Skip to main content

Ultrasonic Flaw Classification Using a Quasi-Pulse-Echo Technique

  • Chapter
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation

Part of the book series: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering ((RPQN,volume 28))

  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

In solving ultrasonic flaw characterization problems, flaw type information is often needed in order to pursue succeeding tasks such as flaw sizing. In a typical inspection, the interaction of the incident ultrasonic pulse with the flaw results in a series of signal trains. A variety of signal features are extracted from these flaw signals and then used as the basis for the classification process. This classification process is made difficult by the large number of possible scattered waves. For example, typical ultrasonic signals from a planar crack-like defect consist of reflected responses, surface traveling waves, edge diffracted waves and head wave components. For a volumetric void-like defect, the returned signal pattern similarly contains reflected waves of the same mode as well as mode-converted reflections and “creeping” waves. However, in pulse-echo testing a fundamental difference exists between a crack-like flaw and a volumetric flaw that can be used for classification purposes. This difference is reflected in the fact that a significant mode-converted diffracted wave component can exist for a crack-like defect (Fig. 1(a)) which does not exist in pulse-echo testing for a volumetric defect (Fig.1(b)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. J. Gruber. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 1, p. 263–276, (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kh. Vopilkin. Soviet Journal of NDT, 21, p. 143–154 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Gebhardt and F. Walte. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation Vol 8A, (Eds. D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti) Plenum Press, New York, p. 591–598 (1989).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. C.-P. Chiou and L. W. Schmerr. Ultrasonics, 29, p. 471–481 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. C. Mow and L. J. Mente. Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME, 30, p. 598–604 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. K. Chapman. CEGB Report NW/SSD/RR/145/81, Nuclear Electric, NDT Applications Centre, Manchester, UK (December 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiou, CP., Schmerr, L.W. (1992). Ultrasonic Flaw Classification Using a Quasi-Pulse-Echo Technique. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3344-3_108

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3344-3_108

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6474-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3344-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics