Abstract
A fundamental challenge in modeling the brain is how to deal with the enormous complexity that exists at multiple spatial and temporal scales. This complexity is already encountered at the level of the single neuron, but it becomes still more apparent, and daunting, when creating models at the level of neuronal networks, a term that generally describes models on the scale of tens to millions of connected neurons. Complexity occurs across scales. Rapid interneuronal communication manifests on scales of microns and milliseconds, while learning across cortex may take place on scales of centimeters and on temporal scales of hours, days, and years. It is impossible for a single model to include all complexity at all levels, so decisions must be made as to what is to be left out of a given model. Part of the simplification process involves model embedding while crossing multiple scales (multiscale modeling). This chapter describes that the basic model of the neuron that is used in networks is greatly simplified from the complex models that we developed in the prior chapter. Multiple other simplifications are also made: using only a restricted number of cell types (excitatory and inhibitory; fast and slow) instead of the many types that exist; leaving out large parts of the neuron function – for example, the axon; and assuming that the network is being driven rather than creating activity through its own mechanisms.
Once a sufficiently simplified network model is obtained, a variety of mathematical, data-mining, and visualization tools can be used to investigate its properties. Oscillations in a network can be investigated by frequency spectra. Activity synchrony can be measured by looking at various correlation tools. The structure of a network can be analyzed through graph theory, by considering properties as path length, centrality, and clustering. Communication in a network can be analyzed through information theory, which quantifies the extent to which neurons influence and transfer information to other neurons.
Much computer modeling involves exploration and experimentation on the simulations. Through in silico experimentation, the researcher refines and studies these complex models. Different researchers make very different choices about which simplifications are justified and how best to analyze and study their networks. Therefore, a large variety of models exist. There is no single best way to do network modeling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsFurther Reading
Anderson JA (ed) (1995) An introduction to neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge
Brunel N (2000) Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. J Comput Neurosci 8:183–208
Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG (1991) Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City
Izhikevich EM (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 14(6):1569–1572
Izhikevich EM (2010) Dynamical systems in neuroscience: the geometry of excitability and bursting. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Koch C (2004) The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Roberts and Company Publishers, Englewood, CO
Koch C, Segev I (1998) Methods in neuronal modeling: from synapse to networks, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Lytton WW (2002) From computer to brain. Springer, New York
Neymotin SA, Lee HY, Park EH, Fenton AA, Lytton WW (2011a) Emergence of physiological oscillation frequencies in a computer model of neocortex. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 5:19
Neymotin SA, Lazarewicz MT, Sherif M, Contreras D, Finkel LH, Lytton WW (2011b) Ketamine disrupts theta modulation of gamma in a computer model of hippocampus. J Neurosci 31(32):11733–11743
O’Reilly R, Munakata Y, McClelland JL (2000) Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Sporns O (2010) Networks of the brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Tufte ER (1990) Envisioning information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Glossary
- Dynamics
-
The study of how a process changes over time.
- ING
-
Interneuron network gamma – gamma oscillations generated by the activity of interneurons.
- PING
-
Pyramidal interneuron network gamma – gamma oscillations generated by the interactions of pyramidal and inhibitory neurons.
- Raster plot
-
Plot showing spiking of cells – vertical axis is cell identity and horizontal axis is time.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Neymotin, S.A., Mathew, A., Kerr, C.C., Lytton, W.W. (2013). Computational Neuroscience of Neuronal Networks. In: Pfaff, D.W. (eds) Neuroscience in the 21st Century. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1997-6_87
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1997-6_87
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1996-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1997-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences