Skip to main content

Components of Adaptive Management

  • Chapter
Adaptive Environmental Management

Adaptive Management of ecosystems for production and preservation is a cyclical process with four components: learning, describing, predicting and doing. Learning involves monitoring and evaluation, describing uses models to summarise and represent systems, prediction and gaming are used to test policies and proposed actions, and the doing is done through management experiments. Successful adaptive management needs clear objectives, data and knowledge, the right participants, science skill, willing partners, and money and time. Additionally, in doing adaptive management it is necessary to drive and steer the process, keep momentum, embrace uncertainty, and beware of the danger of half measures. Adaptive management supports decisions and resource allocation, and provides a framework for action directed to changing ecosystem state while learning through and from such change. It focuses conversation and reduces arguments and finger pointing; and also reduces excuses for inaction, provides system understanding, identifies data and knowledge gaps, and sets up a time and space framework for explanation of key processes. Adaptive management won't make decisions, won't do the work or the thinking, and has scientific, social, political and economic aspects that may cause failure, but which, when understood and embraced, provide the framework for successful ecosystem improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan, C., & Curtis, A. (2005). Nipped in the bud: Why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management, 36(3), 414–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W., Bosch, O., Kilvington, M., Oliver, J., & Gilbert, M. (2001). Benefits of collaborative learning for environmental management: Applying the integrated systems for knowledge management approach to support animal pest control. Environmental Management, 27(2), 215–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 18(1), 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, H. L., & Huntsinger, L. (2006). Salal harvester local ecological knowledge, harvest practices and understory management on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, DC. Human Ecology, 34(4), 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992). The future of distributed models - model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6(3), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbal, G. A. (2001). Conceptual design of monitoring and evaluation plans for fish and wildlife in the Columbia River ecosystem. Environmental Management, 28(4), 433–453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boddicker, M., Rodriguez, J. J., & Amanzo, J. (2002). Indices for assessment and monitoring of large mammals within an adaptive management framework. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 76(1), 105–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F. (2006). Scientific requirements for ecosystem-based management in the restoration of Chesapeake Bay and Coastal Louisiana. Ecological Engineering, 26(1), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brussard, P. F., Reed, J. M., & Tracy, C. R. (1998). Ecosystem management: What is it really? Landscape and Urban Planning, 40(1–3), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, M. J. (2003). Soft systems methodology and the ecosystem approach: A system study of the Cooum River and environs in Chennai, India. Environmental Management, 31(2), 182–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, F. L., & Dunsworth, B. G. (2004). Making adaptive management for biodiversity work -the example of Weyerhaeuser in coastal British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle, 80(1), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, K. F., & Koontz, T. M. (2005). Theory into practice: Implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service. Environmental Management, 35(2), 138–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, B. S. (2006). Effectiveness of braided, gravel-bed river restoration in the Upper Waitaki Basin, New Zealand. River Research and Applications, 22(8), 905–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, D. J. (2002). Adaptive management in outdoor recreation: Serving Hispanics in southern California. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 17(3), 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, L. D., & Luckenbach, M. W. (2000). Developing success criteria and goals for evaluating oyster reef restoration: Ecological function or resource exploitation? Ecological Engineering, 15(3–4)323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contador, J. F. L. (2005). Adaptive management, monitoring, and the ecological sustainability of a thermal-polluted water ecosystem: A case in SW Spain. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 104(1–3), 19–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, S. J., White, G. C., Farris, K. L., & Zack, S. (2006). Small mammals and forest fuel reduction: National-scale responses to fire and fire surrogates. Ecological Applications, 16(5), 1717–1729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, M. A., Kneeshaw, D., Bouthillier, L., & Messier, C. (2001). Increasing partnerships between scientists and forest managers: Lessons from an ongoing interdisciplinary project in Quebec. Forestry Chronicle, 77(1), 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, J. W. (1996). Managing ecosystems for integrity: Theoretical considerations for resource and environmental managers. Society & Natural Resources, 9(5), 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio, R. M., & Johnson, F. A. (2003). Bayesian inference and decision theory - A frame-work for decision making in natural resource management. Ecological Applications, 13(2), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S. (2001). Institutions for Sustainability (No. 7), TELA: Environment, Economy and Society, Melbourne: Australian Conservation Foundation, with Environment Institute of Australia and Land and Water Australia [http://www.acfonline.org.au/uploads/res/res_tp007.pdf]

  • Dovers, S. R., & Mobbs, C. D. (1997). An alluring prospect? Ecology, and the requirements of adaptive management. In N. Klomp & I. Lunt (Eds.), Frontiers in Ecology. Building the Links. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Jones, E. S. (1997). The river valleys project: A participatory approach to integrated catchment planning and management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40(1), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESSA (1982). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management: ESSA Environmental and Social Systems Analysts Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 16(3), 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5), 437–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, J. H., Harwell, M. A., Cropper, W., Harwell, C. C., DeAngelis, D., Davis, S., et al. (2001). Ecological conceptual models: A framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability. Science of the Total Environment, 274(1–3), 231–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, L. R., Wielgus, J., & Sala, E. (2007). A decision framework for the adaptive management of an exploited species with implications for marine reserves. Conservation Biology, 21(6), 1594–1602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, A., Walkerden, G., & Scandol, J. (1999). Adaptive management of the water cycle on the urban fringe: Three Australian case studies. Conservation Ecology, 3(1), [online] Art. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., & Kompas, T. (2005). Uncertainty and the active adaptive management of marine reserves. Marine Policy, 29(5), 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, R. B., & Blöschl, G. (Eds.). (2000). Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology: Observations and Modelling (1 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Failing, L., & Higgins, P. (2006a). Adaptive management and environmental decision making: A case study application to water use planning. Ecological Economics, 58(2), 434–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Ohlson, D., & Arvai, J. (2006b). Deconstructing adaptive management: Criteria for applications to environmental management. Ecological Applications, 16(6), 2411–2425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. (1997). Reflections on ‘what is ecosystem management?’. Conservation Biology, 11(1), 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habron, G. (2003). Role of adaptive management for watershed councils. Environmental Management, 31(1), 29–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, A., & Power, R. L. (1996). Adaptive management for sound ecosystem management. Environmental Management, 20(6), 879–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, T. M. (1994). Governance and adaptive management for estuarine ecosystems - The case of Chesapeake Bay. Coastal Management, 22(2), 119–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, C., & Sarewitz, D. (2000). Ex post evaluation: A more effective role for scientific assessments in environmental policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(3), 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, J. E., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Archer, S., Tugel, A. J., & Brown, J. R. (2006). An integrated framework for science-based arid land management. Journal of Arid Environments, 65(2), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, N. T. (2003). Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. Forest Ecology and Management, 181(1–2), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P., Gunderson, L. H., Folke, C., Baird, A. H., Bellwood, D., Berkes, F., et al. (2007). Adaptive management of the great barrier reef and the Grand Canyon world heritage areas. Ambio, 36(7), 586–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IIASA. (1979). Expect the Unexpected. An Adaptive Approach to Environmental Management (Executive Report No. 1). Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, K. N., & Kaplan, S. (2001). Coping with change: The small experiment as a strategic approach to environmental sustainability. Environmental Management, 28(6), 713–725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kentula, M. E. (2000). Perspectives on setting success criteria for wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering, 15(3–4), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough, H. L., & Blahna, D. J. (2006). Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conservation Biology, 20(5), 1373–1382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kneeshaw, D. D., Leduc, A., Drapeau, P., Gauthier, S., Pare, D., Carignan, R., et al. (2000). Development of integrated ecological standards of sustainable forest management at an operational scale. Forestry Chronicle, 76(3), 481–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C., Raymond, I., & Lance, K. (1998). An interdisciplinary tool for monitoring conservation impacts in Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 12(3), 549–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremsater, L., Bunnell, F., Huggard, D., & Dunsworth, G. (2003). Indicators to assess biological diversity: Weyerhaeuser's coastal British Columbia forest project. Forestry Chronicle, 79(3), 590–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson, A. R., & Argent, R. M. (2002). Adaptive management of environmental flows: Lessons for the Murray-Darling Basin from three large North American rivers. Australian Journal of Water Resources, 5(1), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1999). Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology, 3(2), [online] Art. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, G. (1998). An adaptive approach to planning and decision-making. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40(1–3), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, N. M. E. (1998). A systems approach to biodiversity conservation planning. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 49(2–3), 123–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. (1993). Uncertainty, resources exploitation, and conservation: Lessons from history. Science, 260(2 April), 17, 36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, H. J., Hodge, S., Albert, C., & Dunham, M. (2008). The greater yellowstone ecosystem: Challenges for regional ecosystem management. Environmental Management, 41(6), 820–833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G. B., & Rice, J. A. (2004). An active adaptive management case study in Ontario boreal mixedwood stands. Forestry Chronicle, 80(3), 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, L. H., & Coe, D. (2007). Influence of headwater streams on downstream reaches in forested areas. Forest Science, 53(2), 148–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttunen, M., & Vehanen, T. (2004). Toward adaptive management: The impacts of different management strategies on fish stocks and fisheries in a large regulated lake. Environmental Management, 33(6), 840–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, H. (2003). Challenges posed by the precautionary principle and accountability in ecological risk assessment. Environmetrics, 14(2), 245–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2007). Active adaptive management for conservation. Conservation Biology, 21(4), 956–963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T. L., & Gregory, R. (2004). Learning as an objective within a structured risk management decision process. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(7), 1921–1926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLain, R. J., & Lee, R. G. (1996). Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management, 20(4), 437–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne, B. A., Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R., Lindenmayer, D. B., Saunders, D. A., Wissel, C., et al. (2004). Species survival in fragmented landscapes: Where to from here? Biodiversity and Conservation, 13(1), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moir, W. H., & Block, W. M. (2001). Adaptive management on public lands in the United States: Commitment or rhetoric?Environmental Management, 28(2), 141–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, J. B., Marcot, B. G., & Sulyma, R. (2006). Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere, 36(12), 3104–3116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Rourke, E. (2006). Biodiversity and land use change on the Causse Mejan, France. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15(8), 2611–2626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojha, H., & Bhattarai, B. (2003). Learning to manage a complex resource: A case of NTFP assessment in Nepal. International Forestry Review, 5(2), 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Towards sustainability in the water sector - The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquatic Sciences, 64(4), 394–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(5), 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pik, A. J., Dangerfield, J. M., Bramble, R. A., Angus, C., & Nipperess, D. A. (2002). The use of invertebrates to detect small-scale habitat heterogeneity and its application to restoration practices. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 75(2), 179–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307, 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, E. (1999). Factors in overcoming barriers to implementing co-management in British Columbia salmon fisheries. Conservation Ecology, 3(2), [online] Art. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, A. B., & Jones, R. N. (2000). Adaptation to what and why? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 61, 9–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. (2007). A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, W. F., & Underwood, H. B. (1999). Of elephants and blind men: Deer management in the US national parks. Ecological Applications, 9(1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prato, T. (2005). Accounting for uncertainty in making species protection decisions. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 806–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prato, T. (2007). Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty. Land Use Policy, 24(1), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., Mathews, R., & Wigington, R. (2003). Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications, 13(1), 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., Warner, A. T., Meyer, J. L., & Lutz, K. (2006). A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications, 22(3), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E. (1996). Why ecosystem management can't work without social science: An example from the California northern spotted owl controversy. Environmental Management, 20(5), 667–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. H. (2006). The real river management challenge: Integrating scientists, stakeholders and service agencies. River Research and Applications, 22(2), 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, R. (1998). Modeling fire and nutrient flux. Journal of Forestry, 96(4), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R., Redford, K. H., & Robinson, J. G. (2002). Improving the practice of conservation: A conceptual framework and research agenda for conservation science. Conservation Biology, 16(6), 1469–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, B., & Aldred Cheek, K. (1999). Integrating citizens in adaptive management: A propo-sitional analysis. Conservation Ecology, 3(1), [online] Art. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, R. E. (1975). Systems Simulation: The Art and Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M., & Norton, B. G. (2005). A policy decision tool for integrated environmental assessment. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(4), 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, K., Possingham, H. P., Murdoch, W. W., & Roush, R. (2002). Active adaptive management in insect pest and weed control: Intervention with a plan for learning. Ecological Applications, 12(3), 927–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogen, K. (2003). Adapting adaptive management to a cultural understanding of land use conflicts. Society & Natural Resources, 16(5), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, R. L., Watzin, M. C., & Manning, R. E. (2007). Defining acceptable levels for ecological indicators: An approach for considering social values. Environmental Management, 39(3), 301–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., Bormann, B. T., Ryan, C., Shindler, B., Sturtevant, V., Clark, R. N., et al. (2003). Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan — Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Forestry, 101(1), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., Clark, R. N., & Bormann, B. T. (2005). Adaptive Management of Natural Resources: Theory, Concepts, and Management Institutions. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, H. B. (2008). Application of Bayesian statistical inference and decision theory to a fundamental problem in natural resource science: The adaptive management of an endangered species. Natural Resource Modeling, 21(2), 264–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, G. D., & Llewellyn, D. W. (2000). Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act: A programmatic application of adaptive management. Ecological Engineering, 15(3–4), 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M., & Lemon, M. (2001). Learning to network and networking to learn: Facilitating the process of adaptive management in a local response to the UK's National Air Quality Strategy. Environmental Management, 27(3), 321–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M., Lemon, M., & Longhurst, P. (2000). Intelligent urban management: Learning to manage and managing to learn together for a change. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1801–1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szaro, R. C., Berc, J., Cameron, S., Cordle, S., Crosby, M., Martin, L., et al. (1998). The ecosystem approach: Science and information management issues, gaps and needs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40(1–3), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, G. W., & Kentula, M. E. (2005). Coastal restoration: Where have we been, where are we now, and where should we be going? Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 40, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theberge, J. B., Theberge, M. T., Vucetich, J. A., & Paquet, P. C. (2006). Pitfalls of applying adaptive management to a wolf population in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario. Environmental Management, 37(4), 451–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. M. (2000). Adaptive management of coastal ecosystem restoration projects. Ecological Engineering, 15(3–4), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. M., Williams, G., Borde, A., Southard, J., Sargeant, S., Woodruff, D., et al. (2005). Adaptively addressing uncertainty in estuarine and near coastal restoration projects. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 40, 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torell, E. (2000). Adaptation and learning in coastal management: The experience of five East African initiatives. Coastal Management, 28(4), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viney, N. R., Bates, B. C., Charles, S. P., Webster, I. T., & Bormans, M. (2007). Modelling adaptive management strategies for coping with the impacts of climate variability and change on riverine algal blooms. Global Change Biology, 13(11), 2453–2465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. (1974). An interdisciplinary approach to development of watershed simulation models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 6, 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. (1997). Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology (online), 1(2), 1 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C., Korman, J., Stevens, L. E., & Gold, B. (2000). Ecosystem modeling for evaluation of adaptive management policies in the Grand Canyon. Conservation Ecology (online), 4(2), [online] Art 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. (2007). Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems? Ambio, 36(4), 304–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J., & Holling, C. S. (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 71(6), 2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. (2001). Uncertainty, learning, and the optimal management of wildlife. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 8(3), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., Argent, R., Grayson, R., Bunn, S., Davies, P., Hairsine, P., et al. (1996). A framework for integrating the impacts of riparian revegetation on stream values in large catchments. Eos, Transactions., 77(22), W38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. V., & Lantz, L. E. (2000). Issues and framework for building successful science management teams for natural areas management. Natural Areas Journal, 20(4), 381–385.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Argent, R.M. (2009). Components of Adaptive Management. In: Allan, C., Stankey, G.H. (eds) Adaptive Environmental Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9632-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics