Abstract
Significant progress in the understanding of the neuroanatomical and chemical basis of Drosophila courtship behavior has recently been obtained by means of genetic techniques. Progress in understanding the changes in the courtship behavior in response to the genetically modified central nervous system was, however, hampered by the lack of an appropriate methodology for the measurement of behavior. Here, we propose an operational definition of behavior that provides a sensitive quantification of the differences among Drosophila courtship behaviors. Using this approach, we gain evidence that a highly specific and expressive body language underlies Drosophila courtship, offering the largest individual expression bandwidth for normal males courting mature females. We also find that normal male Drosophila perform a switch from male to female behavior if they are together with males carrying the fruitless gene. From this we conjecture that the courtship behavior of normal Drosophila is based upon a sensor-driven bistable neurodynamical system, whereas the ruitless mutations lack this adaptive ability. We anticipate our assay and the developed methodological approach to be a starting point for systematic investigations of the relationship between genes and behavior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Hall, Science 264, 1702–1714 (1994).
M. Adams et al., Science 24, 2185–2195 (2000).
P. Stockinger, D. Kvitsiani, S. Rotkopf, L. Tirian, B.J. Dickson, Neural circuitry that governs Drosophila male courtship behavior, Cell 121, 795–807 (2005).
E. Demir, B.J. Dickson, Fruitless splicing specifies male courtship behavior in Drosophila, 121, 785–794 (2005).
D.A. Gailey, J.C. Hall, Behavior and cytogenetics of fruitless in Drosophila melanogaster: different courtship defects caused by separate, closely linked lesions, Genetics 121, 773–785 (1989).
H.T. Spieth, Courtship behavior in D., Ann. Rev. Entomol. 19, 385–405 (1974).
L. Giarratani, L.B. Vosshall, Toward a molecular description of pheromone perception, Neuron 39, 881–883 (2003).
T.A. Markow, Behavioral and sensory basis of courtship, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6200–6204 (1987).
H.V. Hirsch, L. Tompkins, The flexible fly: experience-dependent development of complex behaviors in D., J. Exp. Biol. 195, 1–18 (1994).
J. Peinke, J. Parisi, O.E. Roessler, R. Stoop, “Encounter with Chaos”, Springer, Berlin (1992).
H.B. Dowse, J.M. Ringo, K.M. Barton, A model describing the kinetics of mating in Drosophila, J. Theor. Biol. 121, 173–183 (1986).
P. Welbergen, B.M. Spruit, F.R. van Dijken, Mating speed and the interplay between femaleand male courtship responses in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae), J. Insect Behav. 5, 229–244 (1992).
T.A. Markow, S.J. Hanson, Multivariate analysis of Drosophila courtship, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 430–434 (1981).
A. Hoikkala, S. Crossley, Copulatory courtship in Drosophila: Behavior and songs of D. birchii and D. serrata, J. Insect Behav. 13, 71–86 (2000).
A. Hoikkala, S. Crossley, C. Castillo-Melenedez, Copulatory courtship in Drosophila birchii and D. serrata, species recognition and sexual selection, J. Insect Behav. 13, 361–373 (2000).
S. Chen, A.Y. Lee, N.M. Bowens, R. Huber, E.A. Kravitz, Fighting fruit flies: A model system for the study of aggression, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5664–5668 (2002).
Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavior.
R. Stoop, N. Stoop, L.A. Bunimovich, Complexity of dynamics as variability of predictabil-ity, J. Stat. Phys. 14, 1127–1137 (2004).
R. Stoop, C. Wagner, Scaling properties of simple limiter control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 154101 (2003).
R.J. Greenspan, J.F. Ferveur, Courtship in D., Ann. Rev. Genet. 34, 205–232 (2000).
A. Villella, D. A. Gailey, B. Berwald, S. Oshima, P.T. Barnes, J.C. Hall, Extended reproductive roles of the fruitless gene in Drosophila melanogaster revealed by behavioral analysis of new fru mutants, Genetics 147, 1107–1130 (1997).
B.I. Arthur, J.-M. Jallon, B. Caflisch, Y. Choffat, R. Noethiger, Sexual behavior in D. is irreversibly programmed during a critical period, Curr. Biol. 8, 187–190 (1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stoop, R., Arthur, B.I. (2009). An Expressive Body Language Underlies Drosophila Courtship Behavior. In: Dana, S.K., Roy, P.K., Kurths, J. (eds) Complex Dynamics in Physiological Systems: From Heart to Brain. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9143-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9143-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9142-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9143-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)