Abstract
Many soniferous fishes such as cods and groupers are commercially important. Sounds are produced during courtship and spawning, and there is the potential for aquatic noise to interfere with critical behaviors and affect populations. There are few data on the response of wild populations of sound-producing fishes to acoustic noise. New motion and sound exposure fish tags could be used to assess the behavioral responses of large numbers of fish to noise exposure. Many factors, such as fishing mortality and environmental variability in prey supply, could also affect populations and potentially interact with the behavioral responses to noise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amorim MC, Simões JM, Almada V, Fonseca P (2011) Stereotypy and variation of the mating call in the Lusitanian toadfish, Halobatrachus didactylus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:707–716
Barimo JF, Fine ML (1998) Relationship of swim-bladder shape to the directionality pattern of underwater sound in the oyster toadfish. Can J Zool 76:134–143
Fish JF, Offutt GC (1971) Hearing thresholds from toadfish, Opsanus tau, measured in the laboratory and field. J Acoust Soc Am 51:1318–1321
Fish MP, Mowbray WH (1970) Sounds of the Western North Atlantic fishes. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
Hazlett B, Winn HE (1962) Sound producing mechanism of the Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus. Copeia 1962:447–449
Johnson MP, Tyack PL (2003) A digital acoustic recording tag for measuring the response of wild marine mammals to sound. IEEE J Ocean Eng 28:3–12. doi:10.1109/JOE.2002.808212
Locascio JV, Mann DA (2008) Diel periodicity of fish sound production in Charlotte Harbor, FL. Trans Am Fish Soc 137:606–615
Locascio JV, Mann DA (2011) Localization and source level estimates of black drum (Pogonias cromis) calls. J Acous Soc Am 130:1868–1879
Mann D, Locascio J, Schärer M, Nemeth M, Appeldoorn R (2010) Sound production by red hind (Epinephelus guttatus) in spatially segregated spawning aggregations. Aquat Biol 10:149–154
Mann DA, Grothues TM (2009) Short-term upwelling events modulate fish sound production at a mid-Atlantic ocean observatory. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 375:65–71
National Marine Fisheries Service (2012) Annual commercial landing statistics. http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/commercial/landings/annual_landings.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2012
Nelson MD, Koenig CC, Coleman FC, Mann DA (2011) Sound production of red grouper (Epinephelus morio) on the West Florida Shelf. Aquat Biol 12:97–108
Ramcharitar JU, Higgs DM, Popper AN (2006) Audition in sciaenid fishes with different swim bladder-inner ear configurations. J Acoust Soc Am 119:439–443
Schärer MT, Nemeth MI, Mann D, Locascio J, Appeldoorn RS, Rowell TJ (2012) Sound production and reproductive behavior of yellowfin grouper, Mycteroperca venenosa (Serranidae) at a spawning aggregation. Copeia 2012:136–145
Sisneros JA, Bass AH (2005) Ontogenetic changes in the response properties of individual, primary auditory afferents in the vocal plainfin midshipman fish Porichthys notatus Girard. J Exp Biol 208:3121–3131. doi:10.1242/jeb.01742
Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) (2009) Stock assessment of red grouper in the Gulf of Mexico. Report of Assessment Workshop, Miami, FL
Tavolga WN (1958) Underwater sounds produced by two species of toadfish, Opsanus tau and Opsanus beta. Bull Mar Sci 8:278–284
Thorson RF, Fine ML (2002) Acoustic competition in the gulf toadfish Opsanus beta: acoustic tagging. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2302–2307
Wall CC, Lembke C, Mann D (2012) Shelf-scale mapping of sound production by fishes in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, using autonomous glider technology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 449:55–64
Acknowledgments
James Locascio, Carrie Wall, and Misty Nelson were instrumental in the discovery and description of numerous fish sounds over the past 8 years. Chris Koenig and Felicia Coleman from Florida State University and Richard Appeldoorn, Michelle Schärer, and Michael Nemeth from the University of Puerto Rico collaborated on the grouper studies. Funding for these studies came from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, CCRI, and the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mann, D.A. (2016). Acoustic Communication in Fishes and Potential Effects of Noise. In: Popper, A., Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 875. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_81
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_81
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2980-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2981-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)