Skip to main content

Abstract

The validity of a nondestructive inspection method can be measured by two quantities, the probability that a given flaw size will be detected, and the probability that background noise will give rise to a false indication of the presence of a flaw. Unfortunately, experimental determination of the probability of detection (POD) and the probability of false alarm (PFA) requires a rather extensive set of measurements to obtain statistically sound estimates. Furthermore, if one or more of the parameters that define the method, such as the scan track spacing or probe configuration, are changed, then the full set of measurements must be repeated to obtain new estimates of the POD and PFA, thus adding to the time and expense of test validation. In some situations, where one is designing an inspection for a part or flaw size that is not yet available for testing, there is no way that the validity of a proposed inspection can be evaluated beforehand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. R. Martinez and A. J. Bahr, “Statistical Detection Model for Eddy-Current Systems,” Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 3А, D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds., Plenum, New York (1984), p. 499.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. E. Beissner, “Boundary Element Model of Eddy Current Flaw Detection in Three Dimensions,” J. Appl. Phys. 60, 352 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. A. Auld, “Theoretical Characterization and Comparison of Resonant Probe Microwave Eddy Current Testing with Conventional Low Frequency Eddy Current Methods,” in “Eddy Current Characterization of Materials and Structures,” ASTM STP 722, G. Birnbaum and G. Free, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1981), p. 332.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. R. E. Beissner and M. J. Sablik, “Theory of Eddy Currents Induced by a Nonsymmetric Coil Above a Conducting Half-Space,” J. Appl. Phys. 56, 448 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. V. Dodd and W. E. Deeds, “Analytical Solutions to Eddy-Current Probe-Coil Problems,” J. Appl. Phys. 39, 2829 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beissner, R.E., Bartels, K.A., Fisher, J.L. (1988). Prediction of the Probability of Eddy Current Flaw Detection. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0979-6_107

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0979-6_107

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8275-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0979-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics