Skip to main content

Nondestructive Submicron Dimensional Metrology Using the Scanning Electron Microscope

  • Conference paper
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation

Part of the book series: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation ((RPQN,volume 6 A))

Abstract

The evolution of integrated circuit dimensions into the submicron region for the Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) and Very High Speed Integrated Circuits (VHSIC) programs necessitates inspection techniques with a resolution exceeding that of the optical microscope. Inspection using scanning electron microscopes (SEM), operated in the low accelerating voltage mode, is becoming common place in the on-line fabrication of these submicron devices due to the high spatial resolution and greater depth of field afforded by these instruments. Use of the SEM is necessitated by the desire of many processing facilities which presently work at a 10% process control level to implement process control of 5% or better. This means that the process precision goal is now (or soon will be) in the nanometer range. Even though optical microscopes can be useful for critical linewidth measurement and inspection to about 0.5μm, many fabrication lines presently are integrating low-voltage scanning electron microscopes into the production sequence at chip levels of 1.25-μm geometry and below. This enables the training of operators and the acquisition and development of expertise and experience with control charts for this type of instrumentation. Advanced scanning e-beam instruments are presently being developed to facilitate this work and to do automated inspection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. J. Keery, K. O. Leedy and K. F. Galloway, “Electron beam effects on microelectronic devices”, SEM/1976/IV IITRI Research Institute, Chicago, IL, 507–514 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. T. Postek, “The scanning electron microscope in the semiconductor industry”, Test and Measurement World, 54–75 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Nyyssonen and M. T. Postek, “SEM-based system for the calibration of linewidth SRM’s for the IC industry”, SPIE Proceedings, 565: 180–186 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Volbert and L. Reimer, “Advantages of two opposite Everhart-Thornley detectors in SEM”, SEM/1980/IV SEM, Inc., 1–10 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kanaya and S. Okayama, “Penetration and energy-loss theory of electrons in solid targets”, J. Phy. D. Appl. Phys. 5: 43–58 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Drescher, L. Reimer and H. Seidel, “Ruckstreukoefficient und Sekundarelektronen-Ausbeute von 10-100 ke V-electronen und Beziehungen zer Rasterelektronenmikroskopie”. Z. f. angew. Physik 29: 331–336 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Jensen, “Planar metrology”, in the SEM Microbeam Analysis 1980, David Wittry, Ed., ( San Francisco Press, 1980 ), pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Jensen and D. Swyt, “Sub-micrometer length metrology: Problems techniques and solutions”, SEM/1980/I SEM Inc., 393–406 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Seiler and D. V. Sulway, “Precision linewidth measurement using a scanning electron microscope”, SPIE Proceedings Vol. 480: 86–93 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. M. Bullis and D. Nyyssonen, “Optical linewidth measurements on photomasks and wafers”, in, VLSI Electronics: Microstructure Science Vol. 3, N. G. Einspruch, Eds., (Academic Press, NY, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. T. Postek, “Low accelerating voltage inspection and linewidth measurement in the scanning electron microscope”, SEM/1984/III Sem, Inc., 1065–1074 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Brunner and R. Schmid, “Charging effects in low-voltage SEM metrology”, SEM/1986, SEM, Inc., (in press) (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Frosien and B. Lischke, “Micrometrology with electron probes”, in Microcircuit Engineering 85, ( Academic Press, London, 1985 ), pp. 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. T. Postek, “Electron detection modes and their relation to linewidth measurement in the scanning electron microscope”, EMSA Proceedings, (in press) (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. C. Joy, “Image modeling for SEM-based metrology”, Proceeding Joint Annual Meeting EMSA/MAS, G. W. Bailey, Ed., (San Francisco, in press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. C. Joy, “Modeling secondary electron signals”, J. Microsc, (in press) (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Stein, D. H. Cummings and J. Schaper, “Calibrating microscopic linewidth measurement systems”, Semiconductor International, (1986), pp. 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Postek, M.T. (1987). Nondestructive Submicron Dimensional Metrology Using the Scanning Electron Microscope. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol 6 A. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1893-4_150

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1893-4_150

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9054-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1893-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics