Skip to main content

Improving Multidisciplinary Team Working in Pelvic Oncology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Pelvic Cancer Surgery

Abstract

MDT working in cancer care was introduced 20 years ago and evidence of its benefits to patients and healthcare professionals is slowly emerging. Much of the work investigating MDT processes came from pelvic oncology, especially in urology. Studies have shown that a ‘systems approach’ to MDT working can reliably assess its quality, allowing for interventions that can lead to improvements in multidisciplinary teamworking and delivery of cancer care. This in turn can lead to better outcomes for patients with cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Griffith C, Turner J. United Kingdom National Health Service, Cancer Services Collaborative “Improvement Partnership”, Redesign of Cancer Services: a National Approach. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30 Suppl 1:1–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, Burns HJ, Morrison DS. Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. BMJ. 2012;344:e2718.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Junior E, Hole D, Gillis C. Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters. Br J Cancer. 1994;70(2):363–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillis CR, Hole DJ. Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ. 1996;​312(7024):145–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calman D, K. H. A policy framework for commissioning cancer services: a report by the Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales. Accessed online from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080814090336/dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4071083

  6. Undre S, Arora S, Sevdalis N. Surgical performance, human error and patient safety in urological surgery. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2009;2(1):2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent CA. Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery. World J Surg. 2007;31(7):1373–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamb B, Green JS, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Decision making in surgical oncology. Surg Oncol. 2011;20(3):163–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamb BW, Wong HW, Vincent C, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Teamwork and team performance in multidisciplinary cancer teams: development and evaluation of an observational assessment tool. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(10):849–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Mostafid H, Vincent C, Green JS. Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(13):3535–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Benn J, Vincent C, Green JS. Multidisciplinary cancer team meeting structure and treatment decisions: a prospective correlational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;20(3);715–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamb BW, Green JS, Benn J, Brown KF, Vincent CA, Sevdalis N. Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3):412–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor C, Brown K, Sevdalis N, Lamb B, Green JSA. Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure) a tool for team self-assessment of cancer MDT performance. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(13):4019–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarkar S, Arora S, Soukup T, Lamb BW, Shah S, Green JSA, et al. A multi-centre study evaluating performance of multidisciplinary teams: urology vs the top cancer killers. Eur Urol Suppl. 2014;13(1):e878–ea.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, English R, Donovan JL. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(3):457–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarkar S, Arora S, Lamb BW, Green JS, Sevdalis N, Darzi A. Case review in urology multidisciplinary team meetings: what members think of its functioning. J Clin Urol. 2014 [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin W. Lamb MBBS, MA, MRCS, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarkar, S. et al. (2015). Improving Multidisciplinary Team Working in Pelvic Oncology. In: Patel, H., Mould, T., Joseph, J., Delaney, C. (eds) Pelvic Cancer Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4257-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4258-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics