Skip to main content

Data Fusion for Chemical Process Monitoring, Control and Optimization

  • Chapter
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

On-line sensors have long played a key role in process operations. The most common use is monitoring — sensor outputs are displayed for the plant operators, who take any required corrective action. Equally important are feedback control systems, which use the sensor outputs to take automatic corrective action. As automation becomes more prevalent, sensors are seeing even wider use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. M. Wise, N. L. Ricker, D. F. Veltkamp and B. R. Kowalski, Process Control and Quality 1,41(1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Kresta, J. F. MacGregor and T. E. Marlin, Can. J. Chemical Eng. 69, 35(1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Basseville, Automatica 24, 309(1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Liebman, T. F. Edgar and L. S. Lasdon, Comp. chem. Engng. 16, 963(1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. J. Kozub and J. F. MacGregor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 1047(1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. L. Tyler and M. Morari, AIChE J. 41, 846(1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. L. Ricker, in Chemical Process Control — CPC IV, eds. Y. Arkun and H. Ray (CACHE/AIChE, New York, 1991), p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. R. Muske and J. B. Rawlings, AIChE J. 39, 262(1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. L. Darby and D. C. White, Chem. Eng. Prog., Oct., 51(1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. E. Lauks, R. J. Vasbinder, P. J. Valkenburg and C. van-Leeuwen, Comp. chem. Engng 16, 213(1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. M. Wise and N. L. Ricker, J. Chemometrics 7, 1(1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. M. Wise and N. L. Ricker, Process Control and Quality 4, 77(1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. E. P. Box and G. M. Jenkins, Time Series Analysis forecasting and control (Holden-Day, Oakland, 1976).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Ljung, System Identification Theory for the User (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. B. A. Ogunnaike and W. H. Ray, Process Dynamics, Modeling, and Control (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. L. Ricker and J. H. Lee, Computers chem. Engng 19,983(1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Bhat and T. J. McAvoy, Computers chem. Engng 14, 573(1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. G. M. Scott and W. H. Ray, J. Process Control 3, 179(1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. G. Ravi, Y. Arkun. I. L. Chien and B. A. Ogunnaike, J. Process Control. 5, 149(1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Kravaris and J. C. Kantor, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 29, 2295(1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. A. Sharaf, D. L. Illman and B. R. Kowalski, Chemometrics (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. R. Kowalski and J. Koch, plenary paper in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Wu, J. D. S. Danielson, J. B. Callis, M. T. Eaton and N. L. Ricker, Process Control and Quality, accepted, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Eaton, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Dimitratos, C. Georgakis, M. S. El-Aasser and A. Klein, Chem. Eng. Sci. 46, 3203(1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. J. Liebman, T. F. Edgar and L. S. Lasdon, Computers chem. Engng 16, 963(1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. J. Downs and E. F. Vogel, Computers chem. Engng 17, 245(1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. L. Ricker, Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Industrial Automation (Nancy, France), 625(1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. E. Gill, W. Murray, M. A. Saunders and M. H. Wright, User’s Guide for NPSOL (Version 4.0): a Fortran Package for Nonlinear Programming (Stanford Office of Technology Licensing, Palo Alto, CA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. L. Ricker, Computers chem. Engng 19, 949(1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. L. T. Biegler, I. E. Grossmann and A. W. Westerberg, Computers chem. Engng 9, 201(1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. S. Gelormino and N. L. Ricker, Int. J. Control 59, 793(1994).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. M. S. Gelormino, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ricker, N.L., Eaton, M. (1996). Data Fusion for Chemical Process Monitoring, Control and Optimization. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0383-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0383-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8027-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0383-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics