Abstract
In 1934, the Crossett Experimental Forest (CEF) opened to develop good forestry practices for the poorly stocked pine-hardwood stands that arose following the high-grading of the virgin forest. One CEF demonstration area has had no active silviculture other than fire protection since 1937; this 32.4-ha stand is now the Russell R. Reynolds Research Natural Area (Reynolds RNA). Periodic inventories of this tract provide a unique account of long-term stand development under minimal anthropogenic disturbance. For instance, successional change has been characterized by the slow conversion from pines to hardwoods. Gradually, as the dominant pines die, they are replaced by increasingly shade-tolerant hardwoods, resulting in a dense understory and midstory. Without concurrent fire to help prepare the seedbed, even a relatively severe bark beetle infestation in 1993–1994 failed to sufficiently disturb the site and permit the establishment of a new pine cohort. In addition to lessons learned on succession in this cover type, research associated with the Reynolds RNA has also helped develop old-growth restoration strategies, the ecological role of large dead wood in southern pine forests, the deleterious effect of dense midstory hardwoods on red-cockaded woodpecker habitat, the value of old forests in modeling tree allometry and carbon sequestration, and the unexpected benefits of preserving unique landscape features for future study. Clearly, the Reynolds RNA has demonstrated that there are opportunities to learn from passive stand management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen HL, Fox TR, Campbell RG (2005) What is ahead for intensive pine plantation silviculture in the South? South J Appl For 29(2):62–69
Anonymous (1981) “Dear Professor Chapman”: letters from Yale forestry graduates, 1910–1912. J For Hist 25(4):197–208
Aquilani SM (2006) Bird communities in silvicultural fragments of Holly Springs National Forest, Mississippi. Southeast Nat 5(1):135–148
Baker JB, Bishop LM (1986) Crossett demonstration forest guide. General Report, R8-GR 6, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, 55 p
Barrett LI (1928) Fire damage done to a mature loblolly pine stand. Savannah Wkly Nav Store Rev J Trade 38(18):11
Braccia A, Batzer DP (2001) Invertebrates associated with woody debris in a southeastern U.S. forest floodplain wetland. Wetlands 21(1):18–31
Bragg DC (2004a) Composition, structure, and dynamics of a pine-hardwood old-growth remnant in southern Arkansas. J Torrey Bot Soc 131(4):320–336
Bragg DC (2004b) A prescription for old-growth-like characteristics in southern pines. In: Shepperd WD, Eskew LD (comps.) Silviculture in special places: proceedings of the 2003 National Silviculture Workshop. RMRS-P-34, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, pp 80–92
Bragg DC (2008a) The prominence of pine in the Upper West Gulf Coastal Plain during historical times. In: Hardy LM (ed) Freeman and Custis Red River Expedition of 1806: two hundred years later. Bulletin of the Museum of Life Sciences Number 14, Louisiana State University-Shreveport, Shreveport, pp 29–54
Bragg DC (2008b) A comparison of pine height models for the Crossett Experimental Forest. J Ark Acad Sci 62:24–31
Bragg DC, Heitzman E (2009) Composition, structure, and dynamics of a mature, unmanaged, pine-dominated old field stand in southeastern Arkansas. Southeast Nat 8(3):445–470
Bragg DC, Shelton MG (2011) Lessons from 72 years of monitoring a once-cut pine-hardwood stand on the Crossett Experimental Forest, Arkansas, U.S.A. For Ecol Manage 261:911–922
Bragg DC, Shelton MG, Guldin JM (2008) Restoring old-growth southern pine ecosystems: strategic lessons from long-term silvicultural research. In: Deal RL (ed) Integrated restoration of forest ecosystems to achieve multiresource benefits: proceedings of the 2007 National Silviculture Workshop. General Technical Report, PNW-733, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest Experiment Station, Corvallis, pp 211–224
Bruner EM (1930) Forestry and forest fires in Arkansas. University of Arkansas Agricultural Extension Service Extension Circular 281, 30 p
Cain MD, Hestir JL, Shelton MG (n.d.) Establishment record for the R.R. Reynolds Research Natural Area within the Ouachita National Forest, Ashley County, Arkansas. Unpublished document on file at Monticello, AR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 13 p
Cain MD, Shelton MG (1995) Thirty-eight years of autogenic, woody understory dynamics in a mature, temperate pine-oak forest. Can J For Res 25:1997–2009
Cain MD, Shelton MG (1996) The R.R. Reynolds Research Natural Area in southeastern Arkansas: a 56-year case study in pine-hardwood overstory sustainability. J Sustain For 3(4):59–73
Cain MD, Shelton MG (2000) Survival and growth of Pinus echinata and Quercus seedlings in response to simulated summer and winter prescribed burns. Can J For Res 30(11):1830–1836
Cain MD (1987) Survival patterns of understory woody species in a pine-hardwood forest during 28 years without timber management. In: Hay RL, Woods FW, DeSelm H (eds) Proceedings of the sixth central hardwood forest conference. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, pp 141–147
Chapman HH (1912) A method of investigating yields per acre in many-aged stands. For Q 10:458–469
Chapman HH (1913) Prolonging the cut of southern pine. I. Possibilities of a second cut. Yale University Forestry School Bulletin 2:1–22
Chapman HH (1916) Organization of state forest protective systems. In: Proceedings of the Southern Forestry Congress. Seeman Printery, Durham, pp 81–97
Chapman HH (1932) Is the longleaf type a climax? Ecology 13(4):328–334
Chapman HH (1942) Management of loblolly pine in the pine-hardwood region in Arkansas and in Louisiana west of the Mississippi River. Forestry School Bulletin 49. Yale University, New Haven, 150 p
Chapman HH (1952) The place of fire in the ecology of pines. Bartonia 26:39–44
Conner RC, Hartsell AJ (2002) Forest area and conditions. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. General Technical Report SRS-53, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, pp 357–402
Conner RN, O’Halloran KA (1987) Cavity-tree selection by red-cockaded woodpeckers as related to growth dynamics of southern pines. Wilson Bull 99(3):398–412
Conner RN, Rudolph DC, Saenz D, Johnson RH (2004a) The red-cockaded woodpecker cavity tree: a very special pine. In: Costa R, Daniels SJ (eds) Red-cockaded woodpeckers: road to recovery. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, pp 407–411
Conner RN, Saenz D, Rudolph DC, Schaefer RR (2004b) Extent of Phellinus pini decay in loblolly pines and red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees in eastern Texas. In: Cripps CL (ed) Fungi in forest ecosystems: systematics, diversity, and ecology. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, pp 315–321
Darling OH, Bragg DC (2008) The early mills, railroads, and logging camps of the Crossett Lumber Company. Ark Hist Q 67(2):107–140
Della-Bianca L (1983) Sixty years of stand development in a southern Appalachian cove-hardwood stand. For Ecol Manage 5:229–241
Devall MS, Ramp PF (1992) U.S. Forest Service Research Natural Areas and protection of old growth in the South. Nat Areas J 12:75–85
Eldredge IF (1952) Southern forests, then and now. J For 50(5):182–185
Fan Z, Shifley SR, Spetich MA, Thompson FR, Larsen DR (2005) Abundance and size distribution of cavity trees in second-growth and old-growth Central Hardwood forests. North J Appl For 22(3):162–169
Fitzpatrick JW, Lammertink M, Luneau MD, Gallagher TW, Harrison BR, Sparling GM, Rosenberg KV, Rohrbaugh RW, Swarthout ECH, Wrege PH, Swarthout SB, Dantzker MS, Charif RA, Barksdale TR, Remsen JV, Simon SD, Zollner D (2005) Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) persists in continental North America. Science 308:1460–1462
Forbes RD (1923) Research in forest fires. In: Proceedings of the fifth Southern Forestry Congress. A.W. Hyatt, Ltd, New Orleans, pp 41–46
Fountain MS, Sweeney JM (1987) Ecological assessment of the Lake Winona Research Natural Area. Research Paper SO-235, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, 14 p
Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2004) The evolution of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. In: Rauscher HM, Johnson K (eds) Southern forest science: past, present, and future. General Technical Report SRS-75, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, pp 63–82
Garren KH (1941) Fire wounds on loblolly pine and their relation to decay and cull. J For 39(1):16–22
Glitzenstein JS, Harcombe PA, Streng DR (1986) Disturbance, succession, and maintenance of species diversity in an east Texas forest. Ecol Monogr 56(3):243–258
Guldin JM (2005) Use of prescribed fire in restoration of old-growth loblolly-shortleaf pine stands on the Upper West Gulf Coastal Plain. Unpublished study plan for FS-SRS-4106-101 on file at Monticello, AR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 15 p
Guldin JM, Baker JB (1985) Dynamics and development of a once-cutover, unmanaged loblolly pine stand in southeastern Arkansas. In: Shoulders E (ed) Proceedings of the third biennial southern silvicultural research conference. General Technical Report SO-54, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, pp 198–202
Hall WL (1945) Is pine coming or going in south Arkansas? J For 43:634–637
Halverson HG, Guldin JM (1995) Effects of a severe ice storm on mature loblolly pine stands in north Mississippi. In: Edwards MB (comp) Proceedings of the eighth biennial southern silvicultural research conference. General Technical Report SRS-1, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, pp 147–153
Hemond HF, Niering WA, Goodwin RH (1983) Two decades of vegetation change in the Connecticut Arboretum Natural Area. Bull Torrey Bot Club 110:184–194
Heyward F (1958) History of industrial forestry in the South. Col. William B. Greeley lectures in industrial forestry number 2. University of Washington College of Forestry, Seattle, 50 p
Hicks RR Jr (1980) Climate, site, and stand factors. In: Thatcher RC, Searcy JC, Coster JE, Hertel GO (eds) The southern pine beetle. Technical Bulletin, 1631. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 55–68
Huston M, Smith T (1987) Plant succession: life history and competition. Am Nat 130:168–198
Iverson LR, Schwartz MK, Prasad AM (2004) How fast and far might tree species migrate in the eastern United States due to climate change? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:209–219
Jones SM, Van Lear DH, Cox SK (1981) Composition and density-diameter pattern of an old-growth forest stand of the Boiling Springs Natural Area, South Carolina. Bull Torr Bot Club 108:347–353
Ku TT, Sweeney JM, Shelburne VB (1981) Southern Arkansas. In: Coster JE, Searcy JL (eds) Site, stand, and host characteristics of southern pine beetle infestations. Technical Bulletin, No. 1612, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, pp 16–22
Lemon PC (1945) Wood as a substratum for perennial plants in the Southeast. Am Midl Nat 34(3):744–749
McMinn JW, Crossley DA Jr (eds) (1996) Proceedings of the workshop on coarse woody debris in southern forests: effects on biodiversity. General Technical Report SE-94, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, 146 p
Munger TT (1930) Ecological aspects of the transition from old forests to new. Science 72(1866):327–332
Northern Research Station (2010) About research natural areas. USDA Forest Service online statement. http://nrs.fs.fed.us/rna/about/.Accessed 30 Nov 2010
Quarterman E, Keever C (1962) Southern mixed hardwood forest: climax in the southeastern coastal plain, USA. Ecol Monogr 32:167–185
Radtke PJ, Amateis RL, Prisley SP, Copenheaver CA, Chojnacky DC, Pittman JR, Burkhart HE (2009) Modeling production and decay of coarse woody debris in loblolly pine plantations. For Ecol Manage 257:790–799
Reynolds RR (1974) Selective timber management—its role. For Farmer 33(5):6–7, 12
Reynolds RR (1980) The Crossett Story: the beginnings of forestry in southern Arkansas and northern Louisiana. General Technical Report SO-32, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, 40 p
Rousseau R, Kaczmarek D, Martin J (2005) A review of the biological, social, and regulatory constraints to intensive plantation culture. South J Appl For 29(2):105–109
Saenz D, Conner RN, Rudolph DC, Engstrom RT (2001) Is a “hands-off” approach appropriate for red-cockaded woodpecker conservation in twenty-first-century landscapes? Wildl Soc Bull 29(3):956–966
Schultz RP (1999) Loblolly—the pine for the twenty-first century. New For 17:71–88
Seifert CS, Cox RT, Foti TL, Forman SL, Wasklewicz TA, McColgan AT (2009) Relict nebkhas (pimple mounds) record late Holocene megadroughts in the forested region of South-Central United States. Quat Res 71(3):329–339
Shea JP (1940) Our pappies burned the woods. Am For 46(4):159–162, 174
Shelton MG (2007) Status of the litterfall, forest floor, and soils of the Good Farm Forestry Forty Demonstration Area and the R.R. Reynolds Research Natural Area on the Crossett Experimental Forest. Unpublished progress report for study FS-SRS-4106-66 on file at Monticello, AR, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 47 p
Shelton MG, Cain MD (1999) Structure and short-term dynamics of the tree component of a mature pine-hardwood forest in southeastern Arkansas. J Torr Bot Soc 126(1):32–48
Shelton MG, Cain MD (2000) Regenerating uneven-aged stands of loblolly and shortleaf pines: the current state of knowledge. For Ecol Manage 129(1–3):177–193
Smith KL (1986) Sawmill: the story of cutting the last great virgin forest east of the Rockies. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, 246 p
Switzer GL, Shelton MG, Nelson LE (1979) Successional development of the forest floor and soil surface on upland sites of the East Gulf Coastal Plain. Ecology 60:1162–1171
Tanner JT (1942) The ivory-billed woodpecker. Research report 1, National Audubon Society, New York, NY, 111 p
Thatcher RC, Searcy JL, Coster JE, Hertel GD (eds) (1980) The southern pine beetle. Science and Education Administration, Technical Bulletin 1631, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, 266 p
USDA Forest Service (1993) Healthy forests for America’s future. Miscellaneous publication 1513. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, 58 p
USDA Forest Service (2005) Record of decision: final environmental impact statement; revised land resource management plan. Ouachita National Forest, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Management Bulletin R8-MB 124D, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, 19 p
Wahlenberg WG (1960) Loblolly pine. Duke University School of Forestry, Durham, 603 p
Waldron JD, Lafon CW, Carlson RN, Cairns DM, Tchakerian MD, Bist A, Klepzig KD (2007) Simulating the impacts of southern pine beetles and fire on the dynamics of xerophytic pine landscapes in the southern Appalachians. Appl Veg Sci 10:53–64
Wakeley PC (1964) A biassed history of the Southern Forest Experiment Station through fiscal year 1933. Unpublished document. http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/3261. Accessed 30 April 2014
White ZW (1984) Loblolly pine, with emphasis on its history. In: Karr BL, Baker JB, Monaghan T (eds) Proceedings of the Symposium on the Loblolly Pine Ecosystem (West Region). Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service, Mississippi State, pp 3–16
Woodall CW, Oswalt CM, Westfall JA, Perry CH, Nelson MD, Finley AO (2009) An indicator of tree migration in forests of the eastern United States. For Ecol Manage 257(5):1434–1444
Zhang M (2000) Quantification of snags and downed wood in the R.R. Reynolds Research Natural Area and Good Forty Demonstration Area in southeastern Arkansas. M.S. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Monticello, AR, 47 p
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the following people for their contributions to this chapter over the years—Michael Cain, Mike Chain, Jim Guldin, Kirby Sneed, and Bruce Walsh (all of the USDA Forest Service). In particular, we would like to give recognition to Russ Reynolds and other past station staff that helped to establish the long-term studies on the CEF. Without their vision, this work would not be possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bragg, D., Shelton, M. (2014). The Value of Old Forests: Lessons from the Reynolds Research Natural Area. In: Hayes, D., Stout, S., Crawford, R., Hoover, A. (eds) USDA Forest Service Experimental Forests and Ranges. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1818-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1818-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1817-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1818-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)