Skip to main content

Reductionism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The construct of reductionism has taken many forms, but a common feature is that higher level or otherwise complex systems can be understood in terms of (reduced to), the properties of the lower-level elements of which they are comprised. Reductionism as a philosophical doctrine could be considered in an abstract, metaphysical sense, apart from any pragmatic reference. In science, however, it is an important perspective on the relations between domains (physical vs. mental) or levels of organization (e.g., molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, organ system, individual organism, social systems). Consequently, it can impact broadly on issues such as how we approach science and what constitutes a scientific explanation. The issue becomes especially acute for multi-level interdisciplinary approaches in the neurosciences, where the goal is to integrate information across widely disparate levels of organization and function, and associated levels of observation and analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Psychobiology and social psychology: Past, present and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1992). Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain: Doctrine of multilevel analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1019–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multi-level integrative analyses of human behavior: The complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 829–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M., & Churchland, P. S. (1998). On the Contrary: Critical Essays 1987–1997. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S. (2008). The impact of neuroscience on philosophy. Neuron, 60, 409–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C., Koppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F. (1997). Explaining emergence: Towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28, 83–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1963). Mental events and the brain. Journal of Philosophy, 40, 295–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, B., Liu, Y., Cascio, C., Wang, Z., & Insel, T. R. (2000). Dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens are important for social attachment in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behavioral Neuroscience, 114, 173–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, A. (1995). The self-aware universe. Los Angeles: Tarcher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. R. (1997). A neurobiological basis of social attachment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 726–735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, P. O., Meaney, M. J., & Szyf, M. (2008). Diet and the epigenetic (re)programming of phenotypic differences in behavior. Brain Research, 1237, 12–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene x environment interactions. Child Development, 81, 41–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N., Ellis, GFR., & O’Connor, T. (2009). Downward Causation and the Neurobiology of Free Will. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (2008). Genes and causation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366, 3001–3015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2005). The metaphysics of emergence. Noûs, 39, 658–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. E., & Young, L. J. (2009). Oxytocin and the neural mechanisms regulating social cognition and affiliative behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30, 534–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T. R. (1991). A personal view of the future of psychology departments. American Psychologist, 46, 975–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary G. Berntson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berntson, G.G., Cacioppo, J.T. (2012). Reductionism. In: L'Abate, L. (eds) Paradigms in Theory Construction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics