Skip to main content

Odor Biometrics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Biometrics

Synonyms

Osmology; Scent identification line-ups

Definition

Human odor can be differentiated among individuals and can therefore be seen as a biometric that can be used to identify this person. Dogs have been trained to identify objects held by a specific person for forensic purposes from the beginning of the twentieth century. Advancing technology has made it possible to identify humans based on headspace analysis of objects they have handled, opening the route to the use of odor as a biometric.

Introduction

From the early twentieth century, dogs have been used to find and identify humans based on their odor. This has originated from the capacity of dogs to follow the track of a person, either by following the odor the person left directly on the ground that the dog needed to follow quite closely (“tracking”) or by following a broader odor trail that the dogs could follow at some distance (“trailing”). Some dogs were very “track-sure”: i.e., they continued to follow the specific...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Schoon, R. Haak, K-9 Suspect Discrimination: Training and Practicing Scent Identification Line-Ups (Detselig, Calgery, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.A.A. Schoon, Scent identification line-up by dogs (Canis Familiaris): experimental design and forensic application. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 49, 257–267 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G.A.A. Schoon, J.C. De Bruin, The ability of dogs to recognize and cross-match human odours. Forensic Sci. Int. 69, 111–118 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R.H. Settle, B.A. Sommerville, J. McCormick, D.M. Broom, Human scent matching using specially trained dogs. Anim. Behav. 48(6), 1443–1448 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P.G. Hepper, The discrimination of human body odour by the dog. Perception 17(4), 549–554 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R.S. Ramotowski, Comparison of latent print residue, in Advances in Fingerprint Technology, 2nd edn., ed. by H.C. Lee, R.E. Gaensslen (CRC, Boca Raton, 2001), pp. 63–104

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.B. Shelley, H.J. Hurley Jr., A.C. Nichols, Axillary odor: experimental study of the role of bacteria, apocrine sweat and deodorants. AMA Arch. Derm. Syphilol. 68(4), 430–446 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B.A. Sommerville, R.H. Settle, F.M. Darling, D.M. Broom, The use of trained dogs to discriminate human scent. Anim. Behav. 46, 189–190 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A.M. Curran, S.I. Rabin, P.A. Prada, K.G. Furton, Comparison of the volatile organic compounds present in human odor using SPME-GC/MS. J. Chem. Ecol. 31(7), 1607–1619 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G.A.A. Schoon, The effect of the ageing of crime scene objects on the results of scent identification line-ups using trained dogs. Forensic Sci. Int. 147, 43–47 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. U.R. Bernier, M.M. Booth, R.A. Yost, Analysis of human skin emanations by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 1. Thermal desorption of attractants for the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti) from handled glass beads. Anal. Chem. 71(1), 1–7 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A.M. Curran, C.R. Ramirez, A.A. Schoon, K.G. Furton, The frequency of occurrence and discriminatory power of compounds found in human scent across a population determined by SPME-GC/MS. J. Chromatogr. B 846, 86–97 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Eggert, D. Luszyk, K. Haberkorn, B. Wobst, O. Vostrowsky, E. Eckhard Westphal, H.J. Bestmann, W. Müller-Ruchholtz, R. Ferstl, The major histocompatibility complex and the chemosensory signalling of individuality in humans. Genetica 104, 265–273 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Willse, A.M. Belcher, G. Preti, J.H. Wahl, M. Thresher, P. Yang, K. Yamazaki, G.K. Beauchamp, Identification of major histocompatibility complex-regulated body odorants by statistical analysis of a comparative gas chromatography/mass spectrometry experiment. Anal. Chem. 77, 2348–2361 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Wójcikiewicz, Dog scent lineup as scientific evidence. Probl. Forensic Sci. 41, 141–149 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. LJN: AW0980, 11th Apr 2006, Helderse Taximoord

    Google Scholar 

  17. California v. Ryan Willis, MA020235, June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  18. California v. Salcido, Cal. App. 2nd, GA052057 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schoon, A.A., Curran, A.M., Furton, K.G. (2015). Odor Biometrics. In: Li, S.Z., Jain, A.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7488-4_279

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics