Skip to main content

History and Development of the Ureteroscope: What Does the Future Hold?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urolithiasis

Abstract

Ureteroscopy has grown from isolated incidental procedures to become a standard portion of urologic endoscopy, both for diagnosis and treatment. The development of fiber optics accelerated the development of the ureteroscope. Initially ureteroscopy was limited by the lack of irrigation, deflection, and working instruments. A major step in ureteroscopy came with distal ureteroscopy using rigid instruments. As the utility of these procedures became evident, there was a rapid development of more endoscopes and associated working instruments, specifically designed for the ureter. One of the major applications has been for urinary calculi. This has been assisted by the development of appropriate intraluminal lithotriptors. The limitations of rigid endoscopes became evident and a great deal of effort was put into developing functional, flexible ureteroscopes with channels adequate for irrigation and working instruments and deflection capabilities which increased access to the lower pole of the kidney. The main limitation is the cross-sectional size of the ureteroscope. The ureter does not accept large instruments easily. The ideal ureteroscope has yet to be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Young HH, McKay RW. Congenital valvular obstruction of the prostatic urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1929;48:509.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colladon D. On the reflections of a ray of light inside a parabolic liquid stream. Compt Rend. 1842;15:800.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hecht J. City of lights: the story of fiber optics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirschowitz BI, Curtiss LE, Peters CW, Pollard HM. Gastroenterology. 1958;35:50; Barlow DE. Fiberoptic instrument technology. In: Small animal endoscopy. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1990. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall VF. Fiber optics in urology. J Urol. 1964;91:110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takagi T, Go T, Takayasu H, Aso Y. A small-caliber fiberscope for visualization of the urinary tract, biliary tract, and spinal canal. Surgery. 1968;64:1033.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takayasu H, Aso Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol. 1974;112:176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman TM. Ureteroscopy with pediatric cystoscope in adults. Urology. 1977;9(4):394.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lyon ES, Kyker KS, Shoenberg HW. Transurethral ureteroscopy in women: a ready addition to the urological armamentarium. J Urol. 1978;119:35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyon ES, Banno JJ, Shoenberg HW. Transurethral ureteroscopy in men using juvenile cystoscopy equipment. J Urol. 1979;122:152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Das S. Transurethral ureteroscopy and stone manipulation under direct vision. J Urol. 1981;125:112.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES. Treatment of distal ureteral calculi using rigid ureteroscope. Urology. 1982;20(6):574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez-Castro EE, Martinez-Piniero JA. Transurethral ureteroscopy-a current urologicalprocedure. Arch Esp Urol. 1980;33(5):445–60.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Schoenberg HW, Lyon ES. Transurethral removal of large ureteral and renal pelvic calculi using ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Urol. 1983;130:31–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Raney AM. Electrohydraulic ureterolithotripsy-preliminary report. Urology. 1978;12:284–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Green DF, Lytton B. Early experience with direct vision electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1985;133:767.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Begun FP, Jacobs SC, Lawson T. Use of a prototype 3F electrohydraulic electrode with ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral calculus disease. J Urol. 1988;139:1188–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Willscher MK, Conway JF, Babayan RK, Morisseau P, Sant GR, Bertagnall A. Safety and efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy by ureteroscopy. J Urol. 1988;140:957–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES. Combined rigid and flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol. 1983;130:243–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bagley DH, Rittenberg MH. Intrarenal dimensions: guidelines for flexible ureteropyeloscopes. J Surg Endosc Ultrasound Interv Tech. 1987;1:119–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grasso M, Bagley DH. A 7.5F actively deflectable, flexible ureteroscope: a New device in both diagnostic and therapeutic upper urinary tract endoscopy. Urology. 1994;43(4):435–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dretler SP. An evaluation of ureteral laser lithotripsy: 225 consecutive patients. J Urol. 1990;143:267–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdel-Razzak OM, Bagley DH. The 6.9F semi-rigid ureteroscope in clinical use. Urology. 1993;41(1):45–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mulvaney WD. Attempted disintegration of calculi by ultrasonic vibrations. J Urol. 1953;70:704–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coats EC. The application of ultrasonic energy to urinary and biliary calculi. J Urol. 1956;75:856–74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rouvalis P. Electronic lithotripsy for vesical calculus with “Urat-1”. an experience of 100 cases and an experimental application of the method to stones in the upper urinary tract. Br J Urol. 1970;42:486.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Languetin JM, Jichlinski P, Farre R, van Niederhausern W. The Swiss lithoclast. J Urol. 1990;143:179A.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chew BH, Arsovska O, Lange D, et al. The Canadian StoneBreaker trial: a randomized, multicenter trial comparing the LMA StoneBreaker™ and the Swiss LithoClast® during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Endourol. 2011;25(9):1415–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mulvaney WP, Beck CW. The laser beam in urology. J Urol. 1968;99:112–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hofmann R, Hartung R, Schmidt-Kloiber H, Reichel E. First clinical experience with a Q-switched neodymium: YAG laser for urinary calculi. J Urol. 1989;141:275–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dretler SP, Watson G, Parrish JA, Murray S. Pulsed dye laser fragmentation of ureteral calculi. Initial clinical experience. J Urol. 1987;137:386–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bagley DH, Grasso M, Shalaby M, Abass El-Akkad M. Ureteral laser lithotripsy using the pulsolith. J Endourol. 1989;3(1):91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson PE, Crameens DM, Price RE. Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12:353–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Webb DR, Kocklburgh R, Johnson WF. The versapulse holmium:YAG laser in clinical urology: a pilot study. Minim Invas Ther. 1993;2:23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Erhard M, Bagley DH. Urologic applications of the holmium laser: preliminary experience. J Endourol. 1995;9(5):383–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hudson RG, Conlin MJ, Bagley DH. Ureteric access with flexible ureteroscopes: effect of the size of the ureteroscope. BJU Int. 2005;95(7):1043–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS, et al. Flexible robotic retrograde renoscopy: description of novel robotic device and preliminary laboratory experience. Urology. 2008;72(1):42–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demetrius H. Bagley M.D., FACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bagley, D.H., Healy, K.A. (2012). History and Development of the Ureteroscope: What Does the Future Hold?. In: Talati, J., Tiselius, HG., Albala, D., YE, Z. (eds) Urolithiasis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4387-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4387-1_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4383-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4387-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics