Skip to main content

Qualitative Versus Quantitative Methods in Psychiatric Research

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 829))

Abstract

Qualitative studies are gaining their credibility after a period of being misinterpreted as “not being quantitative.” Qualitative method is a broad umbrella term for research methodologies that describe and explain individuals’ experiences, behaviors, interactions, and social contexts. In-depth interview, focus groups, and participant observation are among the qualitative methods of inquiry commonly used in psychiatry. Researchers measure the frequency of occurring events using quantitative methods; however, qualitative methods provide a broader understanding and a more thorough reasoning behind the event. Hence, it is considered to be of special importance in psychiatry. Besides hypothesis generation in earlier phases of the research, qualitative methods can be employed in questionnaire design, diagnostic criteria establishment, feasibility studies, as well as studies of attitude and beliefs. Animal models are another area that qualitative methods can be employed, especially when naturalistic observation of animal behavior is important. However, since qualitative results can be researcher’s own view, they need to be statistically confirmed, quantitative methods. The tendency to combine both qualitative and quantitative methods as complementary methods has emerged over recent years. By applying both methods of research, scientists can take advantage of interpretative characteristics of qualitative methods as well as experimental dimensions of quantitative methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Greenhalgh, T., and Taylor, R. (1997) How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research), BMJ 315, 740–743.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McKibbon, K. A., and Gadd, C. S. (2004) A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 4, 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ioannidis, J. P. (2005) Why most published research findings are false, PLoS Med 2, e124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sterne, J. A., and Davey Smith, G. (2001) Sifting the evidence-what’s wrong with significance tests?, BMJ 322, 226–231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Delahaye, F., Landrivon, G., Ecochard, R., and Colin, C. (1991) Meta-analysis, Health Policy 19, 185–196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cragg, G., Boyd, M., Cardellina II, J., Grever, M., Schepartz, S., Snader, K., and Suffness, M. (1993) The search for new pharmaceutical crops: Drug discovery and development at the National Cancer Institute, in New crops (Janick, J., and Simon, J., Eds.), p 7, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farnsworth, N. R. (1988) Screening plants for new medicines, in Biodiversity (Wilson, E. O., Ed.), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shank, G. (2002) Qualitative Research. A Personal Skills Approach, Merill Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (2000) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patton, M. Q., (Ed.) (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoepfl, M. C. (1997) Choosing Qualitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education Researchers, Journal of Technology Education 9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Golafshani, N. (2003) Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, The Qualitative Report 8, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., and Davidson, L. (2002) Understanding and evaluating qualitative research, Aust N Z J Psychiatry 36, 717–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967) Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Glaser, B. G. (2000) The discovery of grounded theory, Sociology Press Mill Valley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glaser, B. G. (2002) Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Buston, K., Parry-Jones, W., Livingston, M., Bogan, A., and Wood, S. (1998) Qualitative research, Br J Psychiatry 172, 197–199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Glesne, C., and Peshkin, A. (1992) Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction, Longman, White Plains, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patton, M. Q. (1999) Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis, Health Serv Res 34, 1189–1208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spradley, J. P. (1979) The ethnographic interview, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Creswell, J. W., and Tashakkori, A. (2007) Editorial: Developing Publishable Mixed Methods Manuscripts, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Whitley, R., and Crawford, M. (2005) Qualitative research in psychiatry, Can J Psychiatry 50, 108–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mays, N., and Pope, C. (1995) Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research, BMJ 311, 109–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitzinger, J. (1995) Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups, BMJ 311, 299–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown, C., and Lloyd, K. (2001) Qualitative methods in psychiatric research, Adv Psychiatr Treat 7, 350–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raza, M. (2006) A role for physicians in ethnopharmacology and drug discovery, J Ethnopharmacol 104, 297–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Akerele, O. (1984) WHO’s traditional medicine programme: progress and perspectives, WHO Chron 38, 76–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heinrich, M., Edwards, S., Moerman, D. E., and Leonti, M. (2009) Ethnopharmacological field studies: a critical assessment of their conceptual basis and methods, J Ethnopharmacol 124, 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nelson, D. D. (1985) Informal testing as a means of questionnaire development Journal of Official Statistics 1, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., and Singer, E. (2004) Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questions, Public Opin Q 68, 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Skodol, A. E., and Spitzer, R. L. (1982) The Development of Reliable Diagnostic Criteria in Psychiatry, Annual Review of Medicine 33, 317–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reidy, D. (1994) The Mental Health System as Agent of Stigma, Resources 6, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Davidson, L., Ridgway, P., Kidd, S., Topor, A., and Borg, M. (2008) Using qualitative research to inform mental health policy, Can J Psychiatry 53, 137–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gibson, G., Timlin, A., Curran, S., and Wattis, J. (2004) The scope for qualitative methods in research and clinical trials in dementia, Age Ageing 33, 422–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grover, S. (2004) Why Won’t They Listen to Us?: On Giving Power and Voice to Children Participating in Social Research, Childhood 11, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bassett, R. (2010) Time to catch up…Qualitative research in child and adolescent psychiatry, J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19, 2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiltshire, S., Bancroft, A., Amos, A., and Parry, O. (2001) “They’re doing people a service”-qualitative study of smoking, smuggling, and social deprivation, BMJ 323, 203–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rutter, D. (2006) Qualitative methods in psychiatry in Research Methods in Psychiatry (Freeman, C., and Peter, T., Eds.) 3 ed., RC PSYCH Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Snowdon, C., Garcia, J., and Elbourne, D. (1997) Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial, Soc Sci Med 45, 1337–1355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pavlov, I. P. (1927) Conditioned Reflexes, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Maier, S. F., and Seligman, M. E. P. (1976) Learned Helplessness: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 105, 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Overmier, J. B., and Seligman, M. E. (1967) Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding, J Comp Physiol Psychol 63, 28–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Shekhar, A., McCann, U. D., Meaney, M. J., Blanchard, D. C., Davis, M., Frey, K. A., Liberzon, I., Overall, K. L., Shear, M. K., Tecott, L. H., and Winsky, L. (2001) Summary of a National Institute of Mental Health workshop: developing animal models of anxiety disorders, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 157, 327–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Horwitz, D. F. (2000) Diagnosis and treatment of canine separation anxiety and the use of clomipramine hydrochloride (clomicalm), J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 36, 107–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. King, J. N., Simpson, B. S., Overall, K. L., Appleby, D., Pageat, P., Ross, C., Chaurand, J. P., Heath, S., Beata, C., Weiss, A. B., Muller, G., Paris, T., Bataille, B. G., Parker, J., Petit, S., and Wren, J. (2000) Treatment of separation anxiety in dogs with clomipramine: results from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial, Appl Anim Behav Sci 67, 255–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Caldji, C., Diorio, J., and Meaney, M. J. (2000) Variations in maternal care in infancy regulate the development of stress reactivity, Biol Psychiatry 48, 1164–1174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. File, S. E., and Seth, P. (2003) A review of 25 years of the social interaction test, Eur J Pharmacol 463, 35–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Flint, J., and Shifman, S. (2008) Animal models of psychiatric disease, Curr Opin Genet Dev 18, 235–240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pellis, S. M. (2002) Sex differences in play fighting revisited: traditional and nontraditional mechanisms of sexual differentiation in rats, Arch Sex Behav 31, 17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Archer, J. (1973) Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: a review, Anim Behav 21, 205–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Razafsha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Razafsha, M. et al. (2012). Qualitative Versus Quantitative Methods in Psychiatric Research. In: Kobeissy, F. (eds) Psychiatric Disorders. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 829. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-457-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-458-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics