Skip to main content

Methods for Chromatographic Removal of Endotoxin

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 899))

Abstract

Endotoxin removal is critical when producing therapeutic proteins in bacterial systems. This hydrophobic compound can be removed through chromatography or filtration, but presents unique challenges dependent upon protein composition as well as production scale. Here we present a robust method for endotoxin removal at the pilot production scale using fast protein liquid chromatography and buffers specifically engineered for endotoxin removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Bone RC (1991) The pathogenesis of sepsis. Ann Intern Med 115:457–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Glauser MP, Zanetti G, Baumgartner JD, Cohen J (1991) Septic shock: pathogenesis. Lancet 338:732–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Venet C, Zeni F, Viallon A, Ross A, Pain P, Gery P, Page D, Vermesch R, Bertrand M, Rancon F, Bertrand JC (2000) Endotoxaemia in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Intensive Care Med 26:538–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrison DC, Ulevitch RJ (1978) The effects of bacterial endotoxins on host mediation systems. A review. Am J Pathol 93:526–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kotani S, Takada H, Tsujimoto M, Ogawa T, Takahashi I, Ikeda T, Otsuka K, Shimauchi H, Kasai N, Mashimo J et al (1985) Synthetic lipid A with endotoxic and related biological activities comparable to those of a natural lipid A from an Escherichia coli re-mutant. Infect Immun 49:225–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hack CE, Aarden LA, Thijs LG (1997) Role of cytokines in sepsis. Adv Immunol 66:101–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lukacs NW, Hogaboam C, Campbell E, Kunkel SL (1999) Chemokines: function, regulation and alteration of inflammatory responses. Chem Immunol 72:102–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. United States Pharmacopeia—National Formulary (2010) Vol. USP 34-NF29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jang H, Kim HS, Moon SC, Lee YR, Yu KY, Lee BK, Youn HZ, Jeong YJ, Kim BS, Lee SH, Kim JS (2009) Effects of protein concentration and detergent on endotoxin reduction by ultrafiltration. BMB Rep 42:462–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamamoto C, Kim ST (1996) Endotoxin rejection by ultrafiltration through high-flux, hollow fiber filters. J Biomed Mater Res 32:467–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen RH, Huang C Jr, Newton BS, Ritter G, Old LJ, Batt CA (2009) Factors affecting endotoxin removal from recombinant therapeutic proteins by anion exchange chromatography. Protein Expr Purif 64:76–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunioka M, Choi HJ (1995) Properties of biodegradable hydrogels prepared by gamma-irradiation of microbial poly(epsilon-lysine) aqueous-solutions. J Appl Polym Sci 58:801–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morimoto S, Sakata M, Iwata T, Esaki A, Hirayama C (1995) Preparations and applications of polyethyleneimine-immobilized cellulose fibers for endotoxin removal. Polym J 27:831–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe AJ, Anderson KA, Bardliving CL, Huang C Jr, Teixeira LM, Damasceno LM, Ritter G, Old LJ, Batt CA (2011) Expression and purification of cGMP grade NY-ESO-1 for clinical trials. Biotechnol Prog 27(2):435–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumae H, Minobe S, Kindan K, Watanabe T, Sato T, Tosa T (1990) Specific removal of endotoxin from protein solutions by immobilized histidine. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 12:129–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu CL, Nikas YJ, Blankschtein D (1996) Novel bioseparations using two-phase aqueous micellar systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 52:185–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nikas Y, Liu CL, Abbott N, Blankschtein D (1992) Experimental and theoretical investigations of protein partitioning in 2-phase aqueous micellar systems. Abstr Pap Am Chem Soc 203:140-IEC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anspach FB, Spille H, Rinas U (1995) Purification of recombinant human basic ­fibroblast growth factor: stability of selective sorbents under cleaning in place conditions. J Chromatogr A 711:129–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karplus TE, Ulevitch RJ, Wilson CB (1987) A new method for reduction of endotoxin contamination from protein solutions. J Immunol Methods 105:211–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Damais C, Jupin C, Parant M, Chedid L (1987) Induction of human interleukin-1 production by polymyxin B. J Immunol Methods 101:51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen RH (2009) Increasing inclusion body extractability and recoverability by altering fermentation conditions in high cell density Escherichia coli cultures. In: Chemical engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burgess RR (2009) Refolding solubilized inclusion body proteins. Methods Enzymol 463:259–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. de Marco A (2011) Molecular and chemical chaperones for improving the yields of soluble recombinant proteins. Methods Mol Biol 705:31–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eiberle MK, Jungbauer A (2010) Technical refolding of proteins: do we have freedom to operate? Biotechnol J 5:547–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam J. Lowe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lowe, A.J., Bardliving, C.L., Batt, C.A. (2012). Methods for Chromatographic Removal of Endotoxin. In: Voynov, V., Caravella, J. (eds) Therapeutic Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 899. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-920-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-921-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics