Skip to main content

Pricing of Energy Contracts: From Replication Pricing to Swing Options

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Risk Management in Energy Production and Trading

Abstract

The principle of replication or superhedging is widely used for valuating financial contracts, in particular, derivatives. In the special situation of energy markets, this principle is not quite appropriate and might lead to unrealistic high prices, when complete hedging is not possible, or to unrealistic low prices, when own production is involved. Therefore we compare it to further valuation strategies: acceptability pricing weakens the requirement of almost sure replication and indifference pricing accounts for the opportunity costs of producing for a considered contract. Finally, we describe a game-theoretic approach for valuating flexible contracts (swing options), which is based on bi-level optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Negative liabilities are profits.

  2. 2.

    We denote by x ⋅ S the inner product of the vectors x and S.

  3. 3.

    The ask-bid interval has to be clearly distinguished to the bid-ask spread (bid-price \(<\) ask-price) appearing in stock exchanges, when no deal can be made.

References

  1. Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Financ 9:203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbieri A, Garman M (2002) Understanding the valuation of swing contracts. Energy Power Risk Manag, FEA, Tech. Rep.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broussev N, Pflug G (2009) Electricity swing options: behavioral models and pricing. Eur J Oper Res 197(39):1041–1050

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bühlmann H (1972) Mathematical risk theory. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 172. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carmona R (2009) Indifference pricing: theory and applications. Princeton series in financial engineering. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dempe S (1992) A necessary and a sufficient optimality condition for bilevel programming problems. Optimization 25:341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dempe S (2002) Foundations of bilevel programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  8. Föllmer H, Leukert P (1999) Quantile hedging. Financ Stoch 3:251–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frauendorfer K, Güssow J, Haarbrücker G, Kuhn D (2005) Stochastische optimierung im energiehandel: entscheidungsunterstützung und bewertung für das portfoliomanagement. Zeitschrift für Energie, Markt, Wettbewerb 1:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haarbrücker G, Kuhn D (2009) Valuation of electricity swing options by multistage stochastic programming. Automatica 45:889–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaminski V, Gibner S (1995) Exotic options. In: Kaminski V (ed) Managing energy price risk. Risk Publications, London, pp 117–148

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kovacevic R, Paraschiv F (2012) Medium-term planning for thermal electricity production, OR Spectrum, Doi:10.1007/500291-013-0340-9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kovacevic RM, Pflug GC (2013) Electricity swing option pricing by stochastic bilevel optimization: a survey and new approaches, available ref www.speps.org

  14. McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management - concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton series in finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  15. Outrata J (1993) Necessary optimality conditions for Stackelberg problems. J Optim 76:305–320

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pennanen T (2012) Introduction to convex optimization in financial markets. Math Program 134:157–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pflug G, Römisch W (2007) Modeling, measuring and managing risk. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Pilipović D (2007) Energy risk: valuing and managing energy derivatives, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Professionalition, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pilipović D, Wengler J (1998) Getting into the swing. Energy Power Risk Manag 2:22–24

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rockafellar R (1974) Conjugate duality and optimization. In: CBMS-NSF regional conference series in applied mathematics, vol 16. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Ch. Pflug .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kovacevic, R.M., Pflug, G.C. (2013). Pricing of Energy Contracts: From Replication Pricing to Swing Options. In: Kovacevic, R., Pflug, G., Vespucci, M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Management in Energy Production and Trading. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 199. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9035-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics