business Review, 1980(Jan/Feb): 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Payne A, Holt S, Frow P. Relationship value management: exploring the integration of employee, customer and shareholder value and enterprise performance models. Journal of Marketing Management 2001; 17:785–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Payne A, Holt S. Diagnosing customer value: integrating the value process and relationship marketing. British Journal of Management 2001; 12:159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Gronroos C. Service management and marketing — A customer relationship management approach. Wiley, New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Maxwell D, Sheate W, van der Vorst R. Functional and systems aspects of the sustainable product and service development approach for industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006; 14:1466–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Karlsson R, Luttropp C. Ecodesign: What’s happening? An overview of the subject area of ecodesign and of the papers in this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006;14:1291–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Bhamra TA. Ecodesign: the search for new strategies in product development. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers Pt B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2004; 218: 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Charter M, Tischner U. Sustainable solutions — Ddeveloping products and services for the future. Greanleaf, Sheffield, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Tischner U, Charter M. Sustainable product design. In: Charter M, Tischner U, editors. Sustainable solutions — Developing products and services for the future. Greanleaf: Sheffield. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Leiper QJ, Riley P, Uren S. The environmental challenge for supply chain management. In: Rhodes E, Warren JP, Carter R, editors. Supply chains and total product systems: A reader. The Open University and Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Winstanley D, Clark J, Leeson H. Approaches to child labour in the supply chain. In: Rhodes E, Warren JP, Carter R, editors. Supply chains and total product systems: A reader. The Open University and Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  93. Seuring S. Integrated chain management and supply chain management comparative analysis and illustrative cases. Journal of Cleaner Production 2004; 12: 1059–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Khan FI, Sadiq R, Veitch B. Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production 2004; 12:58–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Tischner U. Tools for ecodesign and sustainable product design. In: Charter M, Tischner U, editors. Sustainable solutions-Developing products and services for the future. Greanleaf: Sheffield, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Byggeth SH, Handling E. Trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006; 14:1420–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Thierry M, et al., Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review 1995; 37(2):114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  98. King AM, Burgess SC. The development of a remanufacturing platform design: A strategic response to the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers Pt B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2005; 219:623–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Toffel MW. The growing strategic importance of end-of-life product management. California Management Review 2003; 45(3): 102–129.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Johnson G, Scholes K. Exploring corporate strategy. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Cumming JF. Engaging stakeholders in corporate accountability programmes: A cross-sectoral analysis of UK and transnational experience. Business Ethics: A European Review 200110(1):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Accountability, AA1000SES Stakeholder engagement standard — Exposure draft.: London, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Thiry M. A framework for value management practice. Project Management Institute 1997

    Google Scholar 

  104. Gale R. Environmental management accounting as a reflexive modernization strategy in cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006; 14: 1228–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Gale R. Environmental costs at a Canadian paper mill: A case study of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006;14: 1237–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Jasch C. How to perform an environmental management cost assessment in one day. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006; 14: 1194–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Atkinson G. Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2000; 43(2):235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Reinert KH, Jaycock MA, Weiler ED. Using risk assessment to facilitate and enhance the movement to sustainability. Environmental Quality Management 2006; Spring:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Turnbull N. Internal Control, guidance for directors on the combined code. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Gilbert M, Gould R. Achieving environmental standards. 2nd ed. FT Pitman, London, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Volvo Car Corporation, Sustainability Report, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Melnyk SA, et al., Green MRP: identifying the material and environmental impacts of production schedules. International Journal of Production Research 2001; 39(8):1559–1573.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  113. J Sainsbury plc, Corporate Responsibility Report, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Zwetsloot GIJM. From management systems to corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 2003; 44:201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Slack N. The importance-performance matrix as a determinant of improvement priority. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 1994; 14(5):59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Oakland J. Chapter 13 Implementation of TQM and the management of change, in TQM Text with cases. Butterworth Heinemann, London, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Ammenberg J, Hjelm O. The connection between environmental management systems and continual performance improvement. Corporate Environmental Strategy 2002; 9(2):183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Azzone G, Noci G., Identifying effective PMSs for the deployment of “green” manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 1998; 18(4):308–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. de Burgos Jimenez J, Lorente JJC. Environmental performance as an operations objective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 2001; 21(12):1553–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Epstein MJ, Roy M-J. Improving sustainability performance: specifying, implementing and measuring key principles. Journal of General Management 2003; 29(1):15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Marks and Spencer, Corporate Social Responsibility Report, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Voss CA. Operations Management — From Taylor to Toyota — and beyond? British Journal of Management 1995; 6 (Special Issue): S17–S29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Gloet M. Knowledge management and the links to HRM: developing leadership and management capabilities to support sustainability. Management Research News 2006; 29(7): 402–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bettley, A., Burnley, S. (2008). Towards Sustainable Operations Management Integrating Sustainability Management into Operations Management Strategies and Practices. In: Misra, K.B. (eds) Handbook of Performability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-130-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-131-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics