Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Response to Intervention pp 235–252Cite as

Classroom Reading Instruction for All Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

How well students respond to reading instruction in the classroom is instrumental in determining their academic outcomes. This chapter explains why this first tier of instruction in the classroom is at a critical juncture with the adoption of rigorous college and career readiness standards (e.g., the common core state standards in English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects; ELA CCSS for short). First, the ELA CCSS is overviewed and the key constructs of academic language, text complexity, and perspective taking are discussed. Second, the research-based practices in primary-grade reading instruction for teaching academic language skills, providing explicit instruction in the alphabetic skills, teaching word analysis skills, and ensuring daily practice in text reading with and without feedback in order to build accuracy, fluency, and comprehension are reviewed. Third, the research-based practices for content-area tier 1 reading instruction in the secondary grades are discussed. Specifically, the chapter focuses on providing explicit vocabulary and comprehension instruction, ensuring opportunities for extended discussion of text, and increasing student motivation and engagement in literacy learning. The authors conclude with a table summarizing best practices for tier 1 reading instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACT. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 171–184. doi:10.3200/JOER.97.4.171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association. (Winter, 2009). Ensuring early literacy success. Research Points, 6(1), 1–4. http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/Publications/Ensuring%20Early%20Literary%20Success.pdf.

  • Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Education Research Journal, 40, 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apthorp, H. S. (2006). Effects of a supplemental vocabulary program in third-grade reading/language arts. Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apthorp, H., Randel, B., Cherasaro, T., Clark, T., McKeown, M., & Beck, I. (2012). Effects of a supplemental vocabulary program on word knowledge and passage comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(2), 160–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Meyer, J. (1991). Improving content area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. K., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (1998). Vocabulary acquisition: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kame’enui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 183–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young children’s oral vocabulary repertories through rich and focused instruction. Elementary School Journal, 107, 251–271. doi:10.1086/511706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Omanson, R. C. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of NewYork (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct, and sequential. The American Educator, 25(1), 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 44–62. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Fisher, P. J. L., Ogle, D., & Watts-Taffe, S. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 524–539. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.4.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, C. C. (1993). Strategy instruction in a literature-based reading program. Elementary School Journal, 94, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M. D., Simmons, D. C., Kame’Enui, E. J., & Stoolmiller, M. (2004a). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality, 12(3), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M. D., Kame’Enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Harn, B. A. (2004b). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 90–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M., McCoach, D., Loftus, S., Zipoli, R., & Kapp, S. (2009). Direct vocabulary instruction in kindergarten: Teaching for breadth versus depth. Elementary School Journal, 110, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, C. A., Kethley, C., Nimon, K., Kurz, T. B., Mathes, P. G., Shih, M., & Swanson, E. A. (2010). Effectiveness of a supplemental early reading intervention scaled up in multiple schools. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 394–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62–88. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.1.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, D. (1978–1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). Instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 1–44. doi:10.1080/19345740802539200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., & Connor, C. (2011). Primary reading. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, & E. Moje (Eds.), Handbook on reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 136–156). New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B., Breier, J., & Fletcher, J. (2003a). Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 24(2–3), 613–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B., Seals, L., Anthony, J., & Pollard-Durodola, S. (2003b). Vocabulary enrichment program for third and fourth grade African American students: Description, implementation, and impact. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 419–441). Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Davidson, K., Harm, M., & Griffin, J. (2004). Variability in text features in six grade 1 basal reading programs. Scientific Studies in Reading, 8(2), 167–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Petscher, Y., Lefsky, E., & Toste, J. (2010). Reading first in Florida: Five years of improvement. Journal of Research on Literacy, 42, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B., Petscher, Y., & Bishop, M. D. (2012). The incremental variance of morphological knowledge to reading comprehension in grades 3–10 beyond prior reading comprehension, spelling, and text reading efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 792–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamse, B., Jacob, R., Horst, M., Boulay, B., & Unlu, F. (2008). Reading First impact study final report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation & Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences. (U.S. Department of Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E., & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, B., Wolf, A., Bell, S., Turner, H., & Finney, P. (2011). Effectiveness of a program to accelerate vocabulary development in kindergarten (VOCAB): First grade follow-up impact report and exploratory analyses of kindergarten impacts (NCEE 2012-4009). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation & Regional Assistance, IES. (U.S. Department of Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. F., Cooke, C. L., & Laberge, M. J. (1983). Effects of previewing short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403–423. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, J., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 21, 261–280. doi:10.1080/10573560590949377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1999). The social world of children learning to talk. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, R., & Greenleaf, C. L. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L., Meier, J., & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(1), 17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences. (U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.).

  • Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). A synthesis of research on graphic organizers and their effect on reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998a). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Hughes, S. T., Schumm, J. S., & Elbaum, B. (1998b). Outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010) Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever, R., & Sénéchal, M. (2011). Discussing stories: On how dialogic reading intervention improves kindergartners’ oral narrative construction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., & Vye, N. J. (1990). Reciprocal teaching improves standardized reading-comprehension performance in poor comprehenders. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Bakken, J. P., & Whedon, C. (1996a). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 10, Part B, pp. 201–223). Greenwich: JAI Press. doi:10.1177/0741932509355988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 148–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., Hall, M. W., & Resnick, L. (2002). Accountable talk: Classroom conversation that works (3 CD-ROM set). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009) Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740–764. doi:10.1037/a0015576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary process. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). National assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Supplemental information for appendix a of the common core standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/E0813_Appendix_A_New_Research_on_Text_Complexity.pdf.

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. In C. E. Snow, M. S. Burns, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Committee on the prevention of reading difficulties in young children, committee on behavioral and social science and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., Perfetti, C., Liben, D., Liben, M. (2012). Measures of text difficulty: Testing their predictive value for grade levels and student performance. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2012/Measures%20ofText%20Difficulty_final.2012.pdf.

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Barros, R. (2012). The development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0027412.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. E., White, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. E., Swanson, H. L., & Geraghty, C. (2010). Improvement in reading rate under independent and difficult text levels: Influences on word and comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2011-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470757642.ch13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 415–432). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, D., Anderson, K., & Sweeney, J. (2010). Early interventions for reading difficulties: The interactive strategies approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. A., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Asselin, M. (2003). Vocabulary instruction throughout the day in twenty-three Canadian upper-elementary classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, D., Kame’enui, E., Harn, B., Coyne, M., Edwards, L., & Thomas, C. (2007). The effects of instructional emphasis and specificity on early reading and vocabulary development of kindergarten children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 331–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, D., Coyne, M., Kwok, O., McDonagh, S., Harn, B., & Kame-ennui, E. (2008). Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 158–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Porche, M. V., Tabors, P., & Harris, S. (2007). Is literacy enough? Pathways to academic success for adolescents. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (2006). The effects of vocabulary instruction. In K. A. D. Stahl & M. C. McKenna (Eds.), Reading research at work: Foundations of effective practice (pp. 226–261). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanback, M. (1992). Syllable and rime patterns for teaching reading: Analysis of a frequency-based vocabulary of 17,602 words. Annals of Dyslexia, 42(1), 196–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1999). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Hsieh, C. (2009). Reading disabilities in adults: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1362–1390. doi:10.3102/0034654309350931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E. A., Wanzek, J., McCulley, L., Stillman-Spisak, S., Vaughn, S., Summon, D., Fogarty, M., & Hairrell, A. (in press). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2005). The CIERA school change framework: An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 40–69. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Houston, D. D., Rissman, L. M., Decker, S. M., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Lesaux, N. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth: RMC Corporation, Center on Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twyman, T., McCleery, J., & Tindal, G. (2006). Using concepts to frame history content. Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Lutz Klauda, S., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in Schools, 45(5), 432–445. doi:10.1002/pits.20307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. P., Brooke, S., Lauer, K., Hall, K., & Pollini, S. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Whatʼs the pronunciation for -OUGH and the spelling for/u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback inconsistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, the US Department of Education, through sub awards to two grants: (1) a sub award to Florida State University (FSU) from Grant R305F100005 to the Educational Testing Service as part of the Reading for Understanding Initiative and (2) a sub award to FSU from Grant R305F100013 to the University of Texas at Austin. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute, the US Department of Education, the Educational Testing Service, The University of Texas at Austin, or The Florida State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, 2010 Levy Ave., Ste. 100, 32310, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Barbara R. Foorman PhD & Jeanne Wanzek PhD

Authors
  1. Barbara R. Foorman PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeanne Wanzek PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara R. Foorman PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Santa Barbara Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, Santa Barbara, California, USA

    Shane R. Jimerson

  2. University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA

    Matthew K. Burns

  3. Education Research & Consulting, Inc., FAIRHOPE, Alabama, USA

    Amanda M. VanDerHeyden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foorman, B., Wanzek, J. (2016). Classroom Reading Instruction for All Students. In: Jimerson, S., Burns, M., VanDerHeyden, A. (eds) Handbook of Response to Intervention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation