Abstract
Membrane proteins are essential vessels for cell communication both with other cells and noncellular structures. They modulate environment responses and mediate a myriad of biological processes. Dimerization and multimerization processes have been shown to further increase the already high specificity of these processes. Due to their central role in various cell and organism functions, these multimers are often associated with health conditions, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and diabetes, among others.
Understanding the membrane protein dimers’ interface takes advantage of the specificity of the structure, for which we must pinpoint the most relevant interfacial residues, since they are extremely likely to be crucial for complex formation. Here, we describe step by step our own in silico protocol to characterize these residues, making use of known experimental structures. We detail the computational pipeline from data acquisition and pre-processing to feature extraction. A molecular dynamics simulation protocol to further study membrane dimer proteins and their interfaces is also illustrated.
António J. Preto and Pedro Matos-Filipe contributed equally with all other contributors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Israelachvili JN, Marcelja S, Horn RG (1980) Physical principles of membrane organization. Q Rev Biophys 13(2):121–200
Chiu ML 2012 Introduction to membrane proteins. Curr Protoc Protein Sci Chapter 29:Unit 29.1
Gromiha MM, Ou YY (2014) Bioinformatics approaches for functional annotation of membrane proteins. Brief Bioinform 15(2):155–168
Papadopoulos DK et al (2012) Dimer formation via the homeodomain is required for function and specificity of Sex combs reduced in Drosophila. Dev Biol 367(1):78–89
Damian M et al (2018) GHSR-D2R heteromerization modulates dopamine signaling through an effect on G protein conformation. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Moraes I et al (2014) Membrane protein structure determination - the next generation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1838(1 Pt A):78–87
Almeida JG et al (2017) Membrane proteins structures: a review on computational modeling tools. Biochim Biophys Acta 1859(10):2021–2039
Melo R et al (2016) A machine learning approach for hot-spot detection at protein-protein interfaces. Int J Mol Sci 17(8):1215
Moreira IS et al (2017) SpotOn: high accuracy identification of protein-protein interface hot-spots. Sci Rep 7(1):8007
Bastanlar Y, Ozuysal M (2014) Introduction to machine learning. Methods Mol Biol 1107:105–128
Cook CE et al (2016) The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2016: data growth and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 44(Database issue):D20–D26
Greene CS et al (2016) Big data bioinformatics. Methods (San Diego, CA) 111:1–2
Gopinath RA, Burrus CS (1994) On upsampling, downsampling, and rational sampling rate filter banks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 42(4):812–824
Browne MW (2000) Cross-validation methods. J Math Psychol 44(1):108–132
Schumacher M, Hollander N, Sauerbrei W (1997) Resampling and cross-validation techniques: a tool to reduce bias caused by model building? Stat Med 16(24):2813–2827
Min S, Lee B, Yoon S (2017) Deep learning in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 18(5):851–869
Hajian-Tilaki K (2013) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med 4(2):627–635
McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M (1977) Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 267:585
Mori T et al (2016) Molecular dynamics simulations of biological membranes and membrane proteins using enhanced conformational sampling algorithms. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1858(7, Part B):1635–1651
Neves RPP et al (2013) Parameters for molecular dynamics simulations of manganese-containing metalloproteins. J Chem Theory Comput 9(6):2718–2732
Coimbra JT et al (2014) Biomembrane simulations of 12 lipid types using the general Amber force field in a tensionless ensemble. J Biomol Struct Dyn 32(1):88–103
Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ (2007) General performance of density functionals. J Phys Chem A 111(42):10439–10452
Comba P, Remenyi R (2003) Inorganic and bioinorganic molecular mechanics modeling—the problem of the force field parameterization. Coord Chem Rev 238–239:9–20
Nerenberg PS, Head-Gordon T (2018) New developments in force fields for biomolecular simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 49:129–138
Lopes PEM, Guvench O, MacKerell AD (2015) Current status of protein force fields for molecular dynamics. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 1215:47–71
Lyubartsev AP, Rabinovich AL (2016) Force field development for lipid membrane simulations. Biochim Biophys Acta 1858(10):2483–2497
Eichenberger AP et al (2011) GROMOS++ software for the analysis of biomolecular simulation trajectories. J Chem Theory Comput 7(10):3379–3390
Chandrasekhar I et al (2003) A consistent potential energy parameter set for lipids: dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine as a benchmark of the GROMOS96 45A3 force field. Eur Biophys J 32(1):67–77
Oostenbrink C et al (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25(13):1656–1676
Poger D, Van Gunsteren Wilfred F, Mark Alan E (2009) A new force field for simulating phosphatidylcholine bilayers. J Comput Chem 31(6):1117–1125
Berger O, Edholm O, Jähnig F (1997) Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine at full hydration, constant pressure, and constant temperature. Biophys J 72(5):2002–2013
Chiu S-W et al (2009) An improved united atom force field for simulation of mixed lipid bilayers. J Phys Chem B 113(9):2748–2763
Jämbeck JP, Lyubartsev AP (2012) Derivation and systematic validation of a refined all-atom force field for phosphatidylcholine lipids. J Phys Chem B 116(10):3164–3179
Pastor RW, MacKerell AD (2011) Development of the CHARMM force field for lipids. J Phys Chem Lett 2(13):1526–1532
Zhu X, Lopes PEM, Mackerell AD (2012) Recent developments and applications of the CHARMM force fields. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2(1):167–185
Feller SE et al (1997) Molecular dynamics simulation of unsaturated lipid bilayers at low hydration: Parameterization and comparison with diffraction studies. Biophys J 73(5):2269–2279
Feller SE, MacKerell AD Jr (2000) An improved empirical potential energy function for molecular simulations of phospholipids. J Phys Chem B 104(31):7510–7515
Klauda JB et al (2005) An ab initio study on the torsional surface of alkanes and its effect on molecular simulations of alkanes and a DPPC bilayer. J Phys Chem B 109(11):5300–5311
Klauda JB et al (2010) Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J Phys Chem B 114(23):7830–7843
Lim JB, Rogaski B, Klauda JB (2012) Update of the cholesterol force field parameters in CHARMM. J Phys Chem B 116(1):203–210
Wang J et al (2004) Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J Comput Chem 25(9):1157–1174
Dickson CJ et al (2012) GAFFlipid: a General Amber Force Field for the accurate molecular dynamics simulation of phospholipid. Soft Matter 8(37):9617–9627
Ogata K, Nakamura S (2015) Improvement of parameters of the AMBER potential force field for phospholipids for description of thermal phase transitions. J Phys Chem B 119(30):9726–9739
Skjevik AA et al (2012) LIPID11: a modular framework for lipid simulations using amber. J Phys Chem B 116(36):11124–11136
Dickson CJ et al (2014) Lipid14: the amber lipid force field. J Chem Theory Comput 10(2):865–879
Maciejewski A et al (2014) Refined OPLS all-atom force field for saturated phosphatidylcholine bilayers at full hydration. J Phys Chem B 118(17):4571–4581
Marrink SJ et al (2007) The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 111(27):7812–7824
Marrink SJ, De Vries AH, Mark AE (2004) Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations. J Phys Chem B 108(2):750–760
Jämbeck JPM, Lyubartsev AP (2012) Derivation and systematic validation of a refined all-atom force field for phosphatidylcholine lipids. J Phys Chem B 116(10):3164–3179
Demerdash O, Wang LP, Head-Gordon T (2018) Advanced models for water simulations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 8(1):e1355
Jorgensen WL et al (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79(2):926–935
Neria E, Fischer S, Karplus M (1996) Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 105(5):1902–1921
Berweger CD, van Gunsteren WF, Müller-Plathe F (1995) Force field parametrization by weak coupling. Re-engineering SPC water. Chem Phys Lett 232(5–6):429–436
Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP (1987) The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem 91(24):6269–6271
Wong-Ekkabut J, Karttunen M (2016) The good, the bad and the user in soft matter simulations. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1858(10):2529–2538
Khalili-Araghi F et al (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins under asymmetric ionic concentrations. J Gen Physiol 142(4):465–475
DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL molecular graphics system. Delano Scientific, San Carlos, CA
Berman HM et al (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):235–242
Case DA et al (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26(16):1668–1688
Brooks BR et al (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30(10):1545–1614
Christen M et al (2005) The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05. J Comput Chem 26(16):1719–1751
Das A, Ali SM (2018) Molecular dynamics simulation for the test of calibrated OPLS-AA force field for binary liquid mixture of tri-iso-amyl phosphate and n-dodecane. J Chem Phys 148(7):074502
Cock PJA et al (2009) Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25(11):1422–1423
Webb B, Sali A (2014) Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol 1137:1–15
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38
Cao DS et al (2013) PyDPI: freely available python package for chemoinformatics, bioinformatics, and chemogenomics studies. J Chem Inf Model 53(11):3086–3096
Chen Z et al (2018) iFeature: a python package and web server for features extraction and selection from protein and peptide sequences. Bioinformatics 34(14):2499–2502
Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12):2577–2637
Leaver-Fay A et al (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545–574
Altschul SF et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25(17):3389–3402
Ghahremanpour MM et al (2014) MemBuilder: a web-based graphical interface to build heterogeneously mixed membrane bilayers for the GROMACS biomolecular simulation program. Bioinformatics 30(3):439–441
Jefferys E et al (2015) Alchembed: a computational method for incorporating multiple proteins into complex lipid geometries. J Chem Theory Comput 11(6):2743–2754
Ruymgaart AP, Elber R (2012) Revisiting molecular dynamics on a CPU/GPU system: Water Kernel and SHAKE parallelization. J Chem Theory Comput 8(11):4624–4636
Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JG (1997) LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18:1463–1472
Chen Y et al (2016) Structure of the STRA6 receptor for retinol uptake. Science 353(6302):aad8266
Eswar N et al (2006) Comparative protein structure modeling using modeller. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 5:Unit 5.6
Miller S et al (1987) Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 196(3):641–656
Forst D et al (1998) Structure of the sucrose-specific porin ScrY from Salmonella typhimurium and its complex with sucrose. Nat Struct Biol 5:37
Chavent M, Duncan AL, Sansom MSP (2016) Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins and their interactions: from nanoscale to mesoscale. Curr Opin Struct Biol 40:8–16
Goñi FM (2014) The basic structure and dynamics of cell membranes: an update of the Singer–Nicolson model. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1838(6):1467–1476
van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW (2008) Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(2):112–124
Kulig W, Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M, Rog T (2015) Topologies, structures and parameter files for lipid simulations in GROMACS with the OPLS-aa force field: DPPC, POPC, DOPC, PEPC, and cholesterol. Data Brief 5:333–336
Lee AG (2005) How lipids and proteins interact in a membrane: a molecular approach. Mol BioSyst 1(3):203–212
Acknowledgments
Irina S. Moreira acknowledges support by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) Investigator programme—IF/00578/2014 (co-financed by European Social Fund and Programa Operacional Potencial Humano). This work was also financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through the Centro 2020 Regional Operational Programme under project CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000008: BrainHealth 2020. We also acknowledge the grants POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031356 and PTDC/QUI-OUT/32243/2017 financed by national funds through the FCT/MCTES and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), namely, under the following frameworks: “Projetos de Desenvolvimento e Implementação de Infraestruturas de Investigaçãoinseridas no RNIE”; “Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização—POCI”; “Programa Operacional Centro2020”; and/or State Budget.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Preto, A.J., Matos-Filipe, P., Koukos, P.I., Renault, P., Sousa, S.F., Moreira, I.S. (2019). Structural Characterization of Membrane Protein Dimers. In: Kister, A. (eds) Protein Supersecondary Structures. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1958. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9161-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9161-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9160-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9161-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols