Abstract
In this chapter we examine the history of multisite, K-12 science education programs and evaluations funded by US government science agencies, particularly the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). In addition, we outline the history of general program evaluation. We review the science education evaluations funded by the US federal government to show how K-12 science education programs and their evaluations evolved over time. We begin with a description of multisite science education program evaluation, continue with an examination of the political and evaluation history, and finally, trace the K-12 science education programs and evaluations conducted by the science agencies. Evolution of the programs and evaluations is in part related to the changing political contexts. Such change is also the result of advances in the research and theory of science education and evaluation.
This work was partially supported by IES Award # R305C050059 Interdisciplinary Education Sciences Training Program University of Minnesota PRF# 473473.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banilower, E. R., Rosenberg, S.L, & Weiss, I. R. (2006). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement, 2003-06 Cross-Site Report. Retrieved October 21, 2008 from http://www.horizon-research.com/LSC/news/cross_site/06cross_site/cross-site06.pdf
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.
Coghlan, A. T., Preskill, H., & Catsambas, T. T. (2003). Using appreciative inquiry in evaluation. In H. Preskill and A. T. Coghlan (Eds.), New directions in evaluation (pp. 5–22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Doran, R., Lawrenz, F., & Helgeson, S. (1994). Research assessment in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook for research teaching and learning (pp. 388–442). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965. Public Law 89-10, 89th Congress, 1st Session, April 11, 1965.
Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering and Technology. (1993). The federal investment in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education: Where now? What next? Sourcebook. Report of the expert panel for the review of federal education programs in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED366502.) Retrieved October 21, 2008 from http://www.eric.edu.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/15/41/fc.pdf
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (2003). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Frechtling, J. (2002). The 2002 user-friendly handbook for project evaluations. Prepared under contract: REC99-12175. National Science Foundation: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication.
Government Performance Results Act of 1993. Public Law, 103-62, 103rd Congress, 1st Session, January 5, 1993.
Greene, J. C., DeStefano, L., Burgon, H., & Hall, J. (2006). Advancing evaluation of STEM efforts through attention to diversity and culture. In D. Huffman & F. Lawrenz (Eds.), Critical issues in STEM evaluation (pp. 53–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lawrenz, F. (2007). Science program evaluation. In S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 943–964). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mertens, D. M., & Hopson, R. K. (2006). Advancing evaluation of STEM efforts through attention to diversity and culture. In D. Huffman & F. Lawrenz (Eds.), Critical issues in STEM evaluation (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 109) (pp. 35–51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
National Geographic Society. (2006). Essential principles of ocean literacy. Retrieved October 21, 2008 from http://www.ngsednet.org/community/resource_uploads/OceanLitBrochure.pdf
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (1994). A review of the NOAA national sea grant college program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2006). Evaluation of the sea grant program review process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2008a). Essential principles of climate literacy. Retrieved October 21, 2008 from http://www.climate.noaa.gov/education/pdfs/climate_literacy_poster-final.pdf
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2008b). NOAA’s education strategic plan (Draft). Retrieved October 20, 2008 from http://www.oesd.noaa.gov/08%20NOAA%20Education%20Strategic%20Plan%20Full%20Draft%207_14.pdf
National Science Board. (2007). Moving forward to improve engineering education (NSB-07-122). Washington, DC: Author.
National Research Council of the National Academies. (2008). NASA’s elementary and secondary education program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107-110. H.R. 1. 107th Congress, 2nd Session, January 8, 2002.
Rice, J. M. (1898). The rational spelling book. New York: American Book Company.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Stevahn, L., King, J., Ghere, G., & Minnema, J. (2005). Establishing essential competencies for program evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 43–59.
Tyler, R. W., & Smith, E. R. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress. New York: McGraw-Hill.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). The condition of education 2006 (U.S. Department of Education NCES 2006-071). Washington, DC: Ed Pubs.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. National Academies. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Weiss, J. (1988). Quality education indicators in Canada: What will “stand on guard for thee”? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14, 65–74.
Williams, H. A., Jr. (1979). Foreword. In F. M. Zweig (Ed.), Evaluation in legislation (pp. 7–9). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lawrenz, F., Desjardins, C.D. (2012). Trends in US Government-Funded Multisite K—12 Science Program Evaluation. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9040-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9041-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)