Skip to main content

Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Choosing the Remediation Method for a Landfill Based on Mixed Ordinal and Cardinal Information

  • Conference paper

Abstract

We describe a real-life application of a multicriteria method in the context of remediating a landfill in Finland. The landfill was used for dumping industrial waste during the years 1950 to 1965. During that time many harmful chemicals were stored in landfills among other waste. Therefore, this—and possibly several other—landfills have to be remediated. In this application, seven different remediation options were evaluated based on 13 criteria. For some criteria, cardinal measures with associated uncertainties were obtained. For other criteria, only ordinal (ranking) information was available. The problem was analyzed using the Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis with Ordinal Criteria (SMAA-O) multicriteria method, which is able to handle this kind of mixed data. SMAA-O represents inaccurate or uncertain cardinal criteria values with a joint probability distribution. Ordinal data are converted into stochastic cardinal data by simulating all consistent mappings between ordinal and cardinal scales that preserve the given rankings. Decision makers’ (DMs’) unknown or partly known preferences are at the same time simulated by choosing weights randomly from appropriate distributions. The main results of the analysis are so-called acceptability indices for alternatives describing how large a variety of DMs’ preferences support an alternative for the first rank or any given rank. The method also computes what kinds of preferences favor each alternative, and provides confidence factors measuring if the data are sufficiently accurate for making an informed decision. In this application, the SMAA-O analysis also aided the DMs in forming a new alternative as a combination of two original alternatives. This new alternative was identified as the preferred solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bana e Costa C.A., Vansnick J-C. 1994. MACBETH an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. International Transactions in Operations Research 4(1):489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bana e Costa C.A. 1986. A multicriteria decision aid methodology to deal with conflicting situations on the weights. European Journal of Operational Research 26:22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler J., Jia J., Dyer J. 1997. Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multicriteria decision models. European Journal of Operational Research 103:531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnetski J.R., Soland R.M. 1978. Multiple-attribute decision making with partial information: the Comparative hypervolume criterion. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 25:279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durbach I. 2006. A simulation-based test of stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using achievement functions. European Journal of Operational Research 170(3):923–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R., Miettinen K., Salminen P. 1998. Determining the implementation order of a general plan by multicriteria method. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 7:273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R., Salminen P. 1999. A multiple criteria decision model for analyzing and choosing among different development patterns for the Helsinki cargo harbor. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 33:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang C-L., Lin. M-J. 1987. Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jiménez A., Ríos-Insua S., Mateos A. 2003. A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments. Decision Support Systems 36(1):65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lahdelma R., Hokkanen J., Salminen P. 1998. SMAA — Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 106(1):137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lahdelma R., Miettinen K., Salminen P. 2003. Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). European Journal of Operational Research 147(1): 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lahdelma R., Miettinen K., Salminen P. 2005. Reference point approach for multiple decision makers. European Journal of Operational Research 164(3):785—791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lahdelma R., Salminen P. 2001. SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research 49(3):444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lahdelma R., Salminen P. 2002. Pseudo-criteria versus linear utility function in Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 141(2):454–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lahdelma R., Salminen P. 2006. Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model. European Journal of Operational Research 170(1):241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lahdelma R., Salminen P., Hokkanen J. 2000. Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 26(6):595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lahdelma R., Salminen P., Simonen A., Hokkanen J. 2001. Choosing a reparation method for a landfill using the SMAA-O multicriteria method. In Köksalan, Zionts (eds.) multiple criteria decision making in the new millennium, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 507:380–389.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maystre L.Y., Picted J., Simos J. 1994. Méthodes Multicritéres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rietveld P., Ouwersloot H. 1992. Ordinal data in multicriteria decision making, a stochastic dominance approach to siting nuclear power plants. European Journal of Operational Research 56:249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers M., Bruen M., Maystre L-Y. 1999. Electre and Decision Support — Methods and Applications in Engineering and Infrastructure Investment. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  21. SMAA-TRI: A parameter stability analysis methods for ELECTRE TRI. In I. Linkov, G.A. Kiker, R.J. Wenning (eds.) Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas, NATO Security through Science Series — C: Environmental Security, Springer 2007, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tervonen T., Figueira J. 2006. A Survey on Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis Methods. Research Report 1, The Institute of Systems Engineering and Computers (INESC Coimbra), Coimbra, Portugal, 27 p.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tervonen T., Figueira J., Lahdelma R., Salminen P. 2004. An inverse approach for ELECTRE III. Research Report 20, The Institute of Systems Engineering and Computers (INESC Coimbra), Coimbra, Portugal, 17 p.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tervonen T., Hakonen H., Lahdelma R. 2008: Elevator planning using Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis. Omega 36(3):352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tervonen T., Lahdelma R. 2007: Implementing Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 178(2):500–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vincke Ph. 1992. Multicriteria Decision-Aid. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yu W. 1992. Aide multicritère à la décision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri : Concepts, méthodes et applications. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Lahdelma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P. (2008). Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Choosing the Remediation Method for a Landfill Based on Mixed Ordinal and Cardinal Information. In: Linkov, I., Ferguson, E., Magar, V.S. (eds) Real-Time and Deliberative Decision Making. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9026-4_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics