Skip to main content

Current and Future Methods for mRNA Analysis: A Drive Toward Single Molecule Sequencing

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Gene Expression Analysis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1783))

Abstract

The transcriptome encompasses a range of species including messenger RNA, and other noncoding RNA such as rRNA, tRNA, and short and long noncoding RNAs. Due to the huge role played by mRNA in development and disease, several methods have been developed to sequence and characterize mRNA, with RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) emerging as the current method of choice particularly for large high-throughput studies. Short-read RNA-Seq which involves sequencing of short cDNA fragments and computationally assembling them to reconstruct the transcriptome, or aligning them to a reference is the most widely used approach. However, due to inherent limitations of this approach in de novo transcriptome assembly and isoform quantification, long-read RNA-Seq approaches, which also happen to be single molecule sequencing approaches, are increasingly becoming the standard for de novo transcriptome assembly and isoform quantification. In this chapter, we review the technical aspects of the current methods of RNA-Seq, both short and long-read approaches, and data analysis methods available. We discuss recent advances in single-cell RNA-Seq and direct RNA-Seq approaches, which perhaps will dominate the future of RNA-Seq.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brenner S, Jacob F, Meselson M (1961) An unstable intermediate carrying information from genes to ribosomes for protein synthesis. Nature 190:576–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alwine JC, Kemp DJ, Stark GR (1977) Method for detection of specific RNAs in agarose gels by transfer to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and hybridization with DNA probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74(12):5350–5354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Woods D, Crampton J, Clarke B, Williamson R (1980) The construction of a recombinant cDNA library representative of the poly(A)+ mRNA population from normal human lymphocytes. Nucleic Acids Res 8(22):5157–5168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams MD, Kelley JM, Gocayne JD, Dubnick M, Polymeropoulos MH, Xiao H, Merril CR, Wu A, Olde B, Moreno RF et al (1991) Complementary DNA sequencing: expressed sequence tags and human genome project. Science 252(5013):1651–1656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams MD, Dubnick M, Kerlavage AR, Moreno R, Kelley JM, Utterback TR, Nagle JW, Fields C, Venter JC (1992) Sequence identification of 2,375 human brain genes. Nature 355(6361):632–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/355632a0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (1995) Serial analysis of gene expression. Science 270(5235):484–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270(5235):467–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 5(7):621–628. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer ML, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437(7057):376–380. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03959

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, Brown CG, Hall KP, Evers DJ, Barnes CL, Bignell HR, Boutell JM, Bryant J, Carter RJ, Keira Cheetham R, Cox AJ, Ellis DJ, Flatbush MR, Gormley NA, Humphray SJ, Irving LJ, Karbelashvili MS, Kirk SM, Li H, Liu X, Maisinger KS, Murray LJ, Obradovic B, Ost T, Parkinson ML, Pratt MR, Rasolonjatovo IM, Reed MT, Rigatti R, Rodighiero C, Ross MT, Sabot A, Sankar SV, Scally A, Schroth GP, Smith ME, Smith VP, Spiridou A, Torrance PE, Tzonev SS, Vermaas EH, Walter K, Wu X, Zhang L, Alam MD, Anastasi C, Aniebo IC, Bailey DM, Bancarz IR, Banerjee S, Barbour SG, Baybayan PA, Benoit VA, Benson KF, Bevis C, Black PJ, Boodhun A, Brennan JS, Bridgham JA, Brown RC, Brown AA, Buermann DH, Bundu AA, Burrows JC, Carter NP, Castillo N, Chiara ECM, Chang S, Neil Cooley R, Crake NR, Dada OO, Diakoumakos KD, Dominguez-Fernandez B, Earnshaw DJ, Egbujor UC, Elmore DW, Etchin SS, Ewan MR, Fedurco M, Fraser LJ, Fuentes Fajardo KV, Scott Furey W, George D, Gietzen KJ, Goddard CP, Golda GS, Granieri PA, Green DE, Gustafson DL, Hansen NF, Harnish K, Haudenschild CD, Heyer NI, Hims MM, Ho JT, Horgan AM, Hoschler K, Hurwitz S, Ivanov DV, Johnson MQ, James T, Huw Jones TA, Kang GD, Kerelska TH, Kersey AD, Khrebtukova I, Kindwall AP, Kingsbury Z, Kokko-Gonzales PI, Kumar A, Laurent MA, Lawley CT, Lee SE, Lee X, Liao AK, Loch JA, Lok M, Luo S, Mammen RM, Martin JW, McCauley PG, McNitt P, Mehta P, Moon KW, Mullens JW, Newington T, Ning Z, Ling Ng B, Novo SM, O’Neill MJ, Osborne MA, Osnowski A, Ostadan O, Paraschos LL, Pickering L, Pike AC, Pike AC, Chris Pinkard D, Pliskin DP, Podhasky J, Quijano VJ, Raczy C, Rae VH, Rawlings SR, Chiva Rodriguez A, Roe PM, Rogers J, Rogert Bacigalupo MC, Romanov N, Romieu A, Roth RK, Rourke NJ, Ruediger ST, Rusman E, Sanches-Kuiper RM, Schenker MR, Seoane JM, Shaw RJ, Shiver MK, Short SW, Sizto NL, Sluis JP, Smith MA, Ernest Sohna Sohna J, Spence EJ, Stevens K, Sutton N, Szajkowski L, Tregidgo CL, Turcatti G, Vandevondele S, Verhovsky Y, Virk SM, Wakelin S, Walcott GC, Wang J, Worsley GJ, Yan J, Yau L, Zuerlein M, Rogers J, Mullikin JC, Hurles ME, McCooke NJ, West JS, Oaks FL, Lundberg PL, Klenerman D, Durbin R, Smith AJ (2008) Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456(7218):53–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR (2016) Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 17(6):333–351. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liedtke W, Battistini L, Brosnan CF, Raine CS (1994) A comparison of methods for RNA extraction from lymphocytes for RT-PCR. PCR Methods Appl 4(3):185–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng H, Zhang X, Zhang C (2015) mRIN for direct assessment of genome-wide and gene-specific mRNA integrity from large-scale RNA-sequencing data. Nat Commun 6:7816. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, Salowsky R, Leiber M, Gassmann M, Lightfoot S, Menzel W, Granzow M, Ragg T (2006) The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol Biol 7:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedegaard J, Thorsen K, Lund MK, Hein AM, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Vang S, Nordentoft I, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Kruhoffer M, Hager H, Knudsen B, Andersen CL, Sorensen KD, Pedersen JS, Orntoft TF, Dyrskjot L (2014) Next-generation sequencing of RNA and DNA isolated from paired fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of human cancer and normal tissue. PLoS One 9(5):e98187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffin M, Abu-El-Haija M, Abu-El-Haija M, Rokhlina T, Uc A (2012) Simplified and versatile method for isolation of high-quality RNA from pancreas. Biotechniques 52(5):332–334. https://doi.org/10.2144/0000113862

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pang X, Zhou D, Song Y, Pei D, Wang J, Guo Z, Yang R (2004) Bacterial mRNA purification by magnetic capture-hybridization method. Microbiol Immunol 48(2):91–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Su C, Sordillo LM (1998) A simple method to enrich mRNA from total prokaryotic RNA. Mol Biotechnol 10(1):83–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02745865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yi H, Cho YJ, Won S, Lee JE, Jin Yu H, Kim S, Schroth GP, Luo S, Chun J (2011) Duplex-specific nuclease efficiently removes rRNA for prokaryotic RNA-seq. Nucleic Acids Res 39(20):e140. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr617

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dunman PM, Murphy E, Haney S, Palacios D, Tucker-Kellogg G, Wu S, Brown EL, Zagursky RJ, Shlaes D, Projan SJ (2001) Transcription profiling-based identification of Staphylococcus aureus genes regulated by the agr and/or sarA loci. J Bacteriol 183(24):7341–7353. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.24.7341-7353.2001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McGrath KC, Thomas-Hall SR, Cheng CT, Leo L, Alexa A, Schmidt S, Schenk PM (2008) Isolation and analysis of mRNA from environmental microbial communities. J Microbiol Methods 75(2):172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.05.019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Davila Lopez M, Samuelsson T (2008) Early evolution of histone mRNA 3′ end processing. RNA (New York, NY) 14(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.782308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang H, Lim J, Ha M, Kim VN (2014) TAIL-seq: genome-wide determination of poly(A) tail length and 3′ end modifications. Mol Cell 53(6):1044–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ares M Jr (2013) Fragmentation of whole-transcriptome RNA using E. coli RNase III. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2013(5):479–481. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot074369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wery M, Descrimes M, Thermes C, Gautheret D, Morillon A (2013) Zinc-mediated RNA fragmentation allows robust transcript reassembly upon whole transcriptome RNA-Seq. Methods 63(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.03.009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu YY, Machleder EM, Chenchik A, Li R, Siebert PD (2001) Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART approach for full-length cDNA library construction. Biotechniques 30(4):892–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramskold D, Luo S, Wang YC, Li R, Deng Q, Faridani OR, Daniels GA, Khrebtukova I, Loring JF, Laurent LC, Schroth GP, Sandberg R (2012) Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat Biotechnol 30(8):777–782. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2282

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hrdlickova R, Toloue M, Tian B (2017) RNA-Seq methods for transcriptome analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews RNA 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Adiconis X, Borges-Rivera D, Satija R, DeLuca DS, Busby MA, Berlin AM, Sivachenko A, Thompson DA, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Gnirke A, Pochet N, Regev A, Levin JZ (2013) Comparative analysis of RNA sequencing methods for degraded or low-input samples. Nat Methods 10(7):623–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2483

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Arezi B, Hogrefe HH (2007) Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III epsilon subunit increases Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase fidelity and accuracy of RT-PCR procedures. Anal Biochem 360(1):84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2006.10.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McInerney P, Adams P, Hadi MZ (2014) Error rate comparison during polymerase chain reaction by DNA polymerase. Mol Biol Int 2014:287430. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/287430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pelechano V, Steinmetz LM (2013) Gene regulation by antisense transcription. Nat Rev Genet 14(12):880–893. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Levin JZ, Yassour M, Adiconis X, Nusbaum C, Thompson DA, Friedman N, Gnirke A, Regev A (2010) Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods. Nat Methods 7(9):709–715. http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v7/n9/abs/nmeth.1491.html#supplementary-information

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ball JK, Desselberger U (1992) The use of uracil-N-glycosylase in the preparation of PCR products for direct sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 20(12):3255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Parkinson NJ, Maslau S, Ferneyhough B, Zhang G, Gregory L, Buck D, Ragoussis J, Ponting CP, Fischer MD (2012) Preparation of high-quality next-generation sequencing libraries from picogram quantities of target DNA. Genome Res 22(1):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.124016.111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Caruccio N (2011) Preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries using Nextera technology: simultaneous DNA fragmentation and adaptor tagging by in vitro transposition. Methods Mol Biol 733:241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-089-8_17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Knierim E, Lucke B, Schwarz JM, Schuelke M, Seelow D (2011) Systematic comparison of three methods for fragmentation of long-range PCR products for next generation sequencing. PLoS One 6(11):e28240. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Poptsova MS, Il’icheva IA, Nechipurenko DY, Panchenko LA, Khodikov MV, Oparina NY, Polozov RV, Nechipurenko YD, Grokhovsky SL (2014) Non-random DNA fragmentation in next-generation sequencing. Sci Rep 4:4532. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04532

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar R, Ichihashi Y, Kimura S, Chitwood DH, Headland LR, Peng J, Maloof JN, Sinha NR (2012) A high-throughput method for illumina RNA-Seq library preparation. Front Plant Sci 3:202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00202

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Aird D, Ross MG, Chen WS, Danielsson M, Fennell T, Russ C, Jaffe DB, Nusbaum C, Gnirke A (2011) Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries. Genome Biol 12(2):R18. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Adey A, Morrison HG, Asan, Xun X, Kitzman JO, Turner EH, Stackhouse B, MacKenzie AP, Caruccio NC, Zhang X, Shendure J (2010) Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition. Genome Biol 11(12):R119. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Perkins TT, Kingsley RA, Fookes MC, Gardner PP, James KD, Yu L, Assefa SA, He M, Croucher NJ, Pickard DJ, Maskell DJ, Parkhill J, Choudhary J, Thomson NR, Dougan G (2009) A strand-specific RNA-Seq analysis of the transcriptome of the typhoid bacillus Salmonella typhi. PLoS Genet 5(7):e1000569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000569

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Acinas SG, Sarma-Rupavtarm R, Klepac-Ceraj V, Polz MF (2005) PCR-induced sequence artifacts and bias: insights from comparison of two 16S rRNA clone libraries constructed from the same sample. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8966–8969. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8966-8969.2005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Panichnantakul P, Bourgey M, Montpetit A, Bourque G, Riazalhosseini Y (2016) RNA-Seq as a tool to study the tumor microenvironment. Methods Mol Biol 1458:311–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3801-8_22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cock PJ, Fields CJ, Goto N, Heuer ML, Rice PM (2010) The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res 38(6):1767–1771. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Brown J, Pirrung M, McCue LA (2017) FQC Dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373

  47. Patel RK, Jain M (2012) NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One 7(2):e30619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang X, Liu D, Liu F, Wu J, Zou J, Xiao X, Zhao F, Zhu B (2013) HTQC: a fast quality control toolkit for Illumina sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 14:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15):2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hannon:lab (2009) FASTX-Toolkit. http://hannonlabcshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html

  51. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25(9):1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang K, Singh D, Zeng Z, Coleman SJ, Huang Y, Savich GL, He X, Mieczkowski P, Grimm SA, Perou CM, MacLeod JN, Chiang DY, Prins JF, Liu J (2010) MapSplice: accurate mapping of RNA-seq reads for splice junction discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 38(18):e178. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq622

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu TD, Reeder J, Lawrence M, Becker G, Brauer MJ (2016) GMAP and GSNAP for genomic sequence alignment: enhancements to speed, accuracy, and functionality. Methods Mol Biol 1418:283–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen Y, Souaiaia T, Chen T (2009) PerM: efficient mapping of short sequencing reads with periodic full sensitive spaced seeds. Bioinformatics 25(19):2514–2521. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Grant GR, Farkas MH, Pizarro AD, Lahens NF, Schug J, Brunk BP, Stoeckert CJ, Hogenesch JB, Pierce EA (2011) Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM). Bioinformatics 27(18):2518–2528. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr427

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Engstrom PG, Steijger T, Sipos B, Grant GR, Kahles A, Ratsch G, Goldman N, Hubbard TJ, Harrow J, Guigo R, Bertone P, Consortium R (2013) Systematic evaluation of spliced alignment programs for RNA-seq data. Nat Methods 10(12):1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Baruzzo G, Hayer KE, Kim EJ, Di Camillo B, FitzGerald GA, Grant GR (2017) Simulation-based comprehensive benchmarking of RNA-seq aligners. Nat Methods 14(2):135–139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Novocraft (2010) Novoalign. http://www.novocraft.com/products/novoalign/

  60. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL (2013) TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol 14(4):R36. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. DeLuca DS, Levin JZ, Sivachenko A, Fennell T, Nazaire MD, Williams C, Reich M, Winckler W, Getz G (2012) RNA-SeQC: RNA-seq metrics for quality control and process optimization. Bioinformatics 28(11):1530–1532. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang L, Wang S, Li W (2012) RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 28(16):2184–2185. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30(7):923–930. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Li B, Dewey CN (2011) RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12:323. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-323

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Roberts A, Pachter L (2013) Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments. Nat Methods 10(1):71–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Patro R, Mount SM, Kingsford C (2014) Sailfish enables alignment-free isoform quantification from RNA-seq reads using lightweight algorithms. Nat Biotechnol 32(5):462–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2862

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L (2016) Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol 34(5):525–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 28(5):511–515. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1621

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Picelli S, Bjorklund AK, Faridani OR, Sagasser S, Winberg G, Sandberg R (2013) Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat Methods 10(11):1096–1098. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Zheng W, Chung LM, Zhao H (2011) Bias detection and correction in RNA-Sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 12:290. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Wellenreuther R, Schupp I, Poustka A, Wiemann S, German c DNAC (2004) SMART amplification combined with cDNA size fractionation in order to obtain large full-length clones. BMC Genomics 5(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Hansen KD, Brenner SE, Dudoit S (2010) Biases in Illumina transcriptome sequencing caused by random hexamer priming. Nucleic Acids Res 38(12):e131. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq224

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Love MI, Hogenesch JB, Irizarry RA (2016) Modeling of RNA-seq fragment sequence bias reduces systematic errors in transcript abundance estimation. Nat Biotechnol 34(12):1287–1291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Evans C, Hardin J, Stoebel DM (2017) Selecting between-sample RNA-Seq normalization methods from the perspective of their assumptions. Brief Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx008

  75. Oshlack A, Robinson MD, Young MD (2010) From RNA-seq reads to differential expression results. Genome Biol 11(12):220. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C (2017) Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods 14(4):417–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4197

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Dillies MA, Rau A, Aubert J, Hennequet-Antier C, Jeanmougin M, Servant N, Keime C, Marot G, Castel D, Estelle J, Guernec G, Jagla B, Jouneau L, Laloe D, Le Gall C, Schaeffer B, Le Crom S, Guedj M, Jaffrezic F, French StatOmique C (2013) A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Bioinform 14(6):671–683. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19(2):185–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Anders S, Huber W (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11(10):R106. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Robinson MD, Oshlack A (2010) A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 11(3):R25. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26(1):139–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Li J, Witten DM, Johnstone IM, Tibshirani R (2012) Normalization, testing, and false discovery rate estimation for RNA-sequencing data. Biostatistics 13(3):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxr031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Kadota K, Nishiyama T, Shimizu K (2012) A normalization strategy for comparing tag count data. Algorithms Mol Biol 7(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-7-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Bullard JH, Purdom E, Hansen KD, Dudoit S (2010) Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 11:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Loven J, Orlando DA, Sigova AA, Lin CY, Rahl PB, Burge CB, Levens DL, Lee TI, Young RA (2012) Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell 151(3):476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Risso D, Ngai J, Speed TP, Dudoit S (2014) Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. Nat Biotechnol 32(9):896–902. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2931

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Rapaport F, Khanin R, Liang Y, Pirun M, Krek A, Zumbo P, Mason CE, Socci ND, Betel D (2013) Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 14(9):R95. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Hardcastle TJ, Kelly KA (2010) baySeq: empirical Bayesian methods for identifying differential expression in sequence count data. BMC Bioinformatics 11:422. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-422

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK (2015) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43(7):e47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Tyner C, Barber GP, Casper J, Clawson H, Diekhans M, Eisenhart C, Fischer CM, Gibson D, Gonzalez JN, Guruvadoo L, Haeussler M, Heitner S, Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D, Lee BT, Lee CM, Nejad P, Raney BJ, Rosenbloom KR, Speir ML, Villarreal C, Vivian J, Zweig AS, Haussler D, Kuhn RM, Kent WJ (2017) The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res 45(D1):D626–D634. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Aken BL, Ayling S, Barrell D, Clarke L, Curwen V, Fairley S, Fernandez Banet J, Billis K, Garcia Giron C, Hourlier T, Howe K, Kahari A, Kokocinski F, Martin FJ, Murphy DN, Nag R, Ruffier M, Schuster M, Tang YA, Vogel JH, White S, Zadissa A, Flicek P, Searle SM (2016) The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database (Oxford). https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baw093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP (2013) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 14(2):178–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Fiume M, Williams V, Brook A, Brudno M (2010) Savant: genome browser for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 26(16):1938–1944. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Roge X, Zhang X (2014) RNAseqViewer: visualization tool for RNA-Seq data. Bioinformatics 30(6):891–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Li Y, Rao X, Mattox WW, Amos CI, Liu B (2015) RNA-Seq analysis of differential splice junction usage and intron retentions by DEXSeq. PLoS One 10(9):e0136653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Katz Y, Wang ET, Silterra J, Schwartz S, Wong B, Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP, Airoldi EM, Burge CB (2015) Quantitative visualization of alternative exon expression from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 31(14):2400–2402. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Liu Q, Chen C, Shen E, Zhao F, Sun Z, Wu J (2012) Detection, annotation and visualization of alternative splicing from RNA-Seq data with SplicingViewer. Genomics 99(3):178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.12.003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Barann M, Zimmer R, Birzele F (2017) Manananggal – a novel viewer for alternative splicing events. BMC Bioinformatics 18(1):120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1548-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Kanitz A, Gypas F, Gruber AJ, Gruber AR, Martin G, Zavolan M (2015) Comparative assessment of methods for the computational inference of transcript isoform abundance from RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 16:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0702-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Nariai N, Kojima K, Mimori T, Sato Y, Kawai Y, Yamaguchi-Kabata Y, Nagasaki M (2014) TIGAR2: sensitive and accurate estimation of transcript isoform expression with longer RNA-Seq reads. BMC Genomics 15(Suppl 10):S5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-S10-S5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Glaus P, Honkela A, Rattray M (2012) Identifying differentially expressed transcripts from RNA-seq data with biological variation. Bioinformatics 28(13):1721–1728. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts260

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Hensman J, Papastamoulis P, Glaus P, Honkela A, Rattray M (2015) Fast and accurate approximate inference of transcript expression from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 31(24):3881–3889. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv483

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Angelini C, De Canditiis D, De Feis I (2014) Computational approaches for isoform detection and estimation: good and bad news. BMC Bioinformatics 15:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Steijger T, Abril JF, Engstrom PG, Kokocinski F, Hubbard TJ, Guigo R, Harrow J, Bertone P (2013) Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq. Nat Methods 10(12):1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2714

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Au KF, Sebastiano V, Afshar PT, Durruthy JD, Lee L, Williams BA, van Bakel H, Schadt EE, Reijo-Pera RA, Underwood JG, Wong WH (2013) Characterization of the human ESC transcriptome by hybrid sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(50):E4821–E4830. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320101110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Sharon D, Tilgner H, Grubert F, Snyder M (2013) A single-molecule long-read survey of the human transcriptome. Nat Biotechnol 31(11):1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, Tapanari E, Diekhans M, Kokocinski F, Aken BL, Barrell D, Zadissa A, Searle S, Barnes I, Bignell A, Boychenko V, Hunt T, Kay M, Mukherjee G, Rajan J, Despacio-Reyes G, Saunders G, Steward C, Harte R, Lin M, Howald C, Tanzer A, Derrien T, Chrast J, Walters N, Balasubramanian S, Pei B, Tress M, Rodriguez JM, Ezkurdia I, van Baren J, Brent M, Haussler D, Kellis M, Valencia A, Reymond A, Gerstein M, Guigo R, Hubbard TJ (2012) GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res 22(9):1760–1774. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.135350.111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Bang ML, Centner T, Fornoff F, Geach AJ, Gotthardt M, McNabb M, Witt CC, Labeit D, Gregorio CC, Granzier H, Labeit S (2001) The complete gene sequence of titin, expression of an unusual approximately 700-kDa titin isoform, and its interaction with obscurin identify a novel Z-line to I-band linking system. Circ Res 89(11):1065–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Braslavsky I, Hebert B, Kartalov E, Quake SR (2003) Sequence information can be obtained from single DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(7):3960–3964. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0230489100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Rhoads A, Au KF (2015) PacBio sequencing and its applications. Genom Proteom Bioinform 13(5):278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2015.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, Luong K, Lyle J, Otto G, Peluso P, Rank D, Baybayan P, Bettman B, Bibillo A, Bjornson K, Chaudhuri B, Christians F, Cicero R, Clark S, Dalal R, Dewinter A, Dixon J, Foquet M, Gaertner A, Hardenbol P, Heiner C, Hester K, Holden D, Kearns G, Kong X, Kuse R, Lacroix Y, Lin S, Lundquist P, Ma C, Marks P, Maxham M, Murphy D, Park I, Pham T, Phillips M, Roy J, Sebra R, Shen G, Sorenson J, Tomaney A, Travers K, Trulson M, Vieceli J, Wegener J, Wu D, Yang A, Zaccarin D, Zhao P, Zhong F, Korlach J, Turner S (2009) Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323(5910):133–138. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Gonzalez-Garay ML (2016) Introduction to isoform sequencing using pacific biosciences technology (Iso-Seq). In: Wu J (ed) Transcriptomics and gene regulation. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7450-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  113. PacBio (2017) SMRT Link pipeline. https://githubcom/PacificBiosciences/SMRT-Link/

    Google Scholar 

  114. Wu TD, Watanabe CK (2005) GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 21(9):1859–1875. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Chaisson MJ, Tesler G (2012) Mapping single molecule sequencing reads using basic local alignment with successive refinement (BLASR): application and theory. BMC Bioinformatics 13:238. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-238

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. PacBio (2015) Optimizing STAR aligner for Iso Seq data. https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/cDNA_primer/wiki/Bioinfx-study:-Optimizing-STAR-aligner-for-Iso-Seq-data

  117. Skelley T (2015) MatchAnnot. GitHub repository. https://github.com/TomSkelly/MatchAnnot

  118. Fu J (2015) IsoView. https://github.com/JMF47/IsoView

  119. Hu J, Uapinyoying P, Goecks J (2017) Interactive analysis of Long-read RNA isoforms with Iso-Seq Browser. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/102905

  120. Tardaguila M, de la Fuente L, Marti C, Pereira C, del Risco H, Ferrell M, Mellado M, Macchietto M, Verheggen K, Edelmann M, Ezkurdia I, Vazquez J, Tress M, Mortazavi A, Martens L, Rodriguez-Navarro S, Moreno V, Conesa A (2017) SQANTI: extensive characterization of long read transcript sequences for quality control in full-length transcriptome identification and quantification. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/118083

  121. Wang L, Park HJ, Dasari S, Wang S, Kocher JP, Li W (2013) CPAT: Coding-Potential Assessment Tool using an alignment-free logistic regression model. Nucleic Acids Res 41(6):e74. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Li A, Zhang J, Zhou Z (2014) PLEK: a tool for predicting long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs based on an improved k-mer scheme. BMC Bioinformatics 15:311. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. PacBio (2016) ANGEL. GitHub repository. https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/ANGEL

  124. Au:Lab (2014) SpliceMap-LSC-IDP. https://www.healthcareuiowa.edu/labs/au/IDP/

  125. Weirather JL, Afshar PT, Clark TA, Tseng E, Powers LS, Underwood JG, Zabner J, Korlach J, Wong WH, Au KF (2015) Characterization of fusion genes and the significantly expressed fusion isoforms in breast cancer by hybrid sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 43(18):e116. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv562

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. PacBio (2017) Pacific Biosciences repository. https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/

  127. Larsen PA, Smith TP (2012) Application of circular consensus sequencing and network analysis to characterize the bovine IgG repertoire. BMC Immunol 13:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-13-52

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Mascher M, Gundlach H, Himmelbach A, Beier S, Twardziok SO, Wicker T, Radchuk V, Dockter C, Hedley PE, Russell J, Bayer M, Ramsay L, Liu H, Haberer G, Zhang X-Q, Zhang Q, Barrero RA, Li L, Taudien S, Groth M, Felder M, Hastie A, Šimková H, Staňková H, Vrána J, Chan S, Muñoz-Amatriaín M, Ounit R, Wanamaker S, Bolser D, Colmsee C, Schmutzer T, Aliyeva-Schnorr L, Grasso S, Tanskanen J, Chailyan A, Sampath D, Heavens D, Clissold L, Cao S, Chapman B, Dai F, Han Y, Li H, Li X, Lin C, McCooke JK, Tan C, Wang P, Wang S, Yin S, Zhou G, Poland JA, Bellgard MI, Borisjuk L, Houben A, Doležel J, Ayling S, Lonardi S, Kersey P, Langridge P, Muehlbauer GJ, Clark MD, Caccamo M, Schulman AH, Mayer KFX, Platzer M, Close TJ, Scholz U, Hansson M, Zhang G, Braumann I, Spannagl M, Li C, Waugh R, Stein N (2017) A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544(7651):427–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22043. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v544/n7651/abs/nature22043.html#supplementary-information

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Hoang NV, Furtado A, Mason PJ, Marquardt A, Kasirajan L, Thirugnanasambandam PP, Botha FC, Henry RJ (2017) A survey of the complex transcriptome from the highly polyploid sugarcane genome using full-length isoform sequencing and de novo assembly from short read sequencing. BMC Genomics 18(1):395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3757-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Clavijo BJ, Venturini L, Schudoma C, Accinelli GG, Kaithakottil G, Wright J, Borrill P, Kettleborough G, Heavens D, Chapman H, Lipscombe J, Barker T, Lu FH, McKenzie N, Raats D, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Coince A, Peel N, Percival-Alwyn L, Duncan O, Trosch J, Yu G, Bolser DM, Namaati G, Kerhornou A, Spannagl M, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Davey RP, Fosker C, Palma FD, Phillips AL, Millar AH, Kersey PJ, Uauy C, Krasileva KV, Swarbreck D, Bevan MW, Clark MD (2017) An improved assembly and annotation of the allohexaploid wheat genome identifies complete families of agronomic genes and provides genomic evidence for chromosomal translocations. Genome Res 27(5):885–896. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.217117.116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Kuo RI, Tseng E, Eory L, Paton IR, Archibald AL, Burt DW (2017) Normalized long read RNA sequencing in chicken reveals transcriptome complexity similar to human. BMC Genomics 18(1):323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3691-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Prall TM, Graham ME, Karl JA, Wiseman RW, Ericsen AJ, Raveendran M, Alan Harris R, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA, Rogers J, O’Connor DH (2017) Improved full-length killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor transcript discovery in Mauritian cynomolgus macaques. Immunogenetics 69(5):325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-017-0977-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Criscione SW, Theodosakis N, Micevic G, Cornish TC, Burns KH, Neretti N, Rodić N (2016) Genome-wide characterization of human L1 antisense promoter-driven transcripts. BMC Genomics 17(1):463. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2800-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Liu X, Mei W, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Barbazuk WB (2017) Detecting alternatively spliced transcript isoforms from single-molecule long-read sequences without a reference genome. Mol Ecol Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12670

  135. Kasianowicz JJ, Brandin E, Branton D, Deamer DW (1996) Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(24):13770–13773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Loman NJ, Watson M (2015) Successful test launch for nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods 12(4):303–304. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Oikonomopoulos S, Wang YC, Djambazian H, Badescu D, Ragoussis J (2016) Benchmarking of the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing for quantitative and qualitative assessment of cDNA populations. Sci Rep 6:31602. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31602

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Bolisetty MT, Rajadinakaran G, Graveley BR (2015) Determining exon connectivity in complex mRNAs by nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol 16:204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0777-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Weirather J, de Cesare M, Wang Y, Piazza P, Sebastiano V, Wang X, Buck D, Au K (2017) Comprehensive comparison of Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies and their applications to transcriptome analysis [version 1; referees: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Res 6:100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. ONT (2016) Nanonet. https://github.com/nanoporetech/nanonet

  141. David M, Dursi LJ, Yao D, Boutros PC, Simpson JT (2017) Nanocall: an open source basecaller for Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Bioinformatics 33(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Boza V, Brejova B, Vinar T (2017) DeepNano: deep recurrent neural networks for base calling in MinION nanopore reads. PLoS One 12(6):e0178751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178751

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Loman NJ, Quinlan AR (2014) Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing nanopore sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(23):3399–3401. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu555

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Watson M, Thomson M, Risse J, Talbot R, Santoyo-Lopez J, Gharbi K, Blaxter M (2015) poRe: an R package for the visualization and analysis of nanopore sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31(1):114–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Leggett RM, Heavens D, Caccamo M, Clark MD, Davey RP (2016) NanoOK: multi-reference alignment analysis of nanopore sequencing data, quality and error profiles. Bioinformatics 32(1):142–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. http://minotour.nottingham.ac.uk/.

  147. Byrne A, Beaudin AE, Olsen HE, Jain M, Cole C, Palmer T, DuBois RM, Forsberg EC, Akeson M, Vollmers C (2017) Nanopore long-read RNAseq reveals widespread transcriptional variation among the surface receptors of individual. B cells Nat Commun 8:16027. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16027

  148. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF (2002) Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 18(3):452–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Kielbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC (2011) Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res 21(3):487–493. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.113985.110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Jain M, Fiddes IT, Miga KH, Olsen HE, Paten B, Akeson M (2015) Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer. Nat Methods 12(4):351–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Sovic I, Sikic M, Wilm A, Fenlon SN, Chen S, Nagarajan N (2016) Fast and sensitive mapping of nanopore sequencing reads with GraphMap. Nat Commun 7:11307. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Krizanovic K, Echchiki A, Roux J, Sikic M (2017) Evaluation of tools for long read RNA-seq splice-aware alignment. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx668

  154. Brian B (2014) BBMap. https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/

  155. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2015) HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12(4):357–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Weirather J, de Cesare M, Wang Y, Piazza P, Sebastiano V, Wang X, Buck D, Au K (2017) Comprehensive comparison of Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies and their applications to transcriptome analysis [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Res 6:100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Koren S, Schatz MC, Walenz BP, Martin J, Howard JT, Ganapathy G, Wang Z, Rasko DA, McCombie WR, Jarvis ED, Adam MP (2012) Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nat Biotechnol 30(7):693–700. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Au KF, Underwood JG, Lee L, Wong WH (2012) Improving PacBio long read accuracy by short read alignment. PLoS One 7(10):e46679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Hackl T, Hedrich R, Schultz J, Forster F (2014) proovread: large-scale high-accuracy PacBio correction through iterative short read consensus. Bioinformatics 30(21):3004–3011. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Abdel-Ghany SE, Hamilton M, Jacobi JL, Ngam P, Devitt N, Schilkey F, Ben-Hur A, Reddy AS (2016) A survey of the sorghum transcriptome using single-molecule long reads. Nat Commun 7:11706. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11706

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Koren S, Schatz MC, Walenz BP, Martin J, Howard JT, Ganapathy G, Wang Z, Rasko DA, McCombie WR, Jarvis ED, Phillippy AM (2012) Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nat Biotechnol 30(7):693–700. http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v30/n7/abs/nbt.2280.html#supplementary-information

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Vilfan ID, Tsai Y-C, Clark TA, Wegener J, Dai Q, Yi C, Pan T, Turner SW, Korlach J (2013) Analysis of RNA base modification and structural rearrangement by single-molecule real-time detection of reverse transcription. J Nanobiotechnol 11(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-11-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Tilgner H, Jahanbani F, Blauwkamp T, Moshrefi A, Jaeger E, Chen F, Harel I, Bustamante CD, Rasmussen M, Snyder MP (2015) Comprehensive transcriptome analysis using synthetic long-read sequencing reveals molecular co-association of distant splicing events. Nat Biotechnol 33(7):736–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Ozsolak F, Platt AR, Jones DR, Reifenberger JG, Sass LE, McInerney P, Thompson JF, Bowers J, Jarosz M, Milos PM (2009) Direct RNA sequencing. Nature 461(7265):814–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Raz T, Causey M, Jones DR, Kieu A, Letovsky S, Lipson D, Thayer E, Thompson JF, Milos PM (2011) RNA sequencing and quantitation using the Helicos Genetic Analysis System. Methods Mol Biol 733:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-089-8_3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. Garalde DR, Snell EA, Jachimowicz D, Heron AJ, Bruce M, Lloyd J, Warland A, Pantic N, Admassu T, Ciccone J, Serra S, Keenan J, Martin S, McNeill L, Wallace J, Jayasinghe L, Wright C, Blasco J, Sipos B, Young S, Juul S, Clarke J, Turner DJ (2016) Highly parallel direct RNA sequencing on an array of nanopores. bioRxiv

    Google Scholar 

  167. Ross MG, Russ C, Costello M, Hollinger A, Lennon NJ, Hegarty R, Nusbaum C, Jaffe DB (2013) Characterizing and measuring bias in sequence data. Genome Biol 14(5):R51. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Xiao Z, Guifang J (2016) RNA epigenetic modification: N6-methyladenosine. Yi Chuan 38(4):275–288. https://doi.org/10.16288/j.yczz.16-049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Quick J, Quinlan AR, Loman NJ (2014) A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the MinION portable single-molecule nanopore sequencer. Gigascience 3:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217x-3-22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Loman NJ, Quick J, Simpson JT (2015) A complete bacterial genome assembled de novo using only nanopore sequencing data. Nat Methods 12(8):733–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Cretu Stancu M, van Roosmalen MJ, Renkens I, Nieboer M, Middelkamp S, de Ligt J, Pregno G, Giachino D, Mandrile G, Espejo Valle-Inclan J, Korzelius J, de Bruijn E, Cuppen E, Talkowski ME, Marschall T, de Ridder J, Kloosterman WP (2017) Mapping and phasing of structural variation in patient genomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat Commun 8(1):1326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01343-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Perkel JM (2017) Single-cell sequencing made simple. Nature 547(7661):125–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/547125a

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Grun D, Lyubimova A, Kester L, Wiebrands K, Basak O, Sasaki N, Clevers H, van Oudenaarden A (2015) Single-cell messenger RNA sequencing reveals rare intestinal cell types. Nature 525(7568):251–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Tirosh I, Izar B, Prakadan SM, Wadsworth MH, Treacy D, Trombetta JJ, Rotem A, Rodman C, Lian C, Murphy G, Fallahi-Sichani M, Dutton-Regester K, Lin J-R, Cohen O, Shah P, Lu D, Genshaft AS, Hughes TK, Ziegler CGK, Kazer SW, Gaillard A, Kolb KE, Villani A-C, Johannessen CM, Andreev AY, Van Allen EM, Bertagnolli M, Sorger PK, Sullivan RJ, Flaherty KT, Frederick DT, Jané-Valbuena J, Yoon CH, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Shalek AK, Regev A, Garraway LA (2016) Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352(6282):189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Picelli S, Faridani OR, Bjorklund AK, Winberg G, Sagasser S, Sandberg R (2014) Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat Protoc 9(1):171–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, Nemesh J, Shekhar K, Goldman M, Tirosh I, Bialas AR, Kamitaki N, Martersteck EM, Trombetta JJ, Weitz DA, Sanes JR, Shalek AK, Regev A, McCarroll SA (2015) Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161(5):1202–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P, Ryvkin P, Bent ZW, Wilson R, Ziraldo SB, Wheeler TD, McDermott GP, Zhu J, Gregory MT, Shuga J, Montesclaros L, Masquelier DA, Nishimura SY, Schnall-Levin M, Wyatt PW, Hindson CM, Bharadwaj R, Wong A, Ness KD, Beppu LW, Deeg J, McFarland C, Loeb KR, Valente WJ, Ericson NG, Stevens EA, Radich JP, Mikkelsen TS, Hindson BJ, Bielas JH (2017) Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 8:14049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. Tang F, Barbacioru C, Nordman E, Li B, Xu N, Bashkirov VI, Lao K, Surani MA (2010) RNA-Seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell. Nat Protoc 5(3):516–535. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. Karlsson K, Linnarsson S (2017) Single-cell mRNA isoform diversity in the mouse brain. BMC Genomics 18(1):126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3528-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  180. Canales RD, Luo Y, Willey JC, Austermiller B, Barbacioru CC, Boysen C, Hunkapiller K, Jensen RV, Knight CR, Lee KY, Ma Y, Maqsodi B, Papallo A, Peters EH, Poulter K, Ruppel PL, Samaha RR, Shi L, Yang W, Zhang L, Goodsaid FM (2006) Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms. Nat Biotechnol 24(9):1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiannis Ragoussis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Bayega, A., Fahiminiya, S., Oikonomopoulos, S., Ragoussis, J. (2018). Current and Future Methods for mRNA Analysis: A Drive Toward Single Molecule Sequencing. In: Raghavachari, N., Garcia-Reyero, N. (eds) Gene Expression Analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1783. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7834-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7834-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7833-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7834-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics