Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from a Computer-Assisted Participatory Planning and Management Process in the Peak District National Park, England

  • Chapter

In order to support stakeholders in adapting to socio-economic, environmental and policy pressures a group of researchers and key stakeholders joined forces to develop an iterative social learning process supported by computer models designed in a participatory modeling process. We report on an ongoing research project in the peak district national park, UK. This chapter details the genesis, development and operation of this approach to enabling adaptive management in a complex socio-ecological landscape. Instead of experimenting with new management activities and learning from the results of these actions, we used formal computer models to tell the stakeholders what the implications of their actions might be in terms of their own economy and also environmental effects such as different growth patterns of plant species, biodiversity, as well as soil erosion, water quality and carbon fluxes. Such modeling of scenario modelling is assumed to enable decision making (and eventually activity) in ‘risky’ situations, or in a context of high risk aversion. Including stakeholders in all stages of the process increases acceptance of the work and allows the inclusions of relevant multiple views and can enhance shared understanding. A flexible approach that can react to participants' needs is a precondition. Participatory scenario modelling was found to be very useful as it enables surprises and changes in emphasis to be incorporated in the process thus providing flexibility to deal with social surprises such as linguistic ambiguity and physical surprises such as bird flu and foot and mouth disease, both of which reappeared on the agenda during this process. We also learned that the selection of stakeholders was important as well as developing a strong understanding of the context; and having a good facilitator. To have a chance for the learning and adaptive management process to survive beyond the project duration a certain set of attitudes and organisational cultures are required that can facilitate processes where goals are negotiated and outcomes are necessarily uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bellamy, P. H., Loveland, P. J., Bradley, R. I., Lark, M. R., Guy, J. D., & Kirk, G. J. D. (2005). Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978?2003. Nature, 437, 245–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. S., Termansen, M., Jin, N., Quinn, C. H., Cornell, S. J., Fraser, E. D. G., Hubacek, K., Kunin, W. E., & Reed, M. S. (2009). Modelling the coupled dynamics of moorland management and vegetation in the UK uplands. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46, 278–288. doi: 10.1111lj.1365-2664.2009.01618.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce. (2005). Survey of Businesses in the Peak District and Rural Action Zone. Report for the Peak District National Park. Chesterfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougill, A., Reed, M., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., Stagl, S., Stringer, L., & Holden, J. (2006). Learning from doing participatory rural research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English Nature. (2003). England's best wildlife and geological sites; the condition of SSSIs in England in 2003. Peterborough: English Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, R., Passarella, G., Uricchio, V. F., & Vurro, M. (2007). Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(2), 213–228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., Wrigth, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment: Design Issues, Current Experience and Future Prospects. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J., Shotbolt, L., Bonn, A., Burt, T. P., Chapman, P. J., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E. D. G., Hubacek, K., Irvine, B., Kirkby, M. J., Reed, M. S., Prell, C., Stagl, S., Stringer, L. C., Turner, A., & Worrall, F. (2007). Environmental change in moorland landscapes. Earth-Science Reviews, 82(1–2), 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., Prell, C., Reed, M., Bonn, A., & Boys, D. (2006). Using Stakeholder and Social Network Analysis to support participatory processes. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 2(3), 249–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Qasim, M., & Termansen, M. (2008). Description of the upland economy: areas of outstanding beauty and marginal economic performance. In A. Bonn, T. Allott, K. Hubacek, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Drivers of environmental change in uplands, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby, M. J., & Neale, R. H. (1987). A soil erosion model incorporating seasonal factors. International Geomorphology 1986: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Geomorphology, II, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • MFF. (no date). Moors for the Future Website. www.moorsforthefuture.org.uk. Moors for the Future. Retrieved 31.10.2008, from the World Wide Web:

  • Prell, C. (2003). Community networking and social capital: early investigations.. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, 8(3), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/prell.html

  • Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Reed, M., Burt, T., Holden, J., Jin, N., Kirby, M., Quinn, C., & Sendzimir, J. (2007). If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: ‘traditional’ versus participatory model building. Interdisciplinary Science Review, 32(3), 263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Quinn, C., & Reed, M. (2008). ‘Who's in the social network?’ When stakeholders influence data analysis. Special Issue Systemic Practice And Action Research. 21, 443–458. DOI: 10.1007/s11213-008-9105-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (forthcoming 2009). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management Society and Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M., Arblaster, K., Bullock, C., Burton, R., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Mitchley, J., Morris, J., Potter, C., Quinn, C., & Swales, V. (under review). Using scenarios to explore UK upland futures. >Futures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M., Bonn, A., Broad, K., Burgess, P., Burt, T., Fazey, I., Hubacek, K., Nainggolan, D., Quinn, C., Roberts, P., Stringer, L., Thorpe, S., Walton, D., Ravera, F., & Redpath, S. (under review). Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework. Journal of Environmental Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M., Prell, C., & Hubacek, K. (2005). Sustainable Upland Management for Multiple Benefits: a multi-stakeholder response to the Heather & Grass Burning Code consultation. Project report submitted to DEFRA's consultation on the review of the Heather and Grass Etc. (Burning) Regulations 1986 and the Heather and Grass Burning Code 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, R. V., & Kirkby, M. J. (2003). Application of salinization indicators and initial development of potential global soil salinization scenario under climatic change. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17(3), 1078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. S. (2006). Unpacking ‘participation’ in the adaptive management of socio-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(39), [online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Uplands Project. (no date). Website of the Sustainable Uplands Project. URL: www. see.leeds.ac.uk/sustainableuplands.

  • Termansen, M. (2009). Combining choice models and habitat succession models for land use change modelling. International Choice Modelling Conference. Harrogate, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walz, A., Lardelli, C., Behrendt, H., Gret-Regamey, A., Lundstrom, C., Kytzia, S., & Bebi, P. (2007). Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling. Landscape & Urban Planning 81, 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, F., Reed, M. S., Warburton, J., & Burt, T. (2003). Carbon budget for a British peat catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 312(1–3), 133–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hubacek, K., Reed, M. (2009). Lessons Learned from a Computer-Assisted Participatory Planning and Management Process in the Peak District National Park, England. In: Allan, C., Stankey, G.H. (eds) Adaptive Environmental Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9632-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics