Abstract
Experimental stroke researchers take samples from populations (e.g., certain mouse strains), and make inferences about unknown parameters (e.g., infarct sizes, outcomes). They use statistics to describe their data, and they seek formal ways to decide whether their hypotheses are true (“Compound X is a neuroprotectant”). Unfortunately, experimental stroke research at present lacks statistical rigor in designing and analyzing its results, and this may have negative consequences for its predictiveness. This chapter aims at giving a general introduction into the do’s and don’t’s of statistical analysis in experimental stroke research. In particular, we will discuss how to design an experimental series and calculate necessary sample sizes, how to describe data with graphics and numbers, and how to apply and interpret formal tests for statistical significance. A surprising conclusion will be that there are no formal ways of deciding whether a hypothesis is correct or not and that we should focus instead on biological (or clinical) significance as measured in the size of an effect and on the implications of this effect for the biological system or organism. “Good evidence” that a hypothesized effect is real comes from replication across multiple studies; it cannot be inferred from the result of a single statistical test.
Key words
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bederson JB, Pitts LH, Tsuji M, Nishimura MC, Davis RL, Bartkowski H (1986) Rat middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation of the model and development of a neurologic examination. Stroke 17:472–476
Buchan A, Pulsinelli WA (1990) Hypothermia but not the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, MK-801, attenuates neuronal damage in gerbils subjected to transient global ischemia. J Neurosci 10:311–316
Hunt H (2008) Boxplots in Excel, 15 October 2008, http://www.coventry.ac.uk/ec/∼nhunt/boxplot.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2009
Harlow LL, Mulaik SA, Steiger JH (eds) (1997) What if there were no significance tests? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London
O‘Hagan A, Luce R (2003) A primer on Bayesian statistics in health econonomics and outcomes research. http://www.shef.ac.uk/content/1/c6/02/55/92/primer.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2009
Sterne JAC, Smith GD (2001) Sifting the evidence – what’s wrong with significance tests? Br Med J 322:226–231
Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN (2008) The cult of statistical significance: how the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Univ of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
Kirk RE (1996) Practical significance: a concept whose time has come. Educ Psychol Measur 56:746–759
Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ (2004) Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American physiological society. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287:R247–R249
Dirnagl U (2006) Bench to bedside: the quest for quality in experimental stroke research. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:1465–1478
G*Power 3, 12 December 2008 http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/G*Power3/, Accessed 5 Feb 2009
Schmidt FL, Hunter JE (1997) Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation of significance testing in the analysis of research data. In: Harlow L, Mulaik SA, Steiger JH (eds) What if there were no significance tests? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp 37–64
Mulaik SA, Raju NS, Harshman RA (1997) There is a time and a place for significance testing. In: Harlow L, Mulaik SA, Steiger JH (eds) What if there were no significance tests? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp 66–115
Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2(8):e124
Oakes M (1986) Statistical inference. John Wiley, UK
Li X, Blizzard KK, Zeng Z, DeVries AC, Hurn PD, McCullough LD (2004) Chronic behavioral testing after focal ischemia in the mouse: functional recovery and the effects of gender. Exp Neurol 187:94–104
Plesnila N, Zinkel S, Le DA, Amin-Hanjani S, Wu Y, Qiu J, Chiarugi A, Thomas SS, Kohane DS, Korsmeyer SJ, Moskowitz MA (2001) BID mediates neuronal cell death after oxygen/ glucose deprivation and focal cerebral ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:15318–15323
Emerson JD, Moses LE (1985) A note on the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test for 2× k ordered tables. Biometrics 41:303–309
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Division of biostatistics. (1999) Power and sample size programs. December 1999, last updated October 2006 http://www.epibiostat.ucsf.edu/biostat/sampsize.html. Accessed 18 Feb 2009
Simon S (2000) Sample size for the Mann–Whitney U test, 28 September 2000, last modified 14 July 2008 http://www.childrensmercy.org/stats/size/mann.asp Accessed 15 Feb 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Humana Press
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Dirnagl, U. (2010). Statistics in Experimental Stroke Research: From Sample Size Calculation to Data Description and Significance Testing. In: Dirnagl, U. (eds) Rodent Models of Stroke. Neuromethods, vol 47. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-750-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-750-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-749-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-750-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols