Abstract
Proteomics data can be diverse and complex, and are typically produced on a large scale. To allow sharing and centralized storage and dissemination of such results, the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) has created a set of community standards for the exchange of mass spectrometry and protein interaction data. We describe the origins and overall concepts behind these standards, as well as the individual efforts that are ongoing in the field of mass spectrometry proteomics and protein interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
References
Ball, C. A. and Brazma, A. (2006) MGED standards: work in progress. OMICS 10(2), 138–144.
Kaiser, J. (2002) Proteomics. Public-private group maps out initiatives. Science 296(5569), 827.
Vizcaíno, J. A., Martens, L., Hermjakob, H., Julian, R. K., and Paton, N. W. (2007) The PSI formal document process and its implementation on the PSI website. Proteomics 7(14), 2355–2357.
Whetzel, P. L., Brinkman, R. R., Causton, H. C., et al. (2006) Development of FuGO: an ontology for functional genomics, investigations. OMICS 10(2), 199–204.
Wiley, H. S. and Michaels, G. S. (2004) Should software hold data hostage? Nat. Biotechnol. 22(8), 1037–1038.
Martens, L., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Hermjakob, H., et al. (2005) Do we want our data raw? Including binary mass spectrometry data in public proteomics data repositories. Proteomics 5(13), 3501–3505.
Pedrioli, P. G. A., Eng, J. K., Hubley, R., et al. (2004) A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research. Nat. Biotechnol. 22(11), 1459–1466.
Lin, S. M., Zhu, L., Winter, A. Q., Sasinowski, M., and Kibbe, W. A. (2005) What is mzXML good for? Expert Rev. Proteomics 2(6), 839–845.
Orchard, S., Hermjakob, H., Julian, R. K., et al. (2004) Common interchange standards for proteomics data: public availability of tools and schema. Proteomics 4(2), 490–491.
Orchard, S., Jones, A. R., Stephan, C., and Binz, P.-A. (2007) The HUPO precongress Proteomics Standards Initiative workshop. HUPO 5th annual World Congress. Long Beach, CA, 28 October–1 November 2006. Proteomics 7(7), 1006–1008.
Puig, O., Caspary, F., Rigaut, G., et al. (2001) The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24(3), 218–229.
Hermjakob, H., Montecchi-Palazzi L., Bader, G., et al. (2004) The HUPO PSI’s molecular interaction format—a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nat. Biotechnol. 22(2), 177–183.
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., et al. (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13(11), 2498–2504.
Editors. (2007) Democratizing proteomics data. Nat. Biotechnol. 25(3), 262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Martens, L., Palazzi, L.M., Hermjakob, H. (2008). Data Standards and Controlled Vocabularies for Proteomics. In: Thompson, J.D., Ueffing, M., Schaeffer-Reiss, C. (eds) Functional Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 484. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-398-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-398-1_18
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-971-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-398-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols