Abstract
Welfare losses due to monopoly have received much attention in the literature since the pioneering work of Harberger (1954). Over the past decade the discussion has inter alia been extended to take explicit account of oligopolistic interaction (see, in particular, Dixit and Stern, 1982; Masson and Shaanan, 1984; Daskin, 1991). However the ultimate aim has mostly remained to work towards theoretically well-grounded empirical estimates of actual losses in different industries, sectors or economies. As Daskin observes, the range of estimated losses, though significantly larger than Harberger’s original 0.1 per cent of GNP, with one or two notable exceptions rarely exceeds 1–3 per cent of the value of output based on monopoly models1; though, using a theoretical extension and empirical implementation of Dixit and Stern, Daskin himself goes on to report an estimate of 6–10 per cent of the value of shipments (for the US manufacturing sector) if industry demand is elastic, and ‘considerably higher’ with inelastic demand.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1994 John Cable, Alan Carruth and Avinash Dixit
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cable, J., Carruth, A., Dixit, A. (1994). Oligopoly and Welfare. In: Cable, J. (eds) Current Issues in Industrial Economics. Current Issues in Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23154-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23154-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-56281-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23154-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)